Loading…
Envisioning the Ecological Future: Three Perspectives off the Beaten Track
With few truly hopeful visions currently emerging from mainstream academia or from established science concerning humanity’s collective environmental outlook, it might be necessary to go off the beaten track in order to see how we can maintain a sense of hope while realistically preparing for the gr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Text matters (Łódź) 2023-11 (13), p.417-441 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-20799d7a0b2008931eaef895783d04e586192af852d97a97b7d1be9958483f0b3 |
container_end_page | 441 |
container_issue | 13 |
container_start_page | 417 |
container_title | Text matters (Łódź) |
container_volume | |
creator | Arnsperger, Christian Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka |
description | With few truly hopeful visions currently emerging from mainstream academia or from established science concerning humanity’s collective environmental outlook, it might be necessary to go off the beaten track in order to see how we can maintain a sense of hope while realistically preparing for the gradual erosion of the world as we know it, therefore also leaving some psychological and emotional room for a sense of the tragic. This essay considers three lesser-known but, in our eyes, important contemporary perspectives on the ecological future: Ernest Callenbach’s “ecotopia,” John Michael Greer’s “catabolic descent” and William deBuys’s “hospice for Earth”—all three of which aim to challenge the currently still dominant focus on the binary of “progress or apocalypse” that flows from modern thought. We critically examine these visions and argue that, when combined, they offer an approach to the ecological future that is both more realistic and more inspiring. In essence, Callenbach’s ecotopian vision still has significant traction—and an almost “erotic” appeal—today, but needs to be adapted to contemporary ecological realities through Greer’s and deBuys’s insights into decline, grief and the tragic. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18778/2083-2931.13.22 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_1206948</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>1206948</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_ac4814a74c684ff2937b952da21f763a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1206948</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-20799d7a0b2008931eaef895783d04e586192af852d97a97b7d1be9958483f0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkcFLwzAUxosoOObuXoSC584kTZvEm45NJwM9TPAW0vRl66zNTNqB_71ZOzSXF9773i8v34uia4ymmDPG7wjiaUJEiqc4nRJyFo1ChiYZox_n_X2oXkYT73coHMYE4nwUvcybQ-Ur21TNJm63EM-1re2m0qqOF13bObiP11sHEL-B83vQbXUAH1tjevUjqBaaeO2U_ryKLoyqPUxOcRy9L-br2XOyen1azh5WiSactglBTIiSKVQQhHgYChQYLjLG0xJRyHiOBVGGZ6QUTAlWsBIXIETGKU8NKtJxtBy4pVU7uXfVl3I_0qpK9gnrNlK5ttI1SKUpx1QxqnNOjQkWsEIEsCLYsDxVgXU7sPbOfnfgW7mznWvC-JIIhAUnFNOgQoNKO-u9A_P3KkayX4A8WiyPFkscIgktN6cWAFv_UzFBuQgf-QVM2H9J</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2901982414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Envisioning the Ecological Future: Three Perspectives off the Beaten Track</title><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Arnsperger, Christian ; Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnsperger, Christian ; Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><description>With few truly hopeful visions currently emerging from mainstream academia or from established science concerning humanity’s collective environmental outlook, it might be necessary to go off the beaten track in order to see how we can maintain a sense of hope while realistically preparing for the gradual erosion of the world as we know it, therefore also leaving some psychological and emotional room for a sense of the tragic. This essay considers three lesser-known but, in our eyes, important contemporary perspectives on the ecological future: Ernest Callenbach’s “ecotopia,” John Michael Greer’s “catabolic descent” and William deBuys’s “hospice for Earth”—all three of which aim to challenge the currently still dominant focus on the binary of “progress or apocalypse” that flows from modern thought. We critically examine these visions and argue that, when combined, they offer an approach to the ecological future that is both more realistic and more inspiring. In essence, Callenbach’s ecotopian vision still has significant traction—and an almost “erotic” appeal—today, but needs to be adapted to contemporary ecological realities through Greer’s and deBuys’s insights into decline, grief and the tragic.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2083-2931</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2084-574X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18778/2083-2931.13.22</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lódz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</publisher><subject>apocalypse ; catabolic decline ; Climate change ; critique of modernity ; critique of progress ; Earth ; eco-grief ; ecological future ; ecotopia ; ernest callenbach ; hospicing earth ; Human nature ; Ideology ; john michael greer ; Narratives ; Popular culture ; Studies of Literature ; william debuys</subject><ispartof>Text matters (Łódź), 2023-11 (13), p.417-441</ispartof><rights>2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-20799d7a0b2008931eaef895783d04e586192af852d97a97b7d1be9958483f0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9451-5405 ; 0000-0001-7474-1205</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2023_79544.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2901982414/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2901982414?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916,62650,62651,62666,73957</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnsperger, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><title>Envisioning the Ecological Future: Three Perspectives off the Beaten Track</title><title>Text matters (Łódź)</title><addtitle>Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture</addtitle><description>With few truly hopeful visions currently emerging from mainstream academia or from established science concerning humanity’s collective environmental outlook, it might be necessary to go off the beaten track in order to see how we can maintain a sense of hope while realistically preparing for the gradual erosion of the world as we know it, therefore also leaving some psychological and emotional room for a sense of the tragic. This essay considers three lesser-known but, in our eyes, important contemporary perspectives on the ecological future: Ernest Callenbach’s “ecotopia,” John Michael Greer’s “catabolic descent” and William deBuys’s “hospice for Earth”—all three of which aim to challenge the currently still dominant focus on the binary of “progress or apocalypse” that flows from modern thought. We critically examine these visions and argue that, when combined, they offer an approach to the ecological future that is both more realistic and more inspiring. In essence, Callenbach’s ecotopian vision still has significant traction—and an almost “erotic” appeal—today, but needs to be adapted to contemporary ecological realities through Greer’s and deBuys’s insights into decline, grief and the tragic.