Putting the Peter Parker Principle into Practice

Vertical coordination is a significant problem in many if not most countries. These problems are exacerbated in policy implementation related to issues that cut across jurisdictional borders. This paper compares policy implementation in the field of climate change, a quintessential example of such c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Review of Public Policy 2020-09, Vol.2, p.192-208
Main Authors: Nagel, Maximilian Lennart, Pierre, Jon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
climate policy
multi-level governance
vertical policy coordination
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 208
container_issue
container_start_page 192
container_title International Review of Public Policy
container_volume 2
creator Nagel, Maximilian Lennart
Pierre, Jon
description Vertical coordination is a significant problem in many if not most countries. These problems are exacerbated in policy implementation related to issues that cut across jurisdictional borders. This paper compares policy implementation in the field of climate change, a quintessential example of such cross-cutting issues. In the context of CO2 emissions reduction policies, the Peter Parker principle states that vertical coordination presupposes not just central government control but also its responsibility. Our contribution to that argument is that the divorce between regulatory authority and formal jurisdiction challenges the principle. The present paper studies how these issues play out in two different types of institutional contexts; those of Germany and Sweden.
doi_str_mv 10.4000/irpp.1123
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>doaj_cleo_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cleo_primary_oai_revues_org_irpp_1123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_5be67352264a42af9a49afcdb7bfb398</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>oai_doaj_org_article_5be67352264a42af9a49afcdb7bfb398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1383-778bf55f4547f1702765605e31d5e1fbc31c7f70d6d67951e88ddc13c142dedd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkMtKA0EQRRtRMMQs_IP5ACf2u3qWEnwEAmah66Ef1bE1ZoaeieDf23lsXN2qS9Xhcgm5ZXQuKaX3Kff9nDEuLsiEA9W15iAvy6yhqYUBcU1mw5AclRIkM0JNCF3vxzHtNtX4gdUaR8zV2uavg-S086nfYpV2Y1dW68fk8YZcRbsdcHbWKXl_enxbvNSr1-fl4mFVeyaMqAGMi0pFqSREBpSDVpoqFCwoZNF5wTxEoEGHEk4xNCaE8uqZ5AFDEFOyPHFDZz_bPqdvm3_bzqb2aHR509pcAm2xVQ41CMW5llZyGxsrGxt9cOCiE40prLsTq1x3_1gZf_Y4HGmH8tpDeeIPPXFiqQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Putting the Peter Parker Principle into Practice</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）</source><creator>Nagel, Maximilian Lennart ; Pierre, Jon</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Maximilian Lennart ; Pierre, Jon</creatorcontrib><description>Vertical coordination is a significant problem in many if not most countries. These problems are exacerbated in policy implementation related to issues that cut across jurisdictional borders. This paper compares policy implementation in the field of climate change, a quintessential example of such cross-cutting issues. In the context of CO2 emissions reduction policies, the Peter Parker principle states that vertical coordination presupposes not just central government control but also its responsibility. Our contribution to that argument is that the divorce between regulatory authority and formal jurisdiction challenges the principle. The present paper studies how these issues play out in two different types of institutional contexts; those of Germany and Sweden.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2679-3873</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2706-6274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4000/irpp.1123</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Public Policy Association</publisher><subject>climate policy ; multi-level governance ; vertical policy coordination</subject><ispartof>International Review of Public Policy, 2020-09, Vol.2, p.192-208</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Maximilian Lennart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Jon</creatorcontrib><title>Putting the Peter Parker Principle into Practice</title><title>International Review of Public Policy</title><description>Vertical coordination is a significant problem in many if not most countries. These problems are exacerbated in policy implementation related to issues that cut across jurisdictional borders. This paper compares policy implementation in the field of climate change, a quintessential example of such cross-cutting issues. In the context of CO2 emissions reduction policies, the Peter Parker principle states that vertical coordination presupposes not just central government control but also its responsibility. Our contribution to that argument is that the divorce between regulatory authority and formal jurisdiction challenges the principle. The present paper studies how these issues play out in two different types of institutional contexts; those of Germany and Sweden.