Loading…
Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review
Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of technology assessment in health care 2019-01, Vol.35 (2), p.99-105 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573 |
container_end_page | 105 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | International journal of technology assessment in health care |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Stich, Anne Kathrin Mozygemba, Kati Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria Hofmann, Bjørn van der Wilt, Gert-Jan Gerhardus, Ansgar |
description | Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview of methodological approaches to address social and cultural aspects related to health technologies in HTA.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search by searching fourteen databases and a hand-search of two pertinent journals. Additionally, we sent a query to all member agencies of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) asking them for methods they use to assess social and cultural aspects.
A total of 125 publications met our inclusion criteria. We grouped the methodological approaches into checklists for experts, literature reviews, stakeholder participatory approaches, primary data collection methods, and combinations of methodological approaches.
There is a wide variety of methods available for assessing social and cultural aspects of health technologies, some of which have been applied in HTA. The presented overview of the different approaches and their merits can facilitate the assessment of these aspects, and improve the knowledge regarding (potential) success and failure of the implementation of a health technology. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0266462319000102 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_crist</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_10852_76988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0266462319000102</cupid><sourcerecordid>2199187484</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV9PFDEUxRujkQX9AL7oJLz4MtjbP9PWN0IQSNaYCL7adDt3dktmp0s7g-Hb05UFEoxPN7n3d865ySHkA9AjoKC-XFLWNKJhHAylFCh7RWYgFNQNF_o1mW3P9fa-R_Zzvi4Ip4a-JXtlgFFGzMjv7ziuYpur45wx5zAsq8voQ_RTP07J9WW_QT_mKnbVObp-XFVX6FdD7OMyYP5a_cRc0L93V83DiMkVIZb9bcA_78ibzvUZ3-_mAfn17fTq5Lye_zi7ODme114IOtbKSakaJqGjnHWegeSec6Y4CrpQLWijKDRMy1bTTjLuFt4BGC8b0UqQih-QTw--PoU8hsEOMTkLVEtmVWO0LsTnB2KT4s2EebTrkD32vRswTtkyMAa0EloU9PAFeh2nNJT_LWPAofzJZKHgMTLmnLCzmxTWLt2VWLutx_5TT9F83DlPizW2T4rHPgrAd6ZuvUihXeJz9v9t7wFXDZXP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213125125</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><creator>Stich, Anne Kathrin ; Mozygemba, Kati ; Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke ; Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria ; Hofmann, Bjørn ; van der Wilt, Gert-Jan ; Gerhardus, Ansgar</creator><creatorcontrib>Stich, Anne Kathrin ; Mozygemba, Kati ; Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke ; Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria ; Hofmann, Bjørn ; van der Wilt, Gert-Jan ; Gerhardus, Ansgar</creatorcontrib><description>Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview of methodological approaches to address social and cultural aspects related to health technologies in HTA.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search by searching fourteen databases and a hand-search of two pertinent journals. Additionally, we sent a query to all member agencies of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) asking them for methods they use to assess social and cultural aspects.
A total of 125 publications met our inclusion criteria. We grouped the methodological approaches into checklists for experts, literature reviews, stakeholder participatory approaches, primary data collection methods, and combinations of methodological approaches.
There is a wide variety of methods available for assessing social and cultural aspects of health technologies, some of which have been applied in HTA. The presented overview of the different approaches and their merits can facilitate the assessment of these aspects, and improve the knowledge regarding (potential) success and failure of the implementation of a health technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-4623</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0266462319000102</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30919794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Caregivers ; Check lists ; Citation indexes ; Cultural Characteristics ; Cultural factors ; Data Collection ; Ethics ; Focus groups ; Health ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Literature reviews ; Medical screening ; Method ; Palliative care ; Reviews ; Society ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Stakeholder Participation ; Stakeholders ; Studies ; Technology ; Technology assessment ; Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</subject><ispartof>International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2019-01, Vol.35 (2), p.99-105</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><rights>2019 This article is published under (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2213125125/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2213125125?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,11688,26567,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,72960,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30919794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stich, Anne Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozygemba, Kati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerhardus, Ansgar</creatorcontrib><title>Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review</title><title>International journal of technology assessment in health care</title><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><description>Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview of methodological approaches to address social and cultural aspects related to health technologies in HTA.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search by searching fourteen databases and a hand-search of two pertinent journals. Additionally, we sent a query to all member agencies of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) asking them for methods they use to assess social and cultural aspects.
A total of 125 publications met our inclusion criteria. We grouped the methodological approaches into checklists for experts, literature reviews, stakeholder participatory approaches, primary data collection methods, and combinations of methodological approaches.
There is a wide variety of methods available for assessing social and cultural aspects of health technologies, some of which have been applied in HTA. The presented overview of the different approaches and their merits can facilitate the assessment of these aspects, and improve the knowledge regarding (potential) success and failure of the implementation of a health technology.</description><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Check lists</subject><subject>Citation indexes</subject><subject>Cultural Characteristics</subject><subject>Cultural factors</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health technology assessment</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Method</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Stakeholder Participation</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><subject>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</subject><issn>0266-4623</issn><issn>1471-6348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV9PFDEUxRujkQX9AL7oJLz4MtjbP9PWN0IQSNaYCL7adDt3dktmp0s7g-Hb05UFEoxPN7n3d865ySHkA9AjoKC-XFLWNKJhHAylFCh7RWYgFNQNF_o1mW3P9fa-R_Zzvi4Ip4a-JXtlgFFGzMjv7ziuYpur45wx5zAsq8voQ_RTP07J9WW_QT_mKnbVObp-XFVX6FdD7OMyYP5a_cRc0L93V83DiMkVIZb9bcA_78ibzvUZ3-_mAfn17fTq5Lye_zi7ODme114IOtbKSakaJqGjnHWegeSec6Y4CrpQLWijKDRMy1bTTