Loading…

Performance evaluation of operational atmospheric correction algorithms over the East China Seas

To acquire high-quality operational data products for Chinese in-orbit and scheduled ocean color sensors, the performances of two operational atmospheric correction(AC) algorithms(ESA MEGS 7.4.1 and NASA Sea DAS 6.1) were evaluated over the East China Seas(ECS) using MERIS data. The spectral remote...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:中国海洋湖沼学报:英文版 2017 (1), p.1-22
Main Author: 贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 22
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title 中国海洋湖沼学报:英文版
container_volume
creator 贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen
description To acquire high-quality operational data products for Chinese in-orbit and scheduled ocean color sensors, the performances of two operational atmospheric correction(AC) algorithms(ESA MEGS 7.4.1 and NASA Sea DAS 6.1) were evaluated over the East China Seas(ECS) using MERIS data. The spectral remote sensing reflectance Rrs(λ), aerosol optical thickness(AOT), and ?ngstr?m exponent(α) retrieved using the two algorithms were validated using in situ measurements obtained between May 2002 and October 2009. Match-ups of Rrs, AOT, and α between the in situ and MERIS data were obtained through strict exclusion criteria. Statistical analysis of Rrs(λ) showed a mean percentage difference(MPD) of 9%–13% in the 490–560 nm spectral range, and significant overestimation was observed at 413 nm(MPD>72%). The AOTs were overestimated(MPD>32%), and although the ESA algorithm outperformed the NASA algorithm in the blue-green bands, the situation was reversed in the red-near-infrared bands. The value of α was obviously underestimated by the ESA algorithm(MPD=41%) but not by the NASA algorithm(MPD=35%). To clarify why the NASA algorithm performed better in the retrieval of α, scatter plots of the α single scattering albedo(SSA) density were prepared. These α-SSA density scatter plots showed that the applicability of the aerosol models used by the NASA algorithm over the ECS is better than that used by the ESA algorithm, although neither aerosol model is suitable for the ECS region. The results of this study provide a reference to both data users and data agencies regarding the use of operational data products and the investigation into the improvement of current AC schemes over the ECS.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>chongqing</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_chongqing_primary_72897087504849554849484850</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>72897087504849554849484850</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>72897087504849554849484850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-chongqing_primary_728970875048495548494848503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdi01qwzAQhUVoIe7PHeYChmksYWsdErostPt0EGNLxda4IyXQ27cNPUEX7308-N7GNE_ed61DdDemwZ2zrUXnt-aulA_Ezlv0jXl_YR1FF8qBgS80n6kmySAjyMp6HTQD1UXKGllTgCCqHK4WzZNoqnEpIBdWqJHhQKXCPqZM8MpUHsztSHPhxz_em-54eNs_tyFKnj5Tnk6rpoX069TvBt_j0Du0g_XO_fZPBofd_17fr8dNkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance evaluation of operational atmospheric correction algorithms over the East China Seas</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>To acquire high-quality operational data products for Chinese in-orbit and scheduled ocean color sensors, the performances of two operational atmospheric correction(AC) algorithms(ESA MEGS 7.4.1 and NASA Sea DAS 6.1) were evaluated over the East China Seas(ECS) using MERIS data. The spectral remote sensing reflectance Rrs(λ), aerosol optical thickness(AOT), and ?ngstr?m exponent(α) retrieved using the two algorithms were validated using in situ measurements obtained between May 2002 and October 2009. Match-ups of Rrs, AOT, and α between the in situ and MERIS data were obtained through strict exclusion criteria. Statistical analysis of Rrs(λ) showed a mean percentage difference(MPD) of 9%–13% in the 490–560 nm spectral range, and significant overestimation was observed at 413 nm(MPD&amp;gt;72%). The AOTs were overestimated(MPD&amp;gt;32%), and although the ESA algorithm outperformed the NASA algorithm in the blue-green bands, the situation was reversed in the red-near-infrared bands. The value of α was obviously underestimated by the ESA algorithm(MPD=41%) but not by the NASA algorithm(MPD=35%). To clarify why the NASA algorithm performed better in the retrieval of α, scatter plots of the α single scattering albedo(SSA) density were prepared. These α-SSA density scatter plots showed that the applicability of the aerosol models used by the NASA algorithm over the ECS is better than that used by the ESA algorithm, although neither aerosol model is suitable for the ECS region. The results of this study provide a reference to both data users and data agencies regarding the use of operational data products and the investigation into the improvement of current AC schemes over the ECS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-4059</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-5005</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>中国海洋湖沼学报:英文版, 2017 (1), p.1-22</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/84119X/84119X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of operational atmospheric correction algorithms over the East China Seas</title><title>中国海洋湖沼学报:英文版</title><addtitle>Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology</addtitle><description>To acquire high-quality operational data products for Chinese in-orbit and scheduled ocean color sensors, the performances of two operational atmospheric correction(AC) algorithms(ESA MEGS 7.4.1 and NASA