Loading…
Has the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICT-BD) assisted to Reconcile Society?
Following the Liberation War of 1971 between Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) and West Pakistan, Bangladesh, a newly formed country, enacted the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act in 1973 to prosecute and punish war criminals. However, it was not until 2009 that the Bangladeshi government reviv...
Saved in:
Published in: | Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica 2023, Vol.19 (2), p.115-149 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 149 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 115 |
container_title | Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Mustakimur, Rahman Md |
description | Following the Liberation War of 1971 between Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) and West Pakistan, Bangladesh, a newly formed country, enacted the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act in 1973 to prosecute and punish war criminals. However, it was not until 2009 that the Bangladeshi government revived the vision of trials, announcing its intention to establish a war crimes tribunal. By appointing judges, investigators, and prosecutors, the tribunal was finally established in 2010. Although the tribunal formed by the 1973 Act is claimed to operate independently, this article argues that several significant shortcomings hinder the overall judicial process of criminalizing and sentencing individuals. To do that, it examines several provisions of the 1973 Act and the tribunal’s operations in light of international standards. The paper concludes that while the Bangladeshi government’s efforts to bring the suspects to justice are praiseworthy, the domestic tribunal fell short of guaranteeing the accused’s right to a fair trial and justice for society. It further contends that instead of uniting society, the tribunal splintered it. The study continues by noting that combining a hybrid tribunal and a Truth Commission could have helped unite the community and ensured justice. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1180785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1180785</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>1180785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_11807853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjb0KwjAURoMoWLSPINxRh0DTP-MktCp21Q5uJW2vNhITaNLBt7eCu9Ph48B3JsQLgzShEd-xKfEYj2PKgzScE99aWQej45wloUduZ2HBdQiFdthr4aTRQkHeyxdaKHtZD9-dCf1QokXbwbrIS5odNiDGK-uwBWfggo3RjVQIV9NIdO_9kszuQln0f1yQ1elY5mfaIBpVPc0w1pStGOPBlifRP_8BfNo-bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Has the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICT-BD) assisted to Reconcile Society?</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Mustakimur, Rahman Md</creator><creatorcontrib>Mustakimur, Rahman Md</creatorcontrib><description>Following the Liberation War of 1971 between Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) and West Pakistan, Bangladesh, a newly formed country, enacted the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act in 1973 to prosecute and punish war criminals. However, it was not until 2009 that the Bangladeshi government revived the vision of trials, announcing its intention to establish a war crimes tribunal. By appointing judges, investigators, and prosecutors, the tribunal was finally established in 2010. Although the tribunal formed by the 1973 Act is claimed to operate independently, this article argues that several significant shortcomings hinder the overall judicial process of criminalizing and sentencing individuals. To do that, it examines several provisions of the 1973 Act and the tribunal’s operations in light of international standards. The paper concludes that while the Bangladeshi government’s efforts to bring the suspects to justice are praiseworthy, the domestic tribunal fell short of guaranteeing the accused’s right to a fair trial and justice for society. It further contends that instead of uniting society, the tribunal splintered it. The study continues by noting that combining a hybrid tribunal and a Truth Commission could have helped unite the community and ensured justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1844-8062</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2065-3891</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Danubius University Press</publisher><subject>Criminal Law ; Criminology</subject><ispartof>Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 2023, Vol.19 (2), p.115-149</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2023_78293.png</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mustakimur, Rahman Md</creatorcontrib><title>Has the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICT-BD) assisted to Reconcile Society?</title><title>Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica</title><addtitle>Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica</addtitle><description>Following the Liberation War of 1971 between Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) and West Pakistan, Bangladesh, a newly formed country, enacted the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act in 1973 to prosecute and punish war criminals. However, it was not until 2009 that the Bangladeshi government revived the vision of trials, announcing its intention to establish a war crimes tribunal. By appointing judges, investigators, and prosecutors, the tribunal was finally established in 2010. Although the tribunal formed by the 1973 Act is claimed to operate independently, this article argues that several significant shortcomings hinder the overall judicial process of criminalizing and sentencing individuals. To do that, it examines several provisions of the 1973 Act and the tribunal’s operations in light of international standards. The paper concludes that while the Bangladeshi government’s efforts to bring the suspects to justice are praiseworthy, the domestic tribunal fell short of guaranteeing the accused’s right to a fair trial and justice for society. It further contends that instead of uniting society, the tribunal splintered it. The study continues by noting that combining a hybrid tribunal and a Truth Commission could have helped unite the community and ensured justice.</description><subject>Criminal Law</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><issn>1844-8062</issn><issn>2065-3891</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFjb0KwjAURoMoWLSPINxRh0DTP-MktCp21Q5uJW2vNhITaNLBt7eCu9Ph48B3JsQLgzShEd-xKfEYj2PKgzScE99aWQej45wloUduZ2HBdQiFdthr4aTRQkHeyxdaKHtZD9-dCf1QokXbwbrIS5odNiDGK-uwBWfggo3RjVQIV9NIdO_9kszuQln0f1yQ1elY5mfaIBpVPc0w1pStGOPBlifRP_8BfNo-bQ</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Mustakimur, Rahman Md</creator><general>Danubius University Press</general><general>Editura Universitară Danubius</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Has the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICT-BD) assisted to Reconcile Society?</title><author>Mustakimur, Rahman Md</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_11807853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Criminal Law</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mustakimur, Rahman Md</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mustakimur, Rahman Md</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Has the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICT-BD) assisted to Reconcile Society?</atitle><jtitle>Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Universitatis Danubius Juridica</addtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>115</spage><epage>149</epage><pages>115-149</pages><issn>1844-8062</issn><eissn>2065-3891</eissn><abstract>Following the Liberation War of 1971 between Bangladesh (formerly East Pakistan) and West Pakistan, Bangladesh, a newly formed country, enacted the International Crimes (Tribunals) Act in 1973 to prosecute and punish war criminals. However, it was not until 2009 that the Bangladeshi government revived the vision of trials, announcing its intention to establish a war crimes tribunal. By appointing judges, investigators, and prosecutors, the tribunal was finally established in 2010. Although the tribunal formed by the 1973 Act is claimed to operate independently, this article argues that several significant shortcomings hinder the overall judicial process of criminalizing and sentencing individuals. To do that, it examines several provisions of the 1973 Act and the tribunal’s operations in light of international standards. The paper concludes that while the Bangladeshi government’s efforts to bring the suspects to justice are praiseworthy, the domestic tribunal fell short of guaranteeing the accused’s right to a fair trial and justice for society. It further contends that instead of uniting society, the tribunal splintered it. The study continues by noting that combining a hybrid tribunal and a Truth Commission could have helped unite the community and ensured justice.</abstract><pub>Danubius University Press</pub><tpages>35</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1844-8062 |
ispartof | Acta Universitatis Danubius. Juridica, 2023, Vol.19 (2), p.115-149 |
issn | 1844-8062 2065-3891 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_1180785 |
source | Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Criminal Law Criminology |
title | Has the International Crimes Tribunal Bangladesh (ICT-BD) assisted to Reconcile Society? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T02%3A26%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Has%20the%20International%20Crimes%20Tribunal%20Bangladesh%20(ICT-BD)%20assisted%20to%20Reconcile%20Society?&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Universitatis%20Danubius.%20Juridica&rft.au=Mustakimur,%20Rahman%20Md&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=115&rft.epage=149&rft.pages=115-149&rft.issn=1844-8062&rft.eissn=2065-3891&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E1180785%3C/ceeol%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_11807853%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1180785&rfr_iscdi=true |