Loading…
MICRO BUSINESSES PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EVIDENCE FROM UKRAINE
The purpose of this study is to test 3 hypotheses concerning the participation of private entrepreneurs in a procurement made via Ukrainian online public procurement system ProZorro. The research based on the ProZorro professional analytics module which is an online instrument for aggregation, sorti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Economics & sociology 2019-01, Vol.12 (3), p.98-113 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-ca49649b63dfb53745699a0f40395940554ecdc8e299c04141289c480d284cfb3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 113 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 98 |
container_title | Economics & sociology |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Medzhybovska, Nataliia Lew, Agnieszka |
description | The purpose of this study is to test 3 hypotheses concerning the participation of private entrepreneurs in a procurement made via Ukrainian online public procurement system ProZorro. The research based on the ProZorro professional analytics module which is an online instrument for aggregation, sorting and other processing of machine-readable data on public procurement in Ukraine and uses data as of 2017 (the first year of ProZorro operations). The article uses the methods of systematic scientific literature analysis, general and logical analysis, comparison, summation and abstraction as well as mathematical and statistical processing methods. Situation analysis is based on the data of ProZorro professional analytics module and the State Statistics Service of Ukraine and the results of statistical calculations.The first hypothesis suggests that private entrepreneurs are most active in sub-threshold (small) procurement procedures and this hypothesis was refuted by the results of the study. We found that private entrepreneurs are the full-scale participants of competitive procurement procedures and are actively involved in over-threshold (large) competitive procedures. The second hypothesis assumes that participation of private entrepreneurs in public procurement would increase the competitiveness of procurement procedures, and this has been fully confirmed by the obtained results. The third hypothesis concerns territorial localization of private entrepreneurs' activities. It was suggested that private entrepreneurs are more active locally, i.e. more involved to the procurement procedures conducted by government authorities within their own region, and this hypothesis has been confirmed only for the simplest procurement procedures namely contract reporting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-3/7 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ceeol_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ceeol_journals_977076</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ceeol_id>977076</ceeol_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_9ac33ba790934d93aaac8fa7daf59c4d</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>977076</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-ca49649b63dfb53745699a0f40395940554ecdc8e299c04141289c480d284cfb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU9v2kAQxa2qlRqRfIOospRrDftn1uvpDVyTrgI2MrjKbbXetSsiWlMbDvn2WQJpLzntaOe934zeBMEXSsYUmIAJI5JGMsHHMSMUJ5RFfCI_BFeMkzjiIPCjr980n4ObYdjWhMUoAUh8FTwsVVoW4axaqzxbr7N1uJqWG5Wq1XSjijxUebiqZguVhquySKsyW2b55luY_VTfszzNwnlZLMPqoZx6-3XwqTW7obm5vKOgmmeb9Ee0KO5VOl1EFoQ4RNYAxoB1zF1bCy5BxIiGtEA4CgQiBDTW2aRhiJYABcoStJAQxxKwbc1HgTpzXWee9L7f_jb9s-7MVr9-dP0vbfrD1u4ajcZyXhuJBDk45MYYm7RGOtMKz3SedXdm7fvu77EZDvqpO_Z__PqacUqYD0kSr4rPKtt3w9A37b-plOjXO-hTxvqUsT7dQVOmuZbeeHsxNk23-89GKYmMffvru-239V1nL1K9dy1_AZCsjJM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310240670</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MICRO BUSINESSES PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EVIDENCE FROM UKRAINE</title><source>EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Medzhybovska, Nataliia ; Lew, Agnieszka</creator><creatorcontrib>Medzhybovska, Nataliia ; Lew, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study is to test 3 hypotheses concerning the participation of private entrepreneurs in a procurement made via Ukrainian online public procurement system ProZorro. The research based on the ProZorro professional analytics module which is an online instrument for aggregation, sorting and other processing of machine-readable data on public procurement in Ukraine and uses data as of 2017 (the first year of ProZorro operations). The article uses the methods of systematic scientific literature analysis, general and logical analysis, comparison, summation and abstraction as well as mathematical and statistical processing methods. Situation analysis is based on the data of ProZorro professional analytics module and the State Statistics Service of Ukraine and the results of statistical calculations.The first hypothesis suggests that private entrepreneurs are most active in sub-threshold (small) procurement procedures and this hypothesis was refuted by the results of the study. We found that private entrepreneurs are the full-scale participants of competitive procurement procedures and are actively involved in over-threshold (large) competitive procedures. The second hypothesis assumes that participation of private entrepreneurs in public procurement would increase the competitiveness of procurement procedures, and this has been fully confirmed by the obtained results. The third hypothesis concerns territorial localization of private entrepreneurs' activities. It was suggested that private entrepreneurs are more active locally, i.e. more involved to the procurement procedures