Milliyetçiliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararasi Ilişkilerde Belirsiz Kavram

It is rather difficult to pin down the meaning when one considers the veritable plethora of problems that the concept of nationalism presents. The foremost difficulty is the lack of a common understanding among scholars and academics about the problems that emanate from the definitions of nationalis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alternatif politika 2010, Vol.2 (2), p.151-174
Main Author: Hürsoy, Siret
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
International relations/trade
Nationalism Studies
Politics and Identity
Politics and society
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 174
container_issue 2
container_start_page 151
container_title Alternatif politika
container_volume 2
creator Hürsoy, Siret
description It is rather difficult to pin down the meaning when one considers the veritable plethora of problems that the concept of nationalism presents. The foremost difficulty is the lack of a common understanding among scholars and academics about the problems that emanate from the definitions of nationalism. In order to rethink and analyse the hazy concept of nationalism, the evolution of the concept of nationalism from being a natural phase in the evolution of human society to the argument of it being a constructed complex mythology, as held by Ernest Gellner, Benedict Anderson, Anthony D. Smith, Eric J. Hobsbawm, and James Mayall, will be the general focus of this article. This article will however concentrate on analysing the rationalisation of the “mythical construct” argument by examining the most important three precepts – ethnicity, culture and language – posited and then reach to a conclusion by manifesting how these have served and are continuing to serve as ethical and moral problems for international relations.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_569755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>569755</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>569755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_5697553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDaw1DUwtTTmYOAtLs4yMDAwsjA1MzM15mTw983MycmsTC05vDwzJ_PI_EyFyNS8zJTUPAWXw3uOzj-8Jy83NdtKITSntDgnsQgIizMVPHMyj87PzsxJLUpJVXBKzcksKs6sUvBOLCtKzOVhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66yamp-TnxWfmlRXlA8XhTM0tzU1NjAtIA9AQ-eA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Milliyetçiliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararasi Ilişkilerde Belirsiz Kavram</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><creator>Hürsoy, Siret</creator><creatorcontrib>Hürsoy, Siret</creatorcontrib><description>It is rather difficult to pin down the meaning when one considers the veritable plethora of problems that the concept of nationalism presents. The foremost difficulty is the lack of a common understanding among scholars and academics about the problems that emanate from the definitions of nationalism. In order to rethink and analyse the hazy concept of nationalism, the evolution of the concept of nationalism from being a natural phase in the evolution of human society to the argument of it being a constructed complex mythology, as held by Ernest Gellner, Benedict Anderson, Anthony D. Smith, Eric J. Hobsbawm, and James Mayall, will be the general focus of this article. This article will however concentrate on analysing the rationalisation of the “mythical construct” argument by examining the most important three precepts – ethnicity, culture and language – posited and then reach to a conclusion by manifesting how these have served and are continuing to serve as ethical and moral problems for international relations.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1309-0593</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rasim Özgür DÖNMEZ</publisher><subject>International relations/trade ; Nationalism Studies ; Politics and Identity ; Politics and society</subject><ispartof>Alternatif politika, 2010, Vol.2 (2), p.151-174</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2010_34715.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hürsoy, Siret</creatorcontrib><title>Milliyetçiliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararasi Ilişkilerde Belirsiz Kavram</title><title>Alternatif politika</title><addtitle>Alternative Politics</addtitle><description>It is rather difficult to pin down the meaning when one considers the veritable plethora of problems that the concept of nationalism presents. The foremost difficulty is the lack of a common understanding among scholars and academics about the problems that emanate from the definitions of nationalism. In order to rethink and analyse the hazy concept of nationalism, the evolution of the concept of nationalism from being a natural phase in the evolution of human society to the argument of it being a constructed complex mythology, as held by Ernest Gellner, Benedict Anderson, Anthony D. Smith, Eric J. Hobsbawm, and James Mayall, will be the general focus of this article. This article will however concentrate on analysing the rationalisation of the “mythical construct” argument by examining the most important three precepts – ethnicity, culture and language – posited and then reach to a conclusion by manifesting how these have served and are continuing to serve as ethical and moral problems for international relations.</description><subject>International relations/trade</subject><subject>Nationalism Studies</subject><subject>Politics and Identity</subject><subject>Politics and society</subject><issn>1309-0593</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDaw1DUwtTTmYOAtLs4yMDAwsjA1MzM15mTw983MycmsTC05vDwzJ_PI_EyFyNS8zJTUPAWXw3uOzj-8Jy83NdtKITSntDgnsQgIizMVPHMyj87PzsxJLUpJVXBKzcksKs6sUvBOLCtKzOVhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66yamp-TnxWfmlRXlA8XhTM0tzU1NjAtIA9AQ-eA</recordid><startdate>2010</startdate><enddate>2010</enddate><creator>Hürsoy, Siret</creator><general>Rasim Özgür DÖNMEZ</general><general>Rasim Ozgur DONMEZ</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2010</creationdate><title>Milliyetçiliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararasi Ilişkilerde Belirsiz Kavram</title><author>Hürsoy, Siret</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_5697553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>International relations/trade</topic><topic>Nationalism Studies</topic><topic>Politics and Identity</topic><topic>Politics and society</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hürsoy, Siret</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library - CEEOL Journals</collection><jtitle>Alternatif politika</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hürsoy, Siret</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Milliyetçiliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararasi Ilişkilerde Belirsiz Kavram</atitle><jtitle>Alternatif politika</jtitle><addtitle>Alternative Politics</addtitle><date>2010</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>151</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>151-174</pages><eissn>1309-0593</eissn><abstract>It is rather difficult to pin down the meaning when one considers the veritable plethora of problems that the concept of nationalism presents. The foremost difficulty is the lack of a common understanding among scholars and academics about the problems that emanate from the definitions of nationalism. In order to rethink and analyse the hazy concept of nationalism, the evolution of the concept of nationalism from being a natural phase in the evolution of human society to the argument of it being a constructed complex mythology, as held by Ernest Gellner, Benedict Anderson, Anthony D. Smith, Eric J. Hobsbawm, and James Mayall, will be the general focus of this article. This article will however concentrate on analysing the rationalisation of the “mythical construct” argument by examining the most important three precepts – ethnicity, culture and language – posited and then reach to a conclusion by manifesting how these have served and are continuing to serve as ethical and moral problems for international relations.</abstract><pub>Rasim Özgür DÖNMEZ</pub><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1309-0593
ispartof Alternatif politika, 2010, Vol.2 (2), p.151-174
issn 1309-0593
language eng
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_569755
source Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection
subjects International relations/trade
Nationalism Studies
Politics and Identity
Politics and society
title Milliyetçiliği Yeniden Düşünmek: Uluslararasi Ilişkilerde Belirsiz Kavram
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T13%3A07%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Milliyet%C3%A7ili%C4%9Fi%20Yeniden%20D%C3%BC%C5%9F%C3%BCnmek:%20Uluslararasi%20Ili%C5%9Fkilerde%20Belirsiz%20Kavram&rft.jtitle=Alternatif%20politika&rft.au=H%C3%BCrsoy,%20Siret&rft.date=2010&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=151&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=151-174&rft.eissn=1309-0593&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E569755%3C/ceeol%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_5697553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=569755&rfr_iscdi=true