</description><subject>apocalypse</subject><subject>catabolic decline</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>critique of modernity</subject><subject>critique of progress</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>eco-grief</subject><subject>ecological future</subject><subject>ecotopia</subject><subject>ernest callenbach</subject><subject>hospicing earth</subject><subject>Human nature</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>john michael greer</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Popular culture</subject><subject>Studies of Literature</subject><subject>william debuys</subject><issn>2083-2931</issn><issn>2084-574X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkcFLwzAUxosoOObuXoSC584kTZvEm45NJwM9TPAW0vRl66zNTNqB_71ZOzSXF9773i8v34uia4ymmDPG7wjiaUJEiqc4nRJyFo1ChiYZox_n_X2oXkYT73coHMYE4nwUvcybQ-Ur21TNJm63EM-1re2m0qqOF13bObiP11sHEL-B83vQbXUAH1tjevUjqBaaeO2U_ryKLoyqPUxOcRy9L-br2XOyen1azh5WiSactglBTIiSKVQQhHgYChQYLjLG0xJRyHiOBVGGZ6QUTAlWsBIXIETGKU8NKtJxtBy4pVU7uXfVl3I_0qpK9gnrNlK5ttI1SKUpx1QxqnNOjQkWsEIEsCLYsDxVgXU7sPbOfnfgW7mznWvC-JIIhAUnFNOgQoNKO-u9A_P3KkayX4A8WiyPFkscIgktN6cWAFv_UzFBuQgf-QVM2H9J</recordid><startdate>20231127</startdate><enddate>20231127</enddate><creator>Arnsperger, Christian</creator><creator>Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka</creator><general>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</general><general>Lodz University Press</general><general>University of Łódź</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>CLO</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>PAF</scope><scope>PPXUT</scope><scope>PQLNA</scope><scope>PROLI</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-5405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-1205</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231127</creationdate><title>Envisioning the Ecological Future: Three Perspectives off the Beaten Track</title><author>Arnsperger, Christian ; Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-20799d7a0b2008931eaef895783d04e586192af852d97a97b7d1be9958483f0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>apocalypse</topic><topic>catabolic decline</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>critique of modernity</topic><topic>critique of progress</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>eco-grief</topic><topic>ecological future</topic><topic>ecotopia</topic><topic>ernest callenbach</topic><topic>hospicing earth</topic><topic>Human nature</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>john michael greer</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Popular culture</topic><topic>Studies of Literature</topic><topic>william debuys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnsperger, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Core (LION Core) (legacy)</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Learning: Literature</collection><collection>Literature Online Premium (LION Premium) (legacy)</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION) - US Customers Only</collection><collection>Literature Online (LION eBooks)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Text matters (Łódź)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnsperger, Christian</au><au>Soltysik Monnet, Agnieszka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Envisioning the Ecological Future: Three Perspectives off the Beaten Track</atitle><jtitle>Text matters (Łódź)</jtitle><addtitle>Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture</addtitle><date>2023-11-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issue>13</issue><spage>417</spage><epage>441</epage><pages>417-441</pages><issn>2083-2931</issn><eissn>2084-574X</eissn><abstract>With few truly hopeful visions currently emerging from mainstream academia or from established science concerning humanity’s collective environmental outlook, it might be necessary to go off the beaten track in order to see how we can maintain a sense of hope while realistically preparing for the gradual erosion of the world as we know it, therefore also leaving some psychological and emotional room for a sense of the tragic. This essay considers three lesser-known but, in our eyes, important contemporary perspectives on the ecological future: Ernest Callenbach’s “ecotopia,” John Michael Greer’s “catabolic descent” and William deBuys’s “hospice for Earth”—all three of which aim to challenge the currently still dominant focus on the binary of “progress or apocalypse” that flows from modern thought. We critically examine these visions and argue that, when combined, they offer an approach to the ecological future that is both more realistic and more inspiring. In essence, Callenbach’s ecotopian vision still has significant traction—and an almost “erotic” appeal—today, but needs to be adapted to contemporary ecological realities through Greer’s and deBuys’s insights into decline, grief and the tragic.</abstract><cop>Lódz</cop><pub>Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego</pub><doi>10.18778/2083-2931.13.22</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9451-5405</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-1205</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2083-2931 |
ispartof | Text matters (Łódź), 2023-11 (13), p.417-441 |
issn | 2083-2931 2084-574X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_1206948 |
source | ProQuest One Literature |
subjects | apocalypse catabolic decline Climate change critique of modernity critique of progress Earth eco-grief ecological future ecotopia ernest callenbach hospicing earth Human nature Ideology john michael greer Narratives Popular culture Studies of Literature william debuys |
title | Envisioning the Ecological Future: Three Perspectives off the Beaten Track |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T00%3A21%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Envisioning%20the%20Ecological%20Future:%20Three%20Perspectives%20off%20the%20Beaten%20Track&rft.jtitle=Text%20matters%20(%C5%81o%CC%81dz%CC%81)&rft.au=Arnsperger,%20Christian&rft.date=2023-11-27&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=417&rft.epage=441&rft.pages=417-441&rft.issn=2083-2931&rft.eissn=2084-574X&rft_id=info:doi/10.18778/2083-2931.13.22&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_proqu%3E1206948%3C/ceeol_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-20799d7a0b2008931eaef895783d04e586192af852d97a97b7d1be9958483f0b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2901982414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=1206948&rfr_iscdi=true |