Loading…

Scientists as spies?

In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to coun...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politics and the life sciences 2023, Vol.42 (1), p.32-64
Main Authors: Vogel, Kathleen M., Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533
cites
container_end_page 64
container_issue 1
container_start_page 32
container_title Politics and the life sciences
container_volume 42
creator Vogel, Kathleen M.
Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia
description In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to counter the transfer by U.S.-based scientists involved in the TTP of knowledge and intellectual property that could support China’s military and economic might and pose threats to U.S. national security. This initiative launched a number of investigations into major U.S. federal funding agencies and universities and charged several scientists, many of them life scientists, with failing to accurately report their work and affiliations with Chinese entities and illegally transferring scientific information to China. Although the FBI cases demonstrate a clear problem with disclosure of foreign contracts and research integrity among some TTP recipients, they have failed to demonstrate any harm to U.S. national security interests. At the heart of this controversy are core questions that remain unresolved and need more attention: What is required to transfer and develop knowledge to further a country’s science and technology ambitions? And can the knowledge acquired by a visiting scientist be easily used to further a country’s ambitions? Drawing on literature from the field of science and technology studies, this article discusses the key issues that should be considered in evaluating this question in the Chinese context and the potential scientific, intelligence, and policy implications of knowledge transfer as it relates to the TTP.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/pls.2022.13
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cambridge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_pls_2022_13</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_pls_2022_13</cupid><sourcerecordid>10_1017_pls_2022_13</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz81OQjEQhuGGaOIRWekFcAM9znRaZs7KGOJfQuJCWDdtT0sOASQU71-Irr7d--VR6h6hRUB-PGxra8CYFmmkGrSM2lnHV6oBJtAdib1Rt7VuANCgnTXq4SsNeX8a6qlOQ53Ww5Dr0526LmFb8-R_x2r1-rKcv-vF59vH_HmhEyKTnnEXQmcIsoUciwliTeDoCDOIRJLUx2y4p5g5BYEkUoqErgAlJ45orPRfN4VdPA79OvvN989xf_70CP5C8meSv5A8Ev0Czk89YQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scientists as spies?</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Vogel, Kathleen M. ; Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creator><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Kathleen M. ; Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creatorcontrib><description>In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to counter the transfer by U.S.-based scientists involved in the TTP of knowledge and intellectual property that could support China’s military and economic might and pose threats to U.S. national security. This initiative launched a number of investigations into major U.S. federal funding agencies and universities and charged several scientists, many of them life scientists, with failing to accurately report their work and affiliations with Chinese entities and illegally transferring scientific information to China. Although the FBI cases demonstrate a clear problem with disclosure of foreign contracts and research integrity among some TTP recipients, they have failed to demonstrate any harm to U.S. national security interests. At the heart of this controversy are core questions that remain unresolved and need more attention: What is required to transfer and develop knowledge to further a country’s science and technology ambitions? And can the knowledge acquired by a visiting scientist be easily used to further a country’s ambitions? Drawing on literature from the field of science and technology studies, this article discusses the key issues that should be considered in evaluating this question in the Chinese context and the potential scientific, intelligence, and policy implications of knowledge transfer as it relates to the TTP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-5457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/pls.2022.13</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><ispartof>Politics and the life sciences, 2023, Vol.42 (1), p.32-64</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for Politics and the Life Sciences</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-8520-4402</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0730938422000132/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,72960</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creatorcontrib><title>Scientists as spies?</title><title>Politics and the life sciences</title><addtitle>Polit. life sci</addtitle><description>In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to counter the transfer by U.S.-based scientists involved in the TTP of knowledge and intellectual property that could support China’s military and economic might and pose threats to U.S. national security. This initiative launched a number of investigations into major U.S. federal funding agencies and universities and charged several scientists, many of them life scientists, with failing to accurately report their work and affiliations with Chinese entities and illegally transferring scientific information to China. Although the FBI cases demonstrate a clear problem with disclosure of foreign contracts and research integrity among some TTP recipients, they have failed to demonstrate any harm to U.S. national security interests. At the heart of this controversy are core questions that remain unresolved and need more attention: What is required to transfer and develop knowledge to further a country’s science and technology ambitions? And can the knowledge acquired by a visiting scientist be easily used to further a country’s ambitions? Drawing on literature from the field of science and technology studies, this article discusses the key issues that should be considered in evaluating this question in the Chinese context and the potential scientific, intelligence, and policy implications of knowledge transfer as it relates to the TTP.</description><issn>0730-9384</issn><issn>1471-5457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotz81OQjEQhuGGaOIRWekFcAM9znRaZs7KGOJfQuJCWDdtT0sOASQU71-Irr7d--VR6h6hRUB-PGxra8CYFmmkGrSM2lnHV6oBJtAdib1Rt7VuANCgnTXq4SsNeX8a6qlOQ53Ww5Dr0526LmFb8-R_x2r1-rKcv-vF59vH_HmhEyKTnnEXQmcIsoUciwliTeDoCDOIRJLUx2y4p5g5BYEkUoqErgAlJ45orPRfN4VdPA79OvvN989xf_70CP5C8meSv5A8Ev0Czk89YQ</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Vogel, Kathleen M.</creator><creator>Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-4402</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Scientists as spies?</title><author>Vogel, Kathleen M. ; Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Kathleen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge University Press Wholly Gold Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Politics and the life sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vogel, Kathleen M.</au><au>Ben Ouagrham-Gormley, Sonia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scientists as spies?</atitle><jtitle>Politics and the life sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Polit. life sci</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>32-64</pages><issn>0730-9384</issn><eissn>1471-5457</eissn><abstract>In 2008, the Chinese government created the Thousand Talents Program (TTP) to recruit overseas expertise to build up China’s science and technology knowledge and innovation base. Ten years later, in 2018, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) announced a new “China Initiative” that aimed to counter the transfer by U.S.-based scientists involved in the TTP of knowledge and intellectual property that could support China’s military and economic might and pose threats to U.S. national security. This initiative launched a number of investigations into major U.S. federal funding agencies and universities and charged several scientists, many of them life scientists, with failing to accurately report their work and affiliations with Chinese entities and illegally transferring scientific information to China. Although the FBI cases demonstrate a clear problem with disclosure of foreign contracts and research integrity among some TTP recipients, they have failed to demonstrate any harm to U.S. national security interests. At the heart of this controversy are core questions that remain unresolved and need more attention: What is required to transfer and develop knowledge to further a country’s science and technology ambitions? And can the knowledge acquired by a visiting scientist be easily used to further a country’s ambitions? Drawing on literature from the field of science and technology studies, this article discusses the key issues that should be considered in evaluating this question in the Chinese context and the potential scientific, intelligence, and policy implications of knowledge transfer as it relates to the TTP.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/pls.2022.13</doi><tpages>33</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8520-4402</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-9384
ispartof Politics and the life sciences, 2023, Vol.42 (1), p.32-64
issn 0730-9384
1471-5457
language eng
recordid cdi_cambridge_journals_10_1017_pls_2022_13
source Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Cambridge University Press
title Scientists as spies?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cambridge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scientists%20as%20spies?&rft.jtitle=Politics%20and%20the%20life%20sciences&rft.au=Vogel,%20Kathleen%20M.&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=32-64&rft.issn=0730-9384&rft.eissn=1471-5457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/pls.2022.13&rft_dat=%3Ccambridge%3E10_1017_pls_2022_13%3C/cambridge%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1173-679aa9230e40ebf2a842a7b531e088b38cdbe27d3be7ca80c88ff8a9f03c58533%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_pls_2022_13&rfr_iscdi=true