conducted by government authorities within their own region, and this hypothesis has been confirmed only for the simplest procurement procedures namely contract reporting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-789X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2306-3459</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-3/7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ternopil: Centre of Sociological Research</publisher><subject>Business Economy / Management ; Competition ; competitive procedures ; Cost analysis ; Data processing ; Electronic procurement ; Entrepreneurs ; Government contracts ; Government purchasing ; Hypotheses ; International finance ; Internet ; Legislation ; Micro-Economics ; National Economy ; open tenders ; Participation ; Principles ; private entrepreneurs ; ProZorro ; public procurement ; Public sector ; Small & medium sized enterprises-SME ; Statistics ; Studies ; Success</subject><ispartof>Economics & sociology, 2019-01, Vol.12 (3), p.98-113</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-ca49649b63dfb53745699a0f40395940554ecdc8e299c04141289c480d284cfb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://www.ceeol.com//api/image/getissuecoverimage?id=picture_2019_62775.png</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2310240670/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2310240670?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,21373,21374,25731,27321,27843,27901,27902,33588,33751,34507,36037,36989,43709,44091,44339,44566,74192,74609,74865,75096</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Medzhybovska, Nataliia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><title>MICRO BUSINESSES PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EVIDENCE FROM UKRAINE</title><title>Economics & sociology</title><addtitle>Economics and Sociology</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study is to test 3 hypotheses concerning the participation of private entrepreneurs in a procurement made via Ukrainian online public procurement system ProZorro. The research based on the ProZorro professional analytics module which is an online instrument for aggregation, sorting and other processing of machine-readable data on public procurement in Ukraine and uses data as of 2017 (the first year of ProZorro operations). The article uses the methods of systematic scientific literature analysis, general and logical analysis, comparison, summation and abstraction as well as mathematical and statistical processing methods. Situation analysis is based on the data of ProZorro professional analytics module and the State Statistics Service of Ukraine and the results of statistical calculations.The first hypothesis suggests that private entrepreneurs are most active in sub-threshold (small) procurement procedures and this hypothesis was refuted by the results of the study. We found that private entrepreneurs are the full-scale participants of competitive procurement procedures and are actively involved in over-threshold (large) competitive procedures. The second hypothesis assumes that participation of private entrepreneurs in public procurement would increase the competitiveness of procurement procedures, and this has been fully confirmed by the obtained results. The third hypothesis concerns territorial localization of private entrepreneurs' activities. It was suggested that private entrepreneurs are more active locally, i.e. more involved to the procurement procedures conducted by government authorities within their own region, and this hypothesis has been confirmed only for the simplest procurement procedures namely contract reporting.</description><subject>Business Economy / Management</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>competitive procedures</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Electronic procurement</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Government contracts</subject><subject>Government purchasing</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>International finance</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Micro-Economics</subject><subject>National Economy</subject><subject>open tenders</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>private entrepreneurs</subject><subject>ProZorro</subject><subject>public procurement</subject><subject>Public sector</subject><subject>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Success</subject><issn>2071-789X</issn><issn>2306-3459</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU9v2kAQxa2qlRqRfIOospRrDftn1uvpDVyTrgI2MrjKbbXetSsiWlMbDvn2WQJpLzntaOe934zeBMEXSsYUmIAJI5JGMsHHMSMUJ5RFfCI_BFeMkzjiIPCjr980n4ObYdjWhMUoAUh8FTwsVVoW4axaqzxbr7N1uJqWG5Wq1XSjijxUebiqZguVhquySKsyW2b55luY_VTfszzNwnlZLMPqoZx6-3XwqTW7obm5vKOgmmeb9Ee0KO5VOl1EFoQ4RNYAxoB1zF1bCy5BxIiGtEA4CgQiBDTW2aRhiJYABcoStJAQxxKwbc1HgTpzXWee9L7f_jb9s-7MVr9-dP0vbfrD1u4ajcZyXhuJBDk45MYYm7RGOtMKz3SedXdm7fvu77EZDvqpO_Z__PqacUqYD0kSr4rPKtt3w9A37b-plOjXO-hTxvqUsT7dQVOmuZbeeHsxNk23-89GKYmMffvru-239V1nL1K9dy1_AZCsjJM</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Medzhybovska, Nataliia</creator><creator>Lew, Agnieszka</creator><general>Centre of Sociological Research</general><general>Fundacja Centrum Badań Socjologicznych</general><general>Centre of Sociological Research (NGO)</general><general>Centre of Sociological Research, Szczecin, Poland</general><scope>AE2</scope><scope>BIXPP</scope><scope>REL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>POGQB</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PRQQA</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>MICRO BUSINESSES PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EVIDENCE FROM UKRAINE</title><author>Medzhybovska, Nataliia ; Lew, Agnieszka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-ca49649b63dfb53745699a0f40395940554ecdc8e299c04141289c480d284cfb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Business Economy / Management</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>competitive procedures</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Electronic procurement</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Government contracts</topic><topic>Government purchasing</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>International finance</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Micro-Economics</topic><topic>National Economy</topic><topic>open tenders</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>private entrepreneurs</topic><topic>ProZorro</topic><topic>public procurement</topic><topic>Public sector</topic><topic>Small & medium sized enterprises-SME</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Success</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Medzhybovska, Nataliia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lew, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library (C.E.E.O.L.) (DFG Nationallizenzen)</collection><collection>CEEOL: Open Access</collection><collection>Central and Eastern European Online Library</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Entrepreneurship Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Sociology & Social Sciences Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>TestCollectionTL3OpenAccess</collection><jtitle>Economics & sociology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Medzhybovska, Nataliia</au><au>Lew, Agnieszka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MICRO BUSINESSES PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EVIDENCE FROM UKRAINE</atitle><jtitle>Economics & sociology</jtitle><addtitle>Economics and Sociology</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>113</epage><pages>98-113</pages><issn>2071-789X</issn><eissn>2306-3459</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study is to test 3 hypotheses concerning the participation of private entrepreneurs in a procurement made via Ukrainian online public procurement system ProZorro. The research based on the ProZorro professional analytics module which is an online instrument for aggregation, sorting and other processing of machine-readable data on public procurement in Ukraine and uses data as of 2017 (the first year of ProZorro operations). The article uses the methods of systematic scientific literature analysis, general and logical analysis, comparison, summation and abstraction as well as mathematical and statistical processing methods. Situation analysis is based on the data of ProZorro professional analytics module and the State Statistics Service of Ukraine and the results of statistical calculations.The first hypothesis suggests that private entrepreneurs are most active in sub-threshold (small) procurement procedures and this hypothesis was refuted by the results of the study. We found that private entrepreneurs are the full-scale participants of competitive procurement procedures and are actively involved in over-threshold (large) competitive procedures. The second hypothesis assumes that participation of private entrepreneurs in public procurement would increase the competitiveness of procurement procedures, and this has been fully confirmed by the obtained results. The third hypothesis concerns territorial localization of private entrepreneurs' activities. It was suggested that private entrepreneurs are more active locally, i.e. more involved to the procurement procedures conducted by government authorities within their own region, and this hypothesis has been confirmed only for the simplest procurement procedures namely contract reporting.</abstract><cop>Ternopil</cop><pub>Centre of Sociological Research</pub><doi>10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-3/7</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-789X |
ispartof | Economics & sociology, 2019-01, Vol.12 (3), p.98-113 |
issn | 2071-789X 2306-3459 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ceeol_journals_977076 |
source | EBSCOhost Econlit with Full Text; Publicly Available Content Database; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Sociology Collection; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Business Economy / Management Competition competitive procedures Cost analysis Data processing Electronic procurement Entrepreneurs Government contracts Government purchasing Hypotheses International finance Internet Legislation Micro-Economics National Economy open tenders Participation Principles private entrepreneurs ProZorro public procurement Public sector Small & medium sized enterprises-SME Statistics Studies Success |
title | MICRO BUSINESSES PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT: EVIDENCE FROM UKRAINE |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A32%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ceeol_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MICRO%20BUSINESSES%20PARTICIPATION%20IN%20PUBLIC%20PROCUREMENT:%20EVIDENCE%20FROM%20UKRAINE&rft.jtitle=Economics%20&%20sociology&rft.au=Medzhybovska,%20Nataliia&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=113&rft.pages=98-113&rft.issn=2071-789X&rft.eissn=2306-3459&rft_id=info:doi/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-3/7&rft_dat=%3Cceeol_doaj_%3E977076%3C/ceeol_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c455t-ca49649b63dfb53745699a0f40395940554ecdc8e299c04141289c480d284cfb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310240670&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ceeol_id=977076&rfr_iscdi=true |