Loading…
Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model
Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array....
Saved in:
Published in: | AIAA journal 2018-12, Vol.56 (12), p.4801-4814 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3 |
container_end_page | 4814 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 4801 |
container_title | AIAA journal |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Jones, Natasha R Jarrett, Jerome P |
description | Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array. A computational study using infinite-wing and aircraft models creates a design method tailoring bump location, ramp angle, and rotation to local flow conditions on the aircraft wing. Rules for rotation and ramp angle produce comparable performance trends on both models. The former correctly predicts the best rotation as a few degrees from the average local flow direction, whereas the optimal ramp angles were 0.625 times that of the initial distribution because the beneficial influence on lift of shorter arrays was stronger than that provided by infinite-wing shock control bumps. This final array performance was in good agreement with a ballpark prediction for its impact on local wave drag. However, the total aircraft drag change was larger than the local impact, due to an influence away from the immediate vicinity of the array, and the impact on lift. Consequently, when choosing preferred array designs, it is essential to consider the impact on the entire aircraft model at fixed-lift conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.J056725 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J056725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2167793444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkL1OwzAUhS0EEqEw8AaWkJAYUuK_2BnbQPlREQNFsFlOYpeUNA52O2TjHXhDngSjVGLgLldX99M5RweAU5SMMUP0Eo3vE5ZyzPZAhBghMRHsdR9ESZKgGFGGD8GR96twYS5QBGZX2tfLtm6XUMGnN1u-w9y2G2cbON2uOzhxTvXQWBfeC6dab9u6hC-B__78mtqqhw-20s0xODCq8fpkt0fgeXa9yG_j-ePNXT6Zx4pgsYmZ5ryoaEGztMiqMCkuQlomBDM4JSUlmRC0qDDRRitlypQqXGQlN7rilBoyAmeDbufsx1b7jVzZrWuDpcQo5TwjlNJAXQxU6az3ThvZuXqtXC9RIn9rkkjuagrs-cCqWqk_tf_gDzXnZX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2167793444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jones, Natasha R ; Jarrett, Jerome P</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Natasha R ; Jarrett, Jerome P</creatorcontrib><description>Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array. A computational study using infinite-wing and aircraft models creates a design method tailoring bump location, ramp angle, and rotation to local flow conditions on the aircraft wing. Rules for rotation and ramp angle produce comparable performance trends on both models. The former correctly predicts the best rotation as a few degrees from the average local flow direction, whereas the optimal ramp angles were 0.625 times that of the initial distribution because the beneficial influence on lift of shorter arrays was stronger than that provided by infinite-wing shock control bumps. This final array performance was in good agreement with a ballpark prediction for its impact on local wave drag. However, the total aircraft drag change was larger than the local impact, due to an influence away from the immediate vicinity of the array, and the impact on lift. Consequently, when choosing preferred array designs, it is essential to consider the impact on the entire aircraft model at fixed-lift conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J056725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Aircraft design ; Aircraft models ; Arrays ; Design ; Lift ; Local flow ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Rotation ; Three dimensional models ; Wave drag ; Wings (aircraft)</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2018-12, Vol.56 (12), p.4801-4814</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by Natasha R. Jones and Jerome P. Jarrett. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the ISSN (print) or (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 by Natasha R. Jones and Jerome P. Jarrett. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0001-1452 (print) or 1533-385X (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Natasha R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrett, Jerome P</creatorcontrib><title>Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array. A computational study using infinite-wing and aircraft models creates a design method tailoring bump location, ramp angle, and rotation to local flow conditions on the aircraft wing. Rules for rotation and ramp angle produce comparable performance trends on both models. The former correctly predicts the best rotation as a few degrees from the average local flow direction, whereas the optimal ramp angles were 0.625 times that of the initial distribution because the beneficial influence on lift of shorter arrays was stronger than that provided by infinite-wing shock control bumps. This final array performance was in good agreement with a ballpark prediction for its impact on local wave drag. However, the total aircraft drag change was larger than the local impact, due to an influence away from the immediate vicinity of the array, and the impact on lift. Consequently, when choosing preferred array designs, it is essential to consider the impact on the entire aircraft model at fixed-lift conditions.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft design</subject><subject>Aircraft models</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Lift</subject><subject>Local flow</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Wave drag</subject><subject>Wings (aircraft)</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkL1OwzAUhS0EEqEw8AaWkJAYUuK_2BnbQPlREQNFsFlOYpeUNA52O2TjHXhDngSjVGLgLldX99M5RweAU5SMMUP0Eo3vE5ZyzPZAhBghMRHsdR9ESZKgGFGGD8GR96twYS5QBGZX2tfLtm6XUMGnN1u-w9y2G2cbON2uOzhxTvXQWBfeC6dab9u6hC-B__78mtqqhw-20s0xODCq8fpkt0fgeXa9yG_j-ePNXT6Zx4pgsYmZ5ryoaEGztMiqMCkuQlomBDM4JSUlmRC0qDDRRitlypQqXGQlN7rilBoyAmeDbufsx1b7jVzZrWuDpcQo5TwjlNJAXQxU6az3ThvZuXqtXC9RIn9rkkjuagrs-cCqWqk_tf_gDzXnZX4</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Jones, Natasha R</creator><creator>Jarrett, Jerome P</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model</title><author>Jones, Natasha R ; Jarrett, Jerome P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft design</topic><topic>Aircraft models</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Lift</topic><topic>Local flow</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Wave drag</topic><topic>Wings (aircraft)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Natasha R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrett, Jerome P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Natasha R</au><au>Jarrett, Jerome P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4801</spage><epage>4814</epage><pages>4801-4814</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array. A computational study using infinite-wing and aircraft models creates a design method tailoring bump location, ramp angle, and rotation to local flow conditions on the aircraft wing. Rules for rotation and ramp angle produce comparable performance trends on both models. The former correctly predicts the best rotation as a few degrees from the average local flow direction, whereas the optimal ramp angles were 0.625 times that of the initial distribution because the beneficial influence on lift of shorter arrays was stronger than that provided by infinite-wing shock control bumps. This final array performance was in good agreement with a ballpark prediction for its impact on local wave drag. However, the total aircraft drag change was larger than the local impact, due to an influence away from the immediate vicinity of the array, and the impact on lift. Consequently, when choosing preferred array designs, it is essential to consider the impact on the entire aircraft model at fixed-lift conditions.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J056725</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1452 |
ispartof | AIAA journal, 2018-12, Vol.56 (12), p.4801-4814 |
issn | 0001-1452 1533-385X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J056725 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aircraft Aircraft design Aircraft models Arrays Design Lift Local flow Mathematical models Optimization Rotation Three dimensional models Wave drag Wings (aircraft) |
title | Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20a%20Shock%20Control%20Bump%20Array%20for%20a%20Transonic%20Wing%E2%80%93Body%20Model&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Jones,%20Natasha%20R&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4801&rft.epage=4814&rft.pages=4801-4814&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J056725&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E2167793444%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2167793444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |