Loading…
Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków
The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on...
Saved in:
Published in: | Roczniki humanistyczne 2020, Vol.68 (3), p.37-56 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | Polish |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 56 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | Roczniki humanistyczne |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Marchewka, Anna |
description | The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_877687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>877687</ceeol_id><sourcerecordid>877687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ceeol_journals_8776873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDA21TU3NzDnYOAtLs4yAAIzC1MTA0NOhnDv4tS8_LT8vBKFcoWczOKSxOQMhYDi1NKUfF24VKJCflFiFVBBWmZ2cmVWXiVQDUxtcH52UWJJanGiQqZCMZhdmX14czkPA2taYk5xKi-U5maQcXMNcfbQTU5Nzc-Jz8ovLcoDisdbmJubWZgbE5AGAE0FPoE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków</title><source>MLA International Bibliography with Full Text</source><creator>Marchewka, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-7707</identifier><language>pol</language><publisher>The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin</publisher><subject>Ancient World ; History ; Language and Literature Studies ; Philology</subject><ispartof>Roczniki humanistyczne, 2020, Vol.68 (3), p.37-56</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2020_55151.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków</title><title>Roczniki humanistyczne</title><addtitle>Annals of Arts</addtitle><description>The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics.</description><subject>Ancient World</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Language and Literature Studies</subject><subject>Philology</subject><issn>0035-7707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDA21TU3NzDnYOAtLs4yAAIzC1MTA0NOhnDv4tS8_LT8vBKFcoWczOKSxOQMhYDi1NKUfF24VKJCflFiFVBBWmZ2cmVWXiVQDUxtcH52UWJJanGiQqZCMZhdmX14czkPA2taYk5xKi-U5maQcXMNcfbQTU5Nzc-Jz8ovLcoDisdbmJubWZgbE5AGAE0FPoE</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Marchewka, Anna</creator><general>The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin</general><general>Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków</title><author>Marchewka, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_8776873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>pol</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Ancient World</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Language and Literature Studies</topic><topic>Philology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marchewka, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><jtitle>Roczniki humanistyczne</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marchewka, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków</atitle><jtitle>Roczniki humanistyczne</jtitle><addtitle>Annals of Arts</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>56</epage><pages>37-56</pages><issn>0035-7707</issn><abstract>The aim of the analysis of the apocryphal correspondence of Pseudo-Xenophon, which tradition has given us with two independent paths—7 excerpts preserved in the Anthology by Stobaeus and 6 entire letters included in the Socratis et Socraticorum epistole (ed. R. Hercher)—is an attempt to delineate on their basis, a portrait of Xenophon, commonly accepted in the time of the Roman Empire. Pseudo-Xenophon letters clearly define the creator of Anabasis as the philosopher of Socratic, basically keeping silent about his historical work. They give us testimony to his thought, deeply rooted in Socratic ethics, focused on kalokagathia. Continuous pursuit of virtue through consistent improvement not only in pure ethics, but also in specific skills that are supposed to bring benefits, pointed to the key importance of paideia in Xenophont’s work as a pupil of Socrates. In these letters, the reference points are mostly ἐγκράτεια, καρτερία, ἀνδρεία, εὐσέβεια, φιλανθρωπία and finally σωφροσύνη, i.e. the virtues that form the core of Socratic ethics.</abstract><pub>The Learned Society of the Catholic University of Lublin John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin</pub><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0035-7707 |
ispartof | Roczniki humanistyczne, 2020, Vol.68 (3), p.37-56 |
issn | 0035-7707 |
language | pol |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_877687 |
source | MLA International Bibliography with Full Text |
subjects | Ancient World History Language and Literature Studies Philology |
title | Ksenofont w listach Pseudo-Ksenofonta oraz w fikcyjnych listach Sokratesa i sokratyków |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A27%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ksenofont%20w%20listach%20Pseudo-Ksenofonta%20oraz%20w%20fikcyjnych%20listach%20Sokratesa%20i%20sokratyk%C3%B3w&rft.jtitle=Roczniki%20humanistyczne&rft.au=Marchewka,%20Anna&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=56&rft.pages=37-56&rft.issn=0035-7707&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cceeol%3E877687%3C/ceeol%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-ceeol_journals_8776873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=877687&rfr_iscdi=true |