Pourbaix Diagrams for H2O Oxidation to Adsorbed OH on Pt(111) and Why They Differ from Those for Bulk Solids

Density functional calculations show that Pourbaix diagrams for reactions involving surface species are not the same as for bulk solids. This finding is based on calculations for the onset potentials over the pH range 0–14 for 15 water oxidation reactions forming OH­(ads) + H+(aq) + e– on Pt(111). T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physical chemistry. C 2018-05, Vol.122 (18), p.9958-9964
Main Author: Anderson, Alfred B
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 9964
container_issue 18
container_start_page 9958
container_title Journal of physical chemistry. C
container_volume 122
creator Anderson, Alfred B
description Density functional calculations show that Pourbaix diagrams for reactions involving surface species are not the same as for bulk solids. This finding is based on calculations for the onset potentials over the pH range 0–14 for 15 water oxidation reactions forming OH­(ads) + H+(aq) + e– on Pt(111). The deviations are results of the dependencies of Gibbs energies of adsorbed reactants on the electrode potential, causing their activities to change with potential instead of being fixed at unity, which is the case for Pourbaix diagrams of solids. In a sense, the redox couple changes as the electrode potential changes because at each potential the adsorbed reactants and products have new structures.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01315
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_acs_journals_10_1021_acs_jpcc_8b01315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>c115348219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a192t-6f2ec82fb65239a457aabcd7213f329417ee27ac3626603cc9bbf376b1dd39623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHveoYOrObrLbHGv9iFBIwYrHsJ82Mc1KNoX237vW4mmGh5d3mAehayATIBTupQ6T5lvryVQRYJCdoBHkjCYizbLT_z0V5-gihIaQjMXYCLVLv-2VrHf4sZafvdwE7HyPC1riclcbOdS-w4PHMxN8r6zBZYEjWQ43AHCLZWfwx3qPV2u7jw3O2R673m8i8MEeqh627Rd-821twiU6c7IN9uo4x-j9-Wk1L5JF-fI6ny0SCTkdEu6o1VPqFM8oy2WaCSmVNoICc4zmKQhrqZCacco5YVrnSjkmuAJjWM4pG6O7v94opWrig128VgGpfk1VBxhNVUdT7AfwUFxP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pourbaix Diagrams for H2O Oxidation to Adsorbed OH on Pt(111) and Why They Differ from Those for Bulk Solids</title><source>American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read &amp; Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)</source><creator>Anderson, Alfred B</creator><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Alfred B</creatorcontrib><description>Density functional calculations show that Pourbaix diagrams for reactions involving surface species are not the same as for bulk solids. This finding is based on calculations for the onset potentials over the pH range 0–14 for 15 water oxidation reactions forming OH­(ads) + H+(aq) + e– on Pt(111). The deviations are results of the dependencies of Gibbs energies of adsorbed reactants on the electrode potential, causing their activities to change with potential instead of being fixed at unity, which is the case for Pourbaix diagrams of solids. In a sense, the redox couple changes as the electrode potential changes because at each potential the adsorbed reactants and products have new structures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-7447</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-7455</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Chemical Society</publisher><ispartof>Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2018-05, Vol.122 (18), p.9958-9964</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3691-0439</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Alfred B</creatorcontrib><title>Pourbaix Diagrams for H2O Oxidation to Adsorbed OH on Pt(111) and Why They Differ from Those for Bulk Solids</title><title>Journal of physical chemistry. C</title><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><description>Density functional calculations show that Pourbaix diagrams for reactions involving surface species are not the same as for bulk solids. This finding is based on calculations for the onset potentials over the pH range 0–14 for 15 water oxidation reactions forming OH­(ads) + H+(aq) + e– on Pt(111). The deviations are results of the dependencies of Gibbs energies of adsorbed reactants on the electrode potential, causing their activities to change with potential instead of being fixed at unity, which is the case for Pourbaix diagrams of solids. In a sense, the redox couple changes as the electrode potential changes because at each potential the adsorbed reactants and products have new structures.</description><issn>1932-7447</issn><issn>1932-7455</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNo9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFbvHveoYOrObrLbHGv9iFBIwYrHsJ82Mc1KNoX237vW4mmGh5d3mAehayATIBTupQ6T5lvryVQRYJCdoBHkjCYizbLT_z0V5-gihIaQjMXYCLVLv-2VrHf4sZafvdwE7HyPC1riclcbOdS-w4PHMxN8r6zBZYEjWQ43AHCLZWfwx3qPV2u7jw3O2R673m8i8MEeqh627Rd-821twiU6c7IN9uo4x-j9-Wk1L5JF-fI6ny0SCTkdEu6o1VPqFM8oy2WaCSmVNoICc4zmKQhrqZCacco5YVrnSjkmuAJjWM4pG6O7v94opWrig128VgGpfk1VBxhNVUdT7AfwUFxP</recordid><startdate>20180510</startdate><enddate>20180510</enddate><creator>Anderson, Alfred B</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope/><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-0439</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20180510</creationdate><title>Pourbaix Diagrams for H2O Oxidation to Adsorbed OH on Pt(111) and Why They Differ from Those for Bulk Solids</title><author>Anderson, Alfred B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a192t-6f2ec82fb65239a457aabcd7213f329417ee27ac3626603cc9bbf376b1dd39623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Alfred B</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anderson, Alfred B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pourbaix Diagrams for H2O Oxidation to Adsorbed OH on Pt(111) and Why They Differ from Those for Bulk Solids</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physical chemistry. C</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys. Chem. C</addtitle><date>2018-05-10</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>122</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>9958</spage><epage>9964</epage><pages>9958-9964</pages><issn>1932-7447</issn><eissn>1932-7455</eissn><abstract>Density functional calculations show that Pourbaix diagrams for reactions involving surface species are not the same as for bulk solids. This finding is based on calculations for the onset potentials over the pH range 0–14 for 15 water oxidation reactions forming OH­(ads) + H+(aq) + e– on Pt(111). The deviations are results of the dependencies of Gibbs energies of adsorbed reactants on the electrode potential, causing their activities to change with potential instead of being fixed at unity, which is the case for Pourbaix diagrams of solids. In a sense, the redox couple changes as the electrode potential changes because at each potential the adsorbed reactants and products have new structures.</abstract><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01315</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3691-0439</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-7447
ispartof Journal of physical chemistry. C, 2018-05, Vol.122 (18), p.9958-9964
issn 1932-7447
1932-7455
language eng
recordid cdi_acs_journals_10_1021_acs_jpcc_8b01315
source American Chemical Society:Jisc Collections:American Chemical Society Read & Publish Agreement 2022-2024 (Reading list)
title Pourbaix Diagrams for H2O Oxidation to Adsorbed OH on Pt(111) and Why They Differ from Those for Bulk Solids
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A10%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pourbaix%20Diagrams%20for%20H2O%20Oxidation%20to%20Adsorbed%20OH%20on%20Pt(111)%20and%20Why%20They%20Differ%20from%20Those%20for%20Bulk%20Solids&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physical%20chemistry.%20C&rft.au=Anderson,%20Alfred%20B&rft.date=2018-05-10&rft.volume=122&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=9958&rft.epage=9964&rft.pages=9958-9964&rft.issn=1932-7447&rft.eissn=1932-7455&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b01315&rft_dat=%3Cacs%3Ec115348219%3C/acs%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a192t-6f2ec82fb65239a457aabcd7213f329417ee27ac3626603cc9bbf376b1dd39623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true