Partikkel ved’ Udmurdi, Komi ja Ersa keeles

This article considers the model of adaptation of the Russian modal particle ведь in three Eastern Finno-Ugric languages: Udmurt, Komi (Zyryan), and Erzya. We focus on contextual (sentence type) restrictions that hold for VED’ in the source language and aim at finding how particle (in its phonetic v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Keel ja kirjandus 2022, Vol.LXV (1-2), p.110-129
Main Authors: Zubova, Iuliia, Teptiuk, Denys, Todesk, Triin, Tuuling, Eda-Riin
Format: Article
Language:Estonian
Subjects:
Comparative linguistics
Finno-Ugrian studies
Function words
Komi
Language studies
Mordvin languages
Pragmatics
Theoretical Linguistics
Udmurt language
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article considers the model of adaptation of the Russian modal particle ведь in three Eastern Finno-Ugric languages: Udmurt, Komi (Zyryan), and Erzya. We focus on contextual (sentence type) restrictions that hold for VED’ in the source language and aim at finding how particle (in its phonetic variants) behaves in the corresponding contexts in the recipient languages. The analysis is based on the results of a questionnaire where native speakers were asked to evaluate the naturalness of the use of the particle VED’ as well as its indigenous counterparts. We analyzed the following sentence types: assertive sentences, polar questions, tag questions, constituent questions, exclamative sentences, and orders. The results show that the restrictions observed for the Russian ведь are generally looser in the recipient languages in most sentence types. The contexts where the particle is ungrammatical are those where a lexically or syntactically expressed question operator is used. We propose an explanation based on the semantics of the particle why these contexts do not allow for its use.
ISSN:0131-1441
2346-6014
DOI:10.54013/kk770a7