Loading…

Evaluation of extraction protocols for anti-diabetic phytochemical substances from medicinal plants

AIM To examine the efficacy of three extraction techniques: Soxhlet-extraction(SE), cold-maceration(CM) and microwave-assisted-extraction(MAE) using 80% methanol as solvent. METHODS The study was performed on each of 50 g of Vernonia amygdalina(VA) and Occimum gratissimum(OG) leaves respectively. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:世界糖尿病杂志:英文版(电子版) 2016 (20), p.605-614
Main Author: Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 614
container_issue 20
container_start_page 605
container_title 世界糖尿病杂志:英文版(电子版)
container_volume
creator Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila
description AIM To examine the efficacy of three extraction techniques: Soxhlet-extraction(SE), cold-maceration(CM) and microwave-assisted-extraction(MAE) using 80% methanol as solvent. METHODS The study was performed on each of 50 g of Vernonia amygdalina(VA) and Occimum gratissimum(OG) leaves respectively. The percentage yield, duration of extraction, volume of solvent used, qualitative and quantitative phytoconstituents present was compared. The biological activities(hypoglycemic effect) were investigated using albino wistar rat model of diabetes mellitus(n = 36) with a combined dose(1:1) of the two plants leaf extracts(250 mg/kg b.w.) from the three methods. Theextracts were administered orally, once daily for 21 d.RESULTS In this report, the percentage VA extract yield from MAE was highest(20.9% ± 1.05%) within 39 min using 250 m L of solvent, when compared to the CM(14.35% ± 0.28%) within 4320 min using 900 m L of solvent and SE(15.75% ± 0.71%) within 265 min using 500 m L of solvent. The percentage differences in OG extract yield between: MAE vs SE was 41.05%; MAE vs CM was 46.81% and SE vs CM was 9.77%. The qualitative chemical analysis of the two plants showed no difference in the various phytoconstituents tested, but differs quantitatively in the amount of the individual phytoconstituents, as MAE had significantly high yield(P > 0.05) on phenolics, saponins and tannins. SE technique gave significantly high yield(P > 0.05) on alkaloid, while CM gave significant high yield on flavonoids. The extracts from CM exhibited a significantly(P > 0.05) better hypoglycemic activity within the first 14-d of treatment(43.3% ± 3.62%) when compared to MAE(36.5% ± 0.08%) and SE methods(33.3% ± 1.60%). However, the percentage hypoglycemic activity, 21 d post-treatment with 250 mg/kg b.w. extract from MAE was 72.6% ± 1.03% and it was more comparable to 10 mg/kg b.w. glibenclamide treated group(75.0% ± 0.73%), unlike the SE(69.5% ± 0.71%) and CM(69.1% ± 1.03%). CONCLUSION CM technique produces extract with better hypoglycemic activity, whereas; MAE is a better option for high yield of phytoconstituents using less solvent within a short time.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>chongqing</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_chongqing_primary_87746869504849545048484851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cqvip_id>87746869504849545048484851</cqvip_id><sourcerecordid>87746869504849545048484851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-chongqing_primary_877468695048495450484848513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdS8EKwjAUK6Kg6P6hPzCYrN3as0z8AO_yrN32pGtn24n7e4t48GxySEKSBdnsJRO5LLlY_vg1yUK4FwmMV1UpN0Q1TzATRHSWupbqV_SgPmn0LjrlTKCt8xRsxPyGcNURFR37OXW9HlCBoWG6hghW6TT1bqCDvqFCm5rRpF_YkVULJujsq1tSHpvz4ZSr3tnugba7jB4H8PNF1DWrRCV5wQSTnH00ke_L_15vv65P_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of extraction protocols for anti-diabetic phytochemical substances from medicinal plants</title><source>PubMed Central (Open Access)</source><creator>Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila</creatorcontrib><description>AIM To examine the efficacy of three extraction techniques: Soxhlet-extraction(SE), cold-maceration(CM) and microwave-assisted-extraction(MAE) using 80% methanol as solvent. METHODS The study was performed on each of 50 g of Vernonia amygdalina(VA) and Occimum gratissimum(OG) leaves respectively. The percentage yield, duration of extraction, volume of solvent used, qualitative and quantitative phytoconstituents present was compared. The biological activities(hypoglycemic effect) were investigated using albino wistar rat model of diabetes mellitus(n = 36) with a combined dose(1:1) of the two plants leaf extracts(250 mg/kg b.w.) from the three methods. Theextracts were administered orally, once daily for 21 d.RESULTS In this report, the percentage VA extract