Loading…
Scientists as spies?
In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to coun...
Saved in:
Published in: | Politics and the life sciences 2023, Vol.42 (1), p.32-64 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 64 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | Politics and the life sciences |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Vogel, Kathleen M. Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia |
description | In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to counter the transfer by U.S.-based scientists involved in the TTP of knowledge and intellectual property that could support China’s military and economic might and pose threats to U.S. national security. This initiative launched a number of investigations into major U.S. federal funding agencies and universities and charged several scientists, many of them life scientists, with failing to accurately report their work and affiliations with Chinese entities and illegally transferring scientific information to China. Although the FBI cases demonstrate a clear problem with disclosure of foreign contracts and research integrity among some TTP recipients, they have failed to demonstrate any harm to U.S. national security interests. At the heart of this controversy are core questions that remain unresolved and need more attention: What is required to transfer and develop knowledge to further a country’s science and technology ambitions? And can the knowledge acquired by a visiting scientist be easily used to further a country’s ambitions? Drawing on literature from the field of science and technology studies, this article discusses the key issues that should be considered in evaluating this question in the Chinese context and the potential scientific, intelligence, and policy implications of knowledge transfer as it relates to the TTP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/pls.2022.13 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cambridge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_pls_2022_13</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_pls_2022_13</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_pls_2022_13</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz81OQjEQhuGGaOIRWekFcAM9znRaZs7KGOJfQuJCWDdtT0sOASQU71-Irr7d--VR6h6hRUB-PGxra8CYFmmkGrSM2lnHV6oBJtAdib1Rt7VuANCgnTXq4SsNeX8a6qlOQ53Ww5Dr0526LmFb8-R_x2r1-rKcv-vF59vH_HmhEyKTnnEXQmcIsoUciwliTeDoCDOIRJLUx2y4p5g5BYEkUoqErgAlJ45orPRfN4VdPA79OvvN989xf_70CP5C8meSv5A8Ev0Czk89YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scientists as spies?</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Vogel, Kathleen M. ; Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creator><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Kathleen M. ; Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creatorcontrib><description>In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to counter the transfer by U.S.-based scientists involved in the TTP of knowledge and intellectual property that could support China’s military and economic might and pose threats to U.S. national security. This initiative launched a number of investigations into major U.S. federal funding agencies and universities and charged several scientists, many of them life scientists, with failing to accurately report their work and affiliations with Chinese entities and illegally transferring scientific information to China. Although the FBI cases demonstrate a clear problem with disclosure of foreign contracts and research integrity among some TTP recipients, they have failed to demonstrate any harm to U.S. national security interests. At the heart of this controversy are core questions that remain unresolved and need more attention: What is required to transfer and develop knowledge to further a country’s science and technology ambitions? And can the knowledge acquired by a visiting scientist be easily used to further a country’s ambitions? Drawing on literature from the field of science and technology studies, this article discusses the key issues that should be considered in evaluating this question in the Chinese context and the potential scientific, intelligence, and policy implications of knowledge transfer as it relates to the TTP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/pls.2022.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><ispartof>Politics and the life sciences, 2023, Vol.42 (1), p.32-64</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-8520-4402</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0730938422000132/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creatorcontrib><title>Scientists as spies?</title><title>Politics and the life sciences</title><addtitle>Polit. life sci</addtitle><description>In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to counter the transfer by U.S.-based scientists involved in the TTP of knowledge and intellectual property that could support China’s military and economic might and pose threats to U.S. national security. This initiative launched a number of investigations into major U.S. federal funding agencies and universities and charged several scientists, many of them life scientists, with failing to accurately report their work and affiliations with Chinese entities and illegally transferring scientific information to China. Although the FBI cases demonstrate a clear problem with disclosure of foreign contracts and research integrity among some TTP recipients, they have failed to demonstrate any harm to U.S. national security interests. At the heart of this controversy are core questions that remain unresolved and need more attention: What is required to transfer and develop knowledge to further a country’s science and technology ambitions? And can the knowledge acquired by a visiting scientist be easily used to further a country’s ambitions? Drawing on literature from the field of science and technology studies, this article discusses the key issues that should be considered in evaluating this question in the Chinese context and the potential scientific, intelligence, and policy implications of knowledge transfer as it relates to the TTP.</description><issn>0730-9384</issn><issn>1471-5457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotz81OQjEQhuGGaOIRWekFcAM9znRaZs7KGOJfQuJCWDdtT0sOASQU71-Irr7d--VR6h6hRUB-PGxra8CYFmmkGrSM2lnHV6oBJtAdib1Rt7VuANCgnTXq4SsNeX8a6qlOQ53Ww5Dr0526LmFb8-R_x2r1-rKcv-vF59vH_HmhEyKTnnEXQmcIsoUciwliTeDoCDOIRJLUx2y4p5g5BYEkUoqErgAlJ45orPRfN4VdPA79OvvN989xf_70CP5C8meSv5A8Ev0Czk89YQ</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Vogel, Kathleen M.</creator><creator>Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-4402</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Scientists as spies?</title><author>Vogel, Kathleen M. ; Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press Wholly Gold Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Politics and the life sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vogel, Kathleen M.</au><au>Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scientists as spies?</atitle><jtitle>Politics and the life sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Polit. life sci</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>32-64</pages><issn>0730-9384</issn><eissn>1471-5457</eissn><abstract>In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to counter the transfer by U.S.-based scientists involved in the TTP of knowledge and intellectual property that could support China’s military and economic might and pose threats to U.S. national security. This initiative launched a number of investigations into major U.S. federal funding agencies and universities and charged several scientists, many of them life scientists, with failing to accurately report their work and affiliations with Chinese entities and illegally transferring scientific information to China. Although the FBI cases demonstrate a clear problem with disclosure of foreign contracts and research integrity among some TTP recipients, they have failed to demonstrate any harm to U.S. national security interests. At the heart of this controversy are core questions that remain unresolved and need more attention: What is required to transfer and develop knowledge to further a country’s science and technology ambitions? And can the knowledge acquired by a visiting scientist be easily used to further a country’s ambitions? Drawing on literature from the field of science and technology studies, this article discusses the key issues that should be considered in evaluating this question in the Chinese context and the potential scientific, intelligence, and policy implications of knowledge transfer as it relates to the TTP.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/pls.2022.13</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-4402</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0730-9384 |
ispartof | Politics and the life sciences, 2023, Vol.42 (1), p.32-64 |
issn | 0730-9384 1471-5457 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_pls_2022_13 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Cambridge University Press |
title | Scientists as spies? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scientists%20as%20spies?&rft.jtitle=Politics%20and%20the%20life%20sciences&rft.au=Vogel,%20Kathleen%20M.&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=32-64&rft.issn=0730-9384&rft.eissn=1471-5457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/pls.2022.13&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge%3E10_1017_pls_2022_13%3C/cambridge%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_pls_2022_13&rfr_iscdi=true |