Loading…

Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review

Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of technology assessment in health care 2019-01, Vol.35 (2), p.99-105
Main Authors: Stich, Anne Kathrin, Mozygemba, Kati, Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke, Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria, Hofmann, Bjørn, van der Wilt, Gert-Jan, Gerhardus, Ansgar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573
container_end_page 105
container_issue 2
container_start_page 99
container_title International journal of technology assessment in health care
container_volume 35
creator Stich, Anne Kathrin
Mozygemba, Kati
Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke
Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria
Hofmann, Bjørn
van der Wilt, Gert-Jan
Gerhardus, Ansgar
description Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview of methodological approaches to address social and cultural aspects related to health technologies in HTA. We conducted a comprehensive literature search by searching fourteen databases and a hand-search of two pertinent journals. Additionally, we sent a query to all member agencies of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) asking them for methods they use to assess social and cultural aspects. A total of 125 publications met our inclusion criteria. We grouped the methodological approaches into checklists for experts, literature reviews, stakeholder participatory approaches, primary data collection methods, and combinations of methodological approaches. There is a wide variety of methods available for assessing social and cultural aspects of health technologies, some of which have been applied in HTA. The presented overview of the different approaches and their merits can facilitate the assessment of these aspects, and improve the knowledge regarding (potential) success and failure of the implementation of a health technology.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0266462319000102
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_76988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462319000102</cupid><sourcerecordid>2199187484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9PFDEUxRujkQX9AL7oJLz4MtjbP9PWN0IQSNaYCL7adDt3dktmp0s7g-Hb05UFEoxPN7n3d865ySHkA9AjoKC-XFLWNKJhHAylFCh7RWYgFNQNF_o1mW3P9fa-R_Zzvi4Ip4a-JXtlgFFGzMjv7ziuYpur45wx5zAsq8voQ_RTP07J9WW_QT_mKnbVObp-XFVX6FdD7OMyYP5a_cRc0L93V83DiMkVIZb9bcA_78ibzvUZ3-_mAfn17fTq5Lye_zi7ODme114IOtbKSakaJqGjnHWegeSec6Y4CrpQLWijKDRMy1bTTjLuFt4BGC8b0UqQih-QTw--PoU8hsEOMTkLVEtmVWO0LsTnB2KT4s2EebTrkD32vRswTtkyMAa0EloU9PAFeh2nNJT_LWPAofzJZKHgMTLmnLCzmxTWLt2VWLutx_5TT9F83DlPizW2T4rHPgrAd6ZuvUihXeJz9v9t7wFXDZXP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213125125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Stich, Anne Kathrin ; Mozygemba, Kati ; Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke ; Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria ; Hofmann, Bjørn ; van der Wilt, Gert-Jan ; Gerhardus, Ansgar</creator><creatorcontrib>Stich, Anne Kathrin ; Mozygemba, Kati ; Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke ; Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria ; Hofmann, Bjørn ; van der Wilt, Gert-Jan ; Gerhardus, Ansgar</creatorcontrib><description>Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview of methodological approaches to address social and cultural aspects related to health technologies in HTA. We conducted a comprehensive literature search by searching fourteen databases and a hand-search of two pertinent journals. Additionally, we sent a query to all member agencies of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) asking them for methods they use to assess social and cultural aspects. A total of 125 publications met our inclusion criteria. We grouped the methodological approaches into checklists for experts, literature reviews, stakeholder participatory approaches, primary data collection methods, and combinations of methodological approaches. There is a wide variety of methods available for assessing social and cultural aspects of health technologies, some of which have been applied in HTA. The presented overview of the different approaches and their merits can facilitate the assessment of these aspects, and improve the knowledge regarding (potential) success and failure of the implementation of a health technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462319000102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30919794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Caregivers ; Check lists ; Citation indexes ; Cultural Characteristics ; Cultural factors ; Data Collection ; Ethics ; Focus groups ; Health ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Medical screening ; Method ; Palliative care ; Reviews ; Society ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Stakeholder Participation ; Stakeholders ; Studies ; Technology ; Technology assessment ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2019-01, Vol.35 (2), p.99-105</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><rights>2019 This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2213125125/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2213125125?