Loading…

Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model

Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AIAA journal 2018-12, Vol.56 (12), p.4801-4814
Main Authors: Jones, Natasha R, Jarrett, Jerome P
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3
container_end_page 4814
container_issue 12
container_start_page 4801
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 56
creator Jones, Natasha R
Jarrett, Jerome P
description Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array. A computational study using infinite-wing and aircraft models creates a design method tailoring bump location, ramp angle, and rotation to local flow conditions on the aircraft wing. Rules for rotation and ramp angle produce comparable performance trends on both models. The former correctly predicts the best rotation as a few degrees from the average local flow direction, whereas the optimal ramp angles were 0.625 times that of the initial distribution because the beneficial influence on lift of shorter arrays was stronger than that provided by infinite-wing shock control bumps. This final array performance was in good agreement with a ballpark prediction for its impact on local wave drag. However, the total aircraft drag change was larger than the local impact, due to an influence away from the immediate vicinity of the array, and the impact on lift. Consequently, when choosing preferred array designs, it is essential to consider the impact on the entire aircraft model at fixed-lift conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J056725
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J056725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2167793444</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkL1OwzAUhS0EEqEw8AaWkJAYUuK_2BnbQPlREQNFsFlOYpeUNA52O2TjHXhDngSjVGLgLldX99M5RweAU5SMMUP0Eo3vE5ZyzPZAhBghMRHsdR9ESZKgGFGGD8GR96twYS5QBGZX2tfLtm6XUMGnN1u-w9y2G2cbON2uOzhxTvXQWBfeC6dab9u6hC-B__78mtqqhw-20s0xODCq8fpkt0fgeXa9yG_j-ePNXT6Zx4pgsYmZ5ryoaEGztMiqMCkuQlomBDM4JSUlmRC0qDDRRitlypQqXGQlN7rilBoyAmeDbufsx1b7jVzZrWuDpcQo5TwjlNJAXQxU6az3ThvZuXqtXC9RIn9rkkjuagrs-cCqWqk_tf_gDzXnZX4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2167793444</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Jones, Natasha R ; Jarrett, Jerome P</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Natasha R ; Jarrett, Jerome P</creatorcontrib><description>Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array. A computational study using infinite-wing and aircraft models creates a design method tailoring bump location, ramp angle, and rotation to local flow conditions on the aircraft wing. Rules for rotation and ramp angle produce comparable performance trends on both models. The former correctly predicts the best rotation as a few degrees from the average local flow direction, whereas the optimal ramp angles were 0.625 times that of the initial distribution because the beneficial influence on lift of shorter arrays was stronger than that provided by infinite-wing shock control bumps. This final array performance was in good agreement with a ballpark prediction for its impact on local wave drag. However, the total aircraft drag change was larger than the local impact, due to an influence away from the immediate vicinity of the array, and the impact on lift. Consequently, when choosing preferred array designs, it is essential to consider the impact on the entire aircraft model at fixed-lift conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J056725</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Aircraft design ; Aircraft models ; Arrays ; Design ; Lift ; Local flow ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Rotation ; Three dimensional models ; Wave drag ; Wings (aircraft)</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2018-12, Vol.56 (12), p.4801-4814</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by Natasha R. Jones and Jerome P. Jarrett. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the ISSN (print) or (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 by Natasha R. Jones and Jerome P. Jarrett. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the ISSN 0001-1452 (print) or 1533-385X (online) to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Natasha R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrett, Jerome P</creatorcontrib><title>Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array. A computational study using infinite-wing and aircraft models creates a design method tailoring bump location, ramp angle, and rotation to local flow conditions on the aircraft wing. Rules for rotation and ramp angle produce comparable performance trends on both models. The former correctly predicts the best rotation as a few degrees from the average local flow direction, whereas the optimal ramp angles were 0.625 times that of the initial distribution because the beneficial influence on lift of shorter arrays was stronger than that provided by infinite-wing shock control bumps. This final array performance was in good agreement with a ballpark prediction for its impact on local wave drag. However, the total aircraft drag change was larger than the local impact, due to an influence away from the immediate vicinity of the array, and the impact on lift. Consequently, when choosing preferred array designs, it is essential to consider the impact on the entire aircraft model at fixed-lift conditions.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft design</subject><subject>Aircraft models</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Lift</subject><subject>Local flow</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Wave drag</subject><subject>Wings (aircraft)</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkL1OwzAUhS0EEqEw8AaWkJAYUuK_2BnbQPlREQNFsFlOYpeUNA52O2TjHXhDngSjVGLgLldX99M5RweAU5SMMUP0Eo3vE5ZyzPZAhBghMRHsdR9ESZKgGFGGD8GR96twYS5QBGZX2tfLtm6XUMGnN1u-w9y2G2cbON2uOzhxTvXQWBfeC6dab9u6hC-B__78mtqqhw-20s0xODCq8fpkt0fgeXa9yG_j-ePNXT6Zx4pgsYmZ5ryoaEGztMiqMCkuQlomBDM4JSUlmRC0qDDRRitlypQqXGQlN7rilBoyAmeDbufsx1b7jVzZrWuDpcQo5TwjlNJAXQxU6az3ThvZuXqtXC9RIn9rkkjuagrs-cCqWqk_tf_gDzXnZX4</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Jones, Natasha R</creator><creator>Jarrett, Jerome P</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model</title><author>Jones, Natasha R ; Jarrett, Jerome P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft design</topic><topic>Aircraft models</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Lift</topic><topic>Local flow</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Wave drag</topic><topic>Wings (aircraft)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Natasha R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarrett, Jerome P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Natasha R</au><au>Jarrett, Jerome P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>4801</spage><epage>4814</epage><pages>4801-4814</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>Research on three-dimensional shock control bumps has paid little attention to design methods for arrays on aircraft. This paper takes a first step, examining whether design rules for maximizing the on-design performance of swept infinite-wing bumps can be successfully used to build a finite array. A computational study using infinite-wing and aircraft models creates a design method tailoring bump location, ramp angle, and rotation to local flow conditions on the aircraft wing. Rules for rotation and ramp angle produce comparable performance trends on both models. The former correctly predicts the best rotation as a few degrees from the average local flow direction, whereas the optimal ramp angles were 0.625 times that of the initial distribution because the beneficial influence on lift of shorter arrays was stronger than that provided by infinite-wing shock control bumps. This final array performance was in good agreement with a ballpark prediction for its impact on local wave drag. However, the total aircraft drag change was larger than the local impact, due to an influence away from the immediate vicinity of the array, and the impact on lift. Consequently, when choosing preferred array designs, it is essential to consider the impact on the entire aircraft model at fixed-lift conditions.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J056725</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2018-12, Vol.56 (12), p.4801-4814
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J056725
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aircraft
Aircraft design
Aircraft models
Arrays
Design
Lift
Local flow
Mathematical models
Optimization
Rotation
Three dimensional models
Wave drag
Wings (aircraft)
title Designing a Shock Control Bump Array for a Transonic Wing–Body Model
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T19%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Designing%20a%20Shock%20Control%20Bump%20Array%20for%20a%20Transonic%20Wing%E2%80%93Body%20Model&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Jones,%20Natasha%20R&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=4801&rft.epage=4814&rft.pages=4801-4814&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J056725&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E2167793444%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a328t-5e77bd4b496b9dddd62b5675885f263c439884bd23efeaafc64a2b9c7fed744f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2167793444&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true