Loading…
Computations of High-Lift Wing Configuration on Unstructured Grids Using
Turbulent flow computations of the NASA “trap-wing” high-lift configuration are performed at various angles of attack using a k-ω family of models to assess their capabilities for high-lift design and optimization applications. The four k-ω model variants used are: 1) Wilcox’s 1988 baseline model; 2...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of aircraft 2013-11, Vol.50 (6), p.1682-1695 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1695 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1682 |
container_title | Journal of aircraft |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Reyes, Dasia A Girimaji, Sharath S Pandya, Mohagna J Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S |
description | Turbulent flow computations of the NASA “trap-wing” high-lift configuration are performed at various angles of attack using a k-ω family of models to assess their capabilities for high-lift design and optimization applications. The four k-ω model variants used are: 1) Wilcox’s 1988 baseline model; 2) variable-β* model consistent with the rapidly strained limit; 3) variable-β* model consistent with the explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model; and 4) Wilcox’s 2006 enhanced model. Subject to the conditions of this test, the variable-β* model consistent with the rapidly strained limit not only performs the best but is also numerically more robust and does not require the use of a production-to-dissipation limiter. Overall, our findings indicate that variable β* makes an important difference. In the proximity of stall, a low-Reynolds-number correction to eddy viscosity may be needed to accurately capture experimental behavior. The results provide much needed insight into the models’ predictive capabilities and identify areas for future k-ω model improvements. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.C031492 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>aiaa</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_C031492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_2514_1_C031492</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_C0314923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjrsKwjAYRoMoWC-Db5DJrfVP0-tc1A6OFscQbFNTNJFc3t8qfQDhgwMfZzgI7QhEcUqSA4kqoCQp4xkKSEppSIusmKMAICZhkWXlEq2sHQCggDwPUF3p19s77qRWFmuBa9k_wosUDt-k6nGllZC9Nz8Bj2uUdcbfnTddi89GthY3djQ3aCH403bbiWu0Px2vVR1yyTkbtDdqvBkB9u1khE2d9G_xA2mwQLo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computations of High-Lift Wing Configuration on Unstructured Grids Using</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Reyes, Dasia A ; Girimaji, Sharath S ; Pandya, Mohagna J ; Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S</creator><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Dasia A ; Girimaji, Sharath S ; Pandya, Mohagna J ; Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S</creatorcontrib><description>Turbulent flow computations of the NASA “trap-wing” high-lift configuration are performed at various angles of attack using a k-ω family of models to assess their capabilities for high-lift design and optimization applications. The four k-ω model variants used are: 1) Wilcox’s 1988 baseline model; 2) variable-β* model consistent with the rapidly strained limit; 3) variable-β* model consistent with the explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model; and 4) Wilcox’s 2006 enhanced model. Subject to the conditions of this test, the variable-β* model consistent with the rapidly strained limit not only performs the best but is also numerically more robust and does not require the use of a production-to-dissipation limiter. Overall, our findings indicate that variable β* makes an important difference. In the proximity of stall, a low-Reynolds-number correction to eddy viscosity may be needed to accurately capture experimental behavior. The results provide much needed insight into the models’ predictive capabilities and identify areas for future k-ω model improvements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8669</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.C031492</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><ispartof>Journal of aircraft, 2013-11, Vol.50 (6), p.1682-1695</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by Dasia A. Reyes, Sharath S. Girimaji, Mohagna J. Pandya, and Khaled S. Abdol-Hamid. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Dasia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girimaji, Sharath S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandya, Mohagna J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S</creatorcontrib><title>Computations of High-Lift Wing Configuration on Unstructured Grids Using</title><title>Journal of aircraft</title><description>Turbulent flow computations of the NASA “trap-wing” high-lift configuration are performed at various angles of attack using a k-ω family of models to assess their capabilities for high-lift design and optimization applications. The four k-ω model variants used are: 1) Wilcox’s 1988 baseline model; 2) variable-β* model consistent with the rapidly strained limit; 3) variable-β* model consistent with the explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model; and 4) Wilcox’s 2006 enhanced model. Subject to the conditions of this test, the variable-β* model consistent with the rapidly strained limit not only performs the best but is also numerically more robust and does not require the use of a production-to-dissipation limiter. Overall, our findings indicate that variable β* makes an important difference. In the proximity of stall, a low-Reynolds-number correction to eddy viscosity may be needed to accurately capture experimental behavior. The results provide much needed insight into the models’ predictive capabilities and identify areas for future k-ω model improvements.</description><issn>0021-8669</issn><issn>1533-3868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNjrsKwjAYRoMoWC-Db5DJrfVP0-tc1A6OFscQbFNTNJFc3t8qfQDhgwMfZzgI7QhEcUqSA4kqoCQp4xkKSEppSIusmKMAICZhkWXlEq2sHQCggDwPUF3p19s77qRWFmuBa9k_wosUDt-k6nGllZC9Nz8Bj2uUdcbfnTddi89GthY3djQ3aCH403bbiWu0Px2vVR1yyTkbtDdqvBkB9u1khE2d9G_xA2mwQLo</recordid><startdate>201311</startdate><enddate>201311</enddate><creator>Reyes, Dasia A</creator><creator>Girimaji, Sharath S</creator><creator>Pandya, Mohagna J</creator><creator>Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>201311</creationdate><title>Computations of High-Lift Wing Configuration on Unstructured Grids Using</title><author>Reyes, Dasia A ; Girimaji, Sharath S ; Pandya, Mohagna J ; Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_C0314923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reyes, Dasia A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girimaji, Sharath S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandya, Mohagna J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of aircraft</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reyes, Dasia A</au><au>Girimaji, Sharath S</au><au>Pandya, Mohagna J</au><au>Abdol-Hamid, Khaled S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computations of High-Lift Wing Configuration on Unstructured Grids Using</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aircraft</jtitle><date>2013-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1682</spage><epage>1695</epage><pages>1682-1695</pages><issn>0021-8669</issn><eissn>1533-3868</eissn><abstract>Turbulent flow computations of the NASA “trap-wing” high-lift configuration are performed at various angles of attack using a k-ω family of models to assess their capabilities for high-lift design and optimization applications. The four k-ω model variants used are: 1) Wilcox’s 1988 baseline model; 2) variable-β* model consistent with the rapidly strained limit; 3) variable-β* model consistent with the explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model; and 4) Wilcox’s 2006 enhanced model. Subject to the conditions of this test, the variable-β* model consistent with the rapidly strained limit not only performs the best but is also numerically more robust and does not require the use of a production-to-dissipation limiter. Overall, our findings indicate that variable β* makes an important difference. In the proximity of stall, a low-Reynolds-number correction to eddy viscosity may be needed to accurately capture experimental behavior. The results provide much needed insight into the models’ predictive capabilities and identify areas for future k-ω model improvements.</abstract><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.C031492</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8669 |
ispartof | Journal of aircraft, 2013-11, Vol.50 (6), p.1682-1695 |
issn | 0021-8669 1533-3868 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_C031492 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
title | Computations of High-Lift Wing Configuration on Unstructured Grids Using |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A40%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-aiaa&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computations%20of%20High-Lift%20Wing%20Configuration%20on%20Unstructured%20Grids%20Using&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aircraft&rft.au=Reyes,%20Dasia%20A&rft.date=2013-11&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1682&rft.epage=1695&rft.pages=1682-1695&rft.issn=0021-8669&rft.eissn=1533-3868&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.C031492&rft_dat=%3Caiaa%3E10_2514_1_C031492%3C/aiaa%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_C0314923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |