Loading…

Micropore Analysis of Biomass Chars by CO2 Adsorption: Comparison of Different Analysis Methods

Detailed knowledge of the pore structure evolution of fuel chars is essential for a sound description of the conversion process. The analysis of the chars by N2 adsorption at 77.36 K according to the theory of Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller has been established as a standard in pore analysis. However,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy & fuels 2021-05, Vol.35 (10), p.8799-8806
Main Authors: Wedler, Carsten, Span, Roland
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 8806
container_issue 10
container_start_page 8799
container_title Energy & fuels
container_volume 35
creator Wedler, Carsten
Span, Roland
description Detailed knowledge of the pore structure evolution of fuel chars is essential for a sound description of the conversion process. The analysis of the chars by N2 adsorption at 77.36 K according to the theory of Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller has been established as a standard in pore analysis. However, at this low temperature, the diffusion of N2 in micropores is limited, and N2 is therefore not suitable for an analysis of the microporous structure. For micropore analysis, CO2 adsorption at 273.15 K can be used instead since CO2 shows no limitation with regard to diffusion into micropores. For the evaluation of the CO2 adsorption data, various analysis methods are available, which are commonly used in the literature. However, no consistent method has been established in the literature to determine micropore volume and surface area, and the used methods are often not described in a traceable way, which makes a comparison of results based on different analysis approaches hardly possible. To show and discuss the differences, CO2 adsorption experiments were conducted in this study for four biomass chars. The data were analyzed according to Dubinin–Astakhov (DA), Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR), and nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) analysis. Because DA and DR are only able to determine the pore volume of the chars, an additional correlation is required to determine the surface area. Three different correlations for the relation between pore volume and surface area were compared within this study as well.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00280
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_acs_journals_10_1021_acs_energyfuels_1c00280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>a469473193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-acs_journals_10_1021_acs_energyfuels_1c002803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdj0GLwjAUhMPiwlbd32D-QOtLutXu3rQqXooX7yHWZI3UvJJXD_33WhD07GlgmBnmY2wiIBEgxVRXlBhvwn9nr6amRFQAMocPFolMQpyB_B2wCPJ8HsNM_nyxIdEZAGZpnkVMla4K2GAwfOF13ZEjjpYvHV40ES9OOhA_dLzYSb44Eoamdej_eIGXRgdH6Pv4yllrgvHtc6Q07QmPNGafVtdkvh86YulmvS-28f22OuM13POkBKieRfXmC4t6sKTvtW745VoZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Micropore Analysis of Biomass Chars by CO2 Adsorption: Comparison of Different Analysis Methods</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Wedler, Carsten ; Span, Roland</creator><creatorcontrib>Wedler, Carsten ; Span, Roland</creatorcontrib><description>Detailed knowledge of the pore structure evolution of fuel chars is essential for a sound description of the conversion process. The analysis of the chars by N2 adsorption at 77.36 K according to the theory of Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller has been established as a standard in pore analysis. However, at this low temperature, the diffusion of N2 in micropores is limited, and N2 is therefore not suitable for an analysis of the microporous structure. For micropore analysis, CO2 adsorption at 273.15 K can be used instead since CO2 shows no limitation with regard to diffusion into micropores. For the evaluation of the CO2 adsorption data, various analysis methods are available, which are commonly used in the literature. However, no consistent method has been established in the literature to determine micropore volume and surface area, and the used methods are often not described in a traceable way, which makes a comparison of results based on different analysis approaches hardly possible. To show and discuss the differences, CO2 adsorption experiments were conducted in this study for four biomass chars. The data were analyzed according to Dubinin–Astakhov (DA), Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR), and nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) analysis. Because DA and DR are only able to determine the pore volume of the chars, an additional correlation is required to determine the surface area. Three different correlations for the relation between pore volume and surface area were compared within this study as well.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0887-0624</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Bioenergy, Biofuels, and Biorefinery</subject><ispartof>Energy &amp; fuels, 2021-05, Vol.35 (10), p.8799-8806</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8275-912X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wedler, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Span, Roland</creatorcontrib><title>Micropore Analysis of Biomass Chars by CO2 Adsorption: Comparison of Different Analysis Methods</title><title>Energy &amp; fuels</title><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><description>Detailed knowledge of the pore structure evolution of fuel chars is essential for a sound description of the conversion process. The analysis of the chars by N2 adsorption at 77.36 K according to the theory of Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller has been established as a standard in pore analysis. However, at this low temperature, the diffusion of N2 in micropores is limited, and N2 is therefore not suitable for an analysis of the microporous structure. For micropore analysis, CO2 adsorption at 273.15 K can be used instead since CO2 shows no limitation with regard to diffusion into micropores. For the evaluation of the CO2 adsorption data, various analysis methods are available, which are commonly used in the literature. However, no consistent method has been established in the literature to determine micropore volume and surface area, and the used methods are often not described in a traceable way, which makes a comparison of results based on different analysis approaches hardly possible. To show and discuss the differences, CO2 adsorption experiments were conducted in this study for four biomass chars. The data were analyzed according to Dubinin–Astakhov (DA), Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR), and nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) analysis. Because DA and DR are only able to determine the pore volume of the chars, an additional correlation is required to determine the surface area. Three different correlations for the relation between pore volume and surface area were compared within this study as well.</description><subject>Bioenergy, Biofuels, and Biorefinery</subject><issn>0887-0624</issn><issn>1520-5029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqdj0GLwjAUhMPiwlbd32D-QOtLutXu3rQqXooX7yHWZI3UvJJXD_33WhD07GlgmBnmY2wiIBEgxVRXlBhvwn9nr6amRFQAMocPFolMQpyB_B2wCPJ8HsNM_nyxIdEZAGZpnkVMla4K2GAwfOF13ZEjjpYvHV40ES9OOhA_dLzYSb44Eoamdej_eIGXRgdH6Pv4yllrgvHtc6Q07QmPNGafVtdkvh86YulmvS-28f22OuM13POkBKieRfXmC4t6sKTvtW745VoZ</recordid><startdate>20210520</startdate><enddate>20210520</enddate><creator>Wedler, Carsten</creator><creator>Span, Roland</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope/><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8275-912X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210520</creationdate><title>Micropore Analysis of Biomass Chars by CO2 Adsorption: Comparison of Different Analysis Methods</title><author>Wedler, Carsten ; Span, Roland</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-acs_journals_10_1021_acs_energyfuels_1c002803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bioenergy, Biofuels, and Biorefinery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wedler, Carsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Span, Roland</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wedler, Carsten</au><au>Span, Roland</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Micropore Analysis of Biomass Chars by CO2 Adsorption: Comparison of Different Analysis Methods</atitle><jtitle>Energy &amp; fuels</jtitle><addtitle>Energy Fuels</addtitle><date>2021-05-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>8799</spage><epage>8806</epage><pages>8799-8806</pages><issn>0887-0624</issn><eissn>1520-5029</eissn><abstract>Detailed knowledge of the pore structure evolution of fuel chars is essential for a sound description of the conversion process. The analysis of the chars by N2 adsorption at 77.36 K according to the theory of Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller has been established as a standard in pore analysis. However, at this low temperature, the diffusion of N2 in micropores is limited, and N2 is therefore not suitable for an analysis of the microporous structure. For micropore analysis, CO2 adsorption at 273.15 K can be used instead since CO2 shows no limitation with regard to diffusion into micropores. For the evaluation of the CO2 adsorption data, various analysis methods are available, which are commonly used in the literature. However, no consistent method has been established in the literature to determine micropore volume and surface area, and the used methods are often not described in a traceable way, which makes a comparison of results based on different analysis approaches hardly possible. To show and discuss the differences, CO2 adsorption experiments were conducted in this study for four biomass chars. The data were analyzed according to Dubinin–Astakhov (DA), Dubinin–Radushkevich (DR), and nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT) analysis. Because DA and DR are only able to determine the pore volume of the chars, an additional correlation is required to determine the surface area. Three different correlations for the relation between pore volume and surface area were compared within this study as well.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00280</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8275-912X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0887-0624
ispartof Energy & fuels, 2021-05, Vol.35 (10), p.8799-8806
issn 0887-0624
1520-5029
language eng
recordid cdi_acs_journals_10_1021_acs_energyfuels_1c00280
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
subjects Bioenergy, Biofuels, and Biorefinery
title Micropore Analysis of Biomass Chars by CO2 Adsorption: Comparison of Different Analysis Methods
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A16%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Micropore%20Analysis%20of%20Biomass%20Chars%20by%20CO2%20Adsorption:%20Comparison%20of%20Different%20Analysis%20Methods&rft.jtitle=Energy%20&%20fuels&rft.au=Wedler,%20Carsten&rft.date=2021-05-20&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=8799&rft.epage=8806&rft.pages=8799-8806&rft.issn=0887-0624&rft.eissn=1520-5029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00280&rft_dat=%3Cacs%3Ea469473193%3C/acs%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-acs_journals_10_1021_acs_energyfuels_1c002803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true