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11688,26567,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,72960,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30919794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stich, Anne Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozygemba, Kati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerhardus, Ansgar</creatorcontrib><title>Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview of methodological approaches to address social and cultural aspects related to health technologies in HTA. We conducted a comprehensive literature search by searching fourteen databases and a hand-search of two pertinent journals. Additionally, we sent a query to all member agencies of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) asking them for methods they use to assess social and cultural aspects. A total of 125 publications met our inclusion criteria. We grouped the methodological approaches into checklists for experts, literature reviews, stakeholder participatory approaches, primary data collection methods, and combinations of methodological approaches. There is a wide variety of methods available for assessing social and cultural aspects of health technologies, some of which have been applied in HTA. The presented overview of the different approaches and their merits can facilitate the assessment of these aspects, and improve the knowledge regarding (potential) success and failure of the implementation of a health technology.</description><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Check lists</subject><subject>Citation indexes</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Method</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9PFDEUxRujkQX9AL7oJLz4MtjbP9PWN0IQSNaYCL7adDt3dktmp0s7g-Hb05UFEoxPN7n3d865ySHkA9AjoKC-XFLWNKJhHAylFCh7RWYgFNQNF_o1mW3P9fa-R_Zzvi4Ip4a-JXtlgFFGzMjv7ziuYpur45wx5zAsq8voQ_RTP07J9WW_QT_mKnbVObp-XFVX6FdD7OMyYP5a_cRc0L93V83DiMkVIZb9bcA_78ibzvUZ3-_mAfn17fTq5Lye_zi7ODme114IOtbKSakaJqGjnHWegeSec6Y4CrpQLWijKDRMy1bTTjLuFt4BGC8b0UqQih-QTw--PoU8hsEOMTkLVEtmVWO0LsTnB2KT4s2EebTrkD32vRswTtkyMAa0EloU9PAFeh2nNJT_LWPAofzJZKHgMTLmnLCzmxTWLt2VWLutx_5TT9F83DlPizW2T4rHPgrAd6ZuvUihXeJz9v9t7wFXDZXP</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Stich, Anne Kathrin</creator><creator>Mozygemba, Kati</creator><creator>Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke</creator><creator>Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria</creator><creator>Hofmann, Bjørn</creator><creator>van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</creator><creator>Gerhardus, Ansgar</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review</title><author>Stich, Anne Kathrin ; Mozygemba, Kati ; Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke ; Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria ; Hofmann, Bjørn ; van der Wilt, Gert-Jan ; Gerhardus, Ansgar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Check lists</topic><topic>Citation indexes</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Method</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stich, Anne Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozygemba, Kati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerhardus, Ansgar</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals website</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stich, Anne Kathrin</au><au>Mozygemba, Kati</au><au>Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke</au><au>Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria</au><au>Hofmann, Bjørn</au><au>van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</au><au>Gerhardus, Ansgar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>99-105</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview of methodological approaches to address social and cultural aspects related to health technologies in HTA. We conducted a comprehensive literature search by searching fourteen databases and a hand-search of two pertinent journals. Additionally, we sent a query to all member agencies of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) asking them for methods they use to assess social and cultural aspects. A total of 125 publications met our inclusion criteria. We grouped the methodological approaches into checklists for experts, literature reviews, stakeholder participatory approaches, primary data collection methods, and combinations of methodological approaches. There is a wide variety of methods available for assessing social and cultural aspects of health technologies, some of which have been applied in HTA. The presented overview of the different approaches and their merits can facilitate the assessment of these aspects, and improve the knowledge regarding (potential) success and failure of the implementation of a health technology.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30919794</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462319000102</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0266-4623
ispartof International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2019-01, Vol.35 (2), p.99-105
issn 0266-4623
1471-6348
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_10852_76988
source Cambridge Journals Online; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; ABI/INFORM Global
subjects Caregivers
Check lists
Citation indexes
Cultural Characteristics
Cultural factors
Data Collection
Ethics
Focus groups
Health
Health technology assessment
Humans
Literature reviews
Medical screening
Method
Palliative care
Reviews
Society
Socioeconomic Factors
Stakeholder Participation
Stakeholders
Studies
Technology
Technology assessment
Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods
title Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A21%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20Assessing%20Sociocultural%20Aspects%20of%20Health%20Technologies:%20Results%20of%20a%20Literature%20Review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Stich,%20Anne%20Kathrin&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=99-105&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462319000102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_crist%3E2199187484%3C/proquest_crist%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213125125&rft_id=info:pmid/30919794&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462319000102&rfr_iscdi=true