Loading…

Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków

The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Roczniki humanistyczne 2020, Vol.68 (3), p.37-56
Main Author: Marchewka, Anna
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 56
container_issue 3
container_start_page 37
container_title Roczniki humanistyczne
container_volume 68
creator Marchewka, Anna
description The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_877687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>877687</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>877687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_8776873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDA21TU3NzDnYOAtLs4yAAIzC1MTA0NOhnDv4tS8_LT8vBKFcoWczOKSxOQMhYDi1NKUfF24VKJCflFiFVBBWmZ2cmVWXiVQDUxtcH52UWJJanGiQqZCMZhdmX14czkPA2taYk5xKi-U5maQcXMNcfbQTU5Nzc-Jz8ovLcoDisdbmJubWZgbE5AGAE0FPoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków</title><source>MLA International Bibliography with Full Text</source><creator>Marchewka, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-7707</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin</publisher><subject>Ancient World ; History ; Language and Literature Studies ; Philology</subject><ispartof>Roczniki humanistyczne, 2020, Vol.68 (3), p.37-56</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2020_55151.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków</title><title>Roczniki humanistyczne</title><addtitle>Annals of Arts</addtitle><description>The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics.</description><subject>Ancient World</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Language and Literature Studies</subject><subject>Philology</subject><issn>0035-7707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDA21TU3NzDnYOAtLs4yAAIzC1MTA0NOhnDv4tS8_LT8vBKFcoWczOKSxOQMhYDi1NKUfF24VKJCflFiFVBBWmZ2cmVWXiVQDUxtcH52UWJJanGiQqZCMZhdmX14czkPA2taYk5xKi-U5maQcXMNcfbQTU5Nzc-Jz8ovLcoDisdbmJubWZgbE5AGAE0FPoE</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Marchewka, Anna</creator><general>The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin</general><general>Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków</title><author>Marchewka, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_8776873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ancient World</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Language and Literature Studies</topic><topic>Philology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Roczniki humanistyczne</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marchewka, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków</atitle><jtitle>Roczniki humanistyczne</jtitle><addtitle>Annals of Arts</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>37-56</pages><issn>0035-7707</issn><abstract>The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics.</abstract><pub>The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin</pub><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-7707
ispartof Roczniki humanistyczne, 2020, Vol.68 (3), p.37-56
issn 0035-7707
language pol
recordid cdi_ceeol_journals_877687
source MLA International Bibliography with Full Text
subjects Ancient World
History
Language and Literature Studies
Philology
title Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A27%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ksenofont%20w%20listach%20Pseudo-Ksenofonta%20oraz%20w%20fikcyjnych%20listach%20Sokratesa%20i%20sokratyk%C3%B3w&rft.jtitle=Roczniki%20humanistyczne&rft.au=Marchewka,%20Anna&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=37-56&rft.issn=0035-7707&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E877687%3C/ceeol%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_8776873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=877687&rfr_iscdi=true