</description><subject>climate policy</subject><subject>multi-level governance</subject><subject>vertical policy coordination</subject><issn>2679-3873</issn><issn>2706-6274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkMtKA0EQRRtRMMQs_IP5ACf2u3qWEnwEAmah66Ef1bE1ZoaeieDf23lsXN2qS9Xhcgm5ZXQuKaX3Kff9nDEuLsiEA9W15iAvy6yhqYUBcU1mw5AclRIkM0JNCF3vxzHtNtX4gdUaR8zV2uavg-S086nfYpV2Y1dW68fk8YZcRbsdcHbWKXl_enxbvNSr1-fl4mFVeyaMqAGMi0pFqSREBpSDVpoqFCwoZNF5wTxEoEGHEk4xNCaE8uqZ5AFDEFOyPHFDZz_bPqdvm3_bzqb2aHR509pcAm2xVQ41CMW5llZyGxsrGxt9cOCiE40prLsTq1x3_1gZf_Y4HGmH8tpDeeIPPXFiqQ</recordid><startdate>20200909</startdate><enddate>20200909</enddate><creator>Nagel, Maximilian Lennart</creator><creator>Pierre, Jon</creator><general>International Public Policy Association</general><general>OpenEdition</general><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200909</creationdate><title>Putting the Peter Parker Principle into Practice</title><author>Nagel, Maximilian Lennart ; Pierre, Jon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1383-778bf55f4547f1702765605e31d5e1fbc31c7f70d6d67951e88ddc13c142dedd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>climate policy</topic><topic>multi-level governance</topic><topic>vertical policy coordination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Maximilian Lennart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierre, Jon</creatorcontrib><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>International Review of Public Policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagel, Maximilian Lennart</au><au>Pierre, Jon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Putting the Peter Parker Principle into Practice</atitle><jtitle>International Review of Public Policy</jtitle><date>2020-09-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>192</spage><epage>208</epage><pages>192-208</pages><issn>2679-3873</issn><eissn>2706-6274</eissn><abstract>Vertical coordination is a significant problem in many if not most countries. These problems are exacerbated in policy implementation related to issues that cut across jurisdictional borders. This paper compares policy implementation in the field of climate change, a quintessential example of such cross-cutting issues. In the context of CO2 emissions reduction policies, the Peter Parker principle states that vertical coordination presupposes not just central government control but also its responsibility. Our contribution to that argument is that the divorce between regulatory authority and formal jurisdiction challenges the principle. The present paper studies how these issues play out in two different types of institutional contexts; those of Germany and Sweden.</abstract><pub>International Public Policy Association</pub><doi>10.4000/irpp.1123</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2679-3873
ispartof International Review of Public Policy, 2020-09, Vol.2, p.192-208
issn 2679-3873
2706-6274
language eng
recordid cdi_cleo_primary_oai_revues_org_irpp_1123
source Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）
subjects climate policy
multi-level governance
vertical policy coordination
title Putting the Peter Parker Principle into Practice
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A13%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-doaj_cleo_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Putting%20the%20Peter%20Parker%20Principle%20into%20Practice&rft.jtitle=International%20Review%20of%20Public%20Policy&rft.au=Nagel,%20Maximilian%20Lennart&rft.date=2020-09-09&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=208&rft.pages=192-208&rft.issn=2679-3873&rft.eissn=2706-6274&rft_id=info:doi/10.4000/irpp.1123&rft_dat=%3Cdoaj_cleo_%3Eoai_doaj_org_article_5be67352264a42af9a49afcdb7bfb398%3C/doaj_cleo_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1383-778bf55f4547f1702765605e31d5e1fbc31c7f70d6d67951e88ddc13c142dedd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true