Loading…

A parable of compliance issues and their link to EBFM outcomes

•Cost of Compliance is proposed as a useful statistic for assessing any proposed change in management in any fishery.•A way to calculated it is shown for the Atlantean roundfish fisheries.•A summary is provided of the response of Atlanterro Stakeholders to this approach.•It suggests how Atlanterro e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fisheries research 2019-03, Vol.211, p.51-58
Main Authors: Pope, John G., Weber, Charlotte T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Cost of Compliance is proposed as a useful statistic for assessing any proposed change in management in any fishery.•A way to calculated it is shown for the Atlantean roundfish fisheries.•A summary is provided of the response of Atlanterro Stakeholders to this approach.•It suggests how Atlanterro expertise could be transfered to other areas.•It addresses the problems of including Atlanterro and other Stakeholders in the fisheries management process. Fisheries Stakeholders are understandably most concerned with immediate problems. Often these problems are related to proposed rule changes. This short term focus is in itself a serious problem for introducing Ecosystems Based Fisheries Management (EBFM), which is typically seen as a long-term approach. However, the short-term response of fishers to rule changes may well have long-term consequences by either changing their fishing patterns or by changing the extent to which fishers obey the rules. Either response could have a long-term impact on achieving EBFM. This is a difficult area to study because it involves fishers’ unrecorded behaviour, but it is probably the case that many of the responses of fishers may be influenced by how much it costs them to change their behaviour to comply with new rules. Changes in behaviour may include changes in fishing gear, fishing grounds or fishing effort. To examine these possibilities requires that a short-term area based model is available that can consider the costs and consequences of changes in fishing gear or fishing ground. There can be technical difficulties with doing this, but this paper attempts to show how these might be overcome. However, given the sensitive nature of compliance issues, these approaches are applied to the mythical fisheries of Atlantis rather than to real life fisheries. Initial results of the model applied to the important Atlantean Fishing fleets are shown, and most importantly how much compliance might cost in these cases is indicated (i.e. the profit forgone by complying). Pursuing this scientific parable further also allows an open discussion of ways to mitigate non compliance. It suggests how stakeholders and managers might be able to improve trust and compliance by adding fishers’ information to the scientific information used in models of compliance. This would increase transparency and help with identifying and encouraging responsible behaviours that improve compliance and thus the chances of EBFM being successful. The purpose of th
ISSN:0165-7836
1872-6763
1872-6763
DOI:10.1016/j.fishres.2018.10.012