yield from MAE was highest(20.9% ± 1.05%) within 39 min using 250 m L of solvent, when compared to the CM(14.35% ± 0.28%) within 4320 min using 900 m L of solvent and SE(15.75% ± 0.71%) within 265 min using 500 m L of solvent. The percentage differences in OG extract yield between: MAE vs SE was 41.05%; MAE vs CM was 46.81% and SE vs CM was 9.77%. The qualitative chemical analysis of the two plants showed no difference in the various phytoconstituents tested, but differs quantitatively in the amount of the individual phytoconstituents, as MAE had significantly high yield(P &amp;gt; 0.05) on phenolics, saponins and tannins. SE technique gave significantly high yield(P &amp;gt; 0.05) on alkaloid, while CM gave significant high yield on flavonoids. The extracts from CM exhibited a significantly(P &amp;gt; 0.05) better hypoglycemic activity within the first 14-d of treatment(43.3% ± 3.62%) when compared to MAE(36.5% ± 0.08%) and SE methods(33.3% ± 1.60%). However, the percentage hypoglycemic activity, 21 d post-treatment with 250 mg/kg b.w. extract from MAE was 72.6% ± 1.03% and it was more comparable to 10 mg/kg b.w. glibenclamide treated group(75.0% ± 0.73%), unlike the SE(69.5% ± 0.71%) and CM(69.1% ± 1.03%). CONCLUSION CM technique produces extract with better hypoglycemic activity, whereas; MAE is a better option for high yield of phytoconstituents using less solvent within a short time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1948-9358</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1948-9358</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>世界糖尿病杂志:英文版(电子版), 2016 (20), p.605-614</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttp://image.cqvip.com/vip1000/qk/71418X/71418X.jpg</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of extraction protocols for anti-diabetic phytochemical substances from medicinal plants</title><title>世界糖尿病杂志:英文版(电子版)</title><addtitle>World Journal of Diabetes</addtitle><description>AIM To examine the efficacy of three extraction techniques: Soxhlet-extraction(SE), cold-maceration(CM) and microwave-assisted-extraction(MAE) using 80% methanol as solvent. METHODS The study was performed on each of 50 g of Vernonia amygdalina(VA) and Occimum gratissimum(OG) leaves respectively. The percentage yield, duration of extraction, volume of solvent used, qualitative and quantitative phytoconstituents present was compared. The biological activities(hypoglycemic effect) were investigated using albino wistar rat model of diabetes mellitus(n = 36) with a combined dose(1:1) of the two plants leaf extracts(250 mg/kg b.w.) from the three methods. Theextracts were administered orally, once daily for 21 d.RESULTS In this report, the percentage VA extract yield from MAE was highest(20.9% ± 1.05%) within 39 min using 250 m L of solvent, when compared to the CM(14.35% ± 0.28%) within 4320 min using 900 m L of solvent and SE(15.75% ± 0.71%) within 265 min using 500 m L of solvent. The percentage differences in OG extract yield between: MAE vs SE was 41.05%; MAE vs CM was 46.81% and SE vs CM was 9.77%. The qualitative chemical analysis of the two plants showed no difference in the various phytoconstituents tested, but differs quantitatively in the amount of the individual phytoconstituents, as MAE had significantly high yield(P &amp;gt; 0.05) on phenolics, saponins and tannins. SE technique gave significantly high yield(P &amp;gt; 0.05) on alkaloid, while CM gave significant high yield on flavonoids. The extracts from CM exhibited a significantly(P &amp;gt; 0.05) better hypoglycemic activity within the first 14-d of treatment(43.3% ± 3.62%) when compared to MAE(36.5% ± 0.08%) and SE methods(33.3% ± 1.60%). However, the percentage hypoglycemic activity, 21 d post-treatment with 250 mg/kg b.w. extract from MAE was 72.6% ± 1.03% and it was more comparable to 10 mg/kg b.w. glibenclamide treated group(75.0% ± 0.73%), unlike the SE(69.5% ± 0.71%) and CM(69.1% ± 1.03%). CONCLUSION CM technique produces extract with better hypoglycemic activity, whereas; MAE is a better option for high yield of phytoconstituents using less solvent within a short time.</description><issn>1948-9358</issn><issn>1948-9358</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqdS8EKwjAUK6Kg6P6hPzCYrN3as0z8AO_yrN32pGtn24n7e4t48GxySEKSBdnsJRO5LLlY_vg1yUK4FwmMV1UpN0Q1TzATRHSWupbqV_SgPmn0LjrlTKCt8xRsxPyGcNURFR37OXW9HlCBoWG6hghW6TT1bqCDvqFCm5rRpF_YkVULJujsq1tSHpvz4ZSr3tnugba7jB4H8PNF1DWrRCV5wQSTnH00ke_L_15vv65P_w</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila</creator><scope>2RA</scope><scope>92L</scope><scope>CQIGP</scope><scope>~WA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Evaluation of extraction protocols for anti-diabetic phytochemical substances from medicinal plants</title><author>Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-chongqing_primary_877468695048495450484848513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila</creatorcontrib><collection>维普_期刊</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库-CALIS站点</collection><collection>维普中文期刊数据库</collection><collection>中文科技期刊数据库- 镜像站点</collection><jtitle>世界糖尿病杂志:英文版(电子版)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanley Irobekhian Reuben Okoduwa Ismaila A Umar Dorcas B James Hajara M Inuwa James D Habila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of extraction protocols for anti-diabetic phytochemical substances from medicinal plants</atitle><jtitle>世界糖尿病杂志:英文版(电子版)</jtitle><addtitle>World Journal of Diabetes</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><issue>20</issue><spage>605</spage><epage>614</epage><pages>605-614</pages><issn>1948-9358</issn><eissn>1948-9358</eissn><abstract>AIM To examine the efficacy of three extraction techniques: Soxhlet-extraction(SE), cold-maceration(CM) and microwave-assisted-extraction(MAE) using 80% methanol as solvent. METHODS The study was performed on each of 50 g of Vernonia amygdalina(VA) and Occimum gratissimum(OG) leaves respectively. The percentage yield, duration of extraction, volume of solvent used, qualitative and quantitative phytoconstituents present was compared. The biological activities(hypoglycemic effect) were investigated using albino wistar rat model of diabetes mellitus(n = 36) with a combined dose(1:1) of the two plants leaf extracts(250 mg/kg b.w.) from the three methods. Theextracts were administered orally, once daily for 21 d.RESULTS In this report, the percentage VA extract yield from MAE was highest(20.9% ± 1.05%) within 39 min using 250 m L of solvent, when compared to the CM(14.35% ± 0.28%) within 4320 min using 900 m L of solvent and SE(15.75% ± 0.71%) within 265 min using 500 m L of solvent. The percentage differences in OG extract yield between: MAE vs SE was 41.05%; MAE vs CM was 46.81% and SE vs CM was 9.77%. The qualitative chemical analysis of the two plants showed no difference in the various phytoconstituents tested, but differs quantitatively in the amount of the individual phytoconstituents, as MAE had significantly high yield(P &amp;gt; 0.05) on phenolics, saponins and tannins. SE technique gave significantly high yield(P &amp;gt; 0.05) on alkaloid, while CM gave significant high yield on flavonoids. The extracts from CM exhibited a significantly(P &amp;gt; 0.05) better hypoglycemic activity within the first 14-d of treatment(43.3% ± 3.62%) when compared to MAE(36.5% ± 0.08%) and SE methods(33.3% ± 1.60%). However, the percentage hypoglycemic activity, 21 d post-treatment with 250 mg/kg b.w. extract from MAE was 72.6% ± 1.03% and it was more comparable to 10 mg/kg b.w. glibenclamide treated group(75.0% ± 0.73%), unlike the SE(69.5% ± 0.71%) and CM(69.1% ± 1.03%). CONCLUSION CM technique produces extract with better hypoglycemic activity, whereas; MAE is a better option for high yield of phytoconstituents using less solvent within a short time.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1948-9358
ispartof 世界糖尿病杂志:英文版(电子版), 2016 (20), p.605-614
issn 1948-9358
1948-9358
language eng
recordid cdi_chongqing_primary_87746869504849545048484851
source PubMed Central (Open Access)
title Evaluation of extraction protocols for anti-diabetic phytochemical substances from medicinal plants
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A40%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-chongqing&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20extraction%20protocols%20for%20anti-diabetic%20phytochemical%20substances%20from%20medicinal%20plants&rft.jtitle=%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E7%B3%96%E5%B0%BF%E7%97%85%E6%9D%82%E5%BF%97%EF%BC%9A%E8%8B%B1%E6%96%87%E7%89%88%EF%BC%88%E7%94%B5%E5%AD%90%E7%89%88%EF%BC%89&rft.au=Stanley%20Irobekhian%20Reuben%20Okoduwa%20Ismaila%20A%20Umar%20Dorcas%20B%20James%20Hajara%20M%20Inuwa%20James%20D%20Habila&rft.date=2016&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=605&rft.epage=614&rft.pages=605-614&rft.issn=1948-9358&rft.eissn=1948-9358&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cchongqing%3E87746869504849545048484851%3C/chongqing%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-chongqing_primary_877468695048495450484848513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cqvip_id=87746869504849545048484851&rfr_iscdi=true