Sea DAS 6.1) were evaluated over the East China Seas(ECS) using MERIS data. The spectral remote sensing reflectance Rrs(λ), aerosol optical thickness(AOT), and ?ngstr?m exponent(α) retrieved using the two algorithms were validated using in situ measurements obtained between May 2002 and October 2009. Match-ups of Rrs, AOT, and α between the in situ and MERIS data were obtained through strict exclusion criteria. Statistical analysis of Rrs(λ) showed a mean percentage difference(MPD) of 9%–13% in the 490–560 nm spectral range, and significant overestimation was observed at 413 nm(MPD&amp;gt;72%). The AOTs were overestimated(MPD&amp;gt;32%), and although the ESA algorithm outperformed the NASA algorithm in the blue-green bands, the situation was reversed in the red-near-infrared bands. The value of α was obviously underestimated by the ESA algorithm(MPD=41%) but not by the NASA algorithm(MPD=35%). To clarify why the NASA algorithm performed better in the retrieval of α, scatter plots of the α single scattering albedo(SSA) density were prepared. These α-SSA density scatter plots showed that the applicability of the aerosol models used by the NASA algorithm over the ECS is better than that used by the ESA algorithm, although neither aerosol model is suitable for the ECS region. The results of this study provide a reference to both data users and data agencies regarding the use of operational data products and the investigation into the improvement of current AC schemes over the ECS.</description><issn>0254-4059</issn><issn>1993-5005</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdi01qwzAQhUVoIe7PHeYChmksYWsdErostPt0EGNLxda4IyXQ27cNPUEX7308-N7GNE_ed61DdDemwZ2zrUXnt-aulA_Ezlv0jXl_YR1FF8qBgS80n6kmySAjyMp6HTQD1UXKGllTgCCqHK4WzZNoqnEpIBdWqJHhQKXCPqZM8MpUHsztSHPhxz_em-54eNs_tyFKnj5Tnk6rpoX069TvBt_j0Du0g_XO_fZPBofd_17fr8dNkA</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen</creator><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of operational atmospheric correction algorithms over the East China Seas</title><author>贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-chongqing_primary_728970875048495548494848503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>维普_期刊</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-7.0平台</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><jtitle>中国海洋湖沼学报:英文版</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>贺双颜 贺明霞 FISCHER Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of operational atmospheric correction algorithms over the East China Seas</atitle><jtitle>中国海洋湖沼学报:英文版</jtitle><addtitle>Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology</addtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>22</epage><pages>1-22</pages><issn>0254-4059</issn><eissn>1993-5005</eissn><abstract>To acquire high-quality operational data products for Chinese in-orbit and scheduled ocean color sensors, the performances of two operational atmospheric correction(AC) algorithms(ESA MEGS 7.4.1 and NASA Sea DAS 6.1) were evaluated over the East China Seas(ECS) using MERIS data. The spectral remote sensing reflectance Rrs(λ), aerosol optical thickness(AOT), and ?ngstr?m exponent(α) retrieved using the two algorithms were validated using in situ measurements obtained between May 2002 and October 2009. Match-ups of Rrs, AOT, and α between the in situ and MERIS data were obtained through strict exclusion criteria. Statistical analysis of Rrs(λ) showed a mean percentage difference(MPD) of 9%–13% in the 490–560 nm spectral range, and significant overestimation was observed at 413 nm(MPD&amp;gt;72%). The AOTs were overestimated(MPD&amp;gt;32%), and although the ESA algorithm outperformed the NASA algorithm in the blue-green bands, the situation was reversed in the red-near-infrared bands. The value of α was obviously underestimated by the ESA algorithm(MPD=41%) but not by the NASA algorithm(MPD=35%). To clarify why the NASA algorithm performed better in the retrieval of α, scatter plots of the α single scattering albedo(SSA) density were prepared. These α-SSA density scatter plots showed that the applicability of the aerosol models used by the NASA algorithm over the ECS is better than that used by the ESA algorithm, although neither aerosol model is suitable for the ECS region. The results of this study provide a reference to both data users and data agencies regarding the use of operational data products and the investigation into the improvement of current AC schemes over the ECS.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-4059
ispartof 中国海洋湖沼学报:英文版, 2017 (1), p.1-22
issn 0254-4059
1993-5005
language eng
recordid cdi_chongqing_primary_72897087504849554849484850
source Springer Nature
title Performance evaluation of operational atmospheric correction algorithms over the East China Seas
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A41%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-chongqing&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20operational%20atmospheric%20correction%20algorithms%20over%20the%20East%20China%20Seas&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E6%B5%B7%E6%B4%8B%E6%B9%96%E6%B2%BC%E5%AD%A6%E6%8A%A5%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88&rft.au=%E8%B4%BA%E5%8F%8C%E9%A2%9C%20%E8%B4%BA%E6%98%8E%E9%9C%9E%20FISCHER%20J%C3%BCrgen&rft.date=2017&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=22&rft.pages=1-22&rft.issn=0254-4059&rft.eissn=1993-5005&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cchongqing%3E72897087504849554849484850%3C/chongqing%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-chongqing_primary_728970875048495548494848503%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=72897087504849554849484850&rfr_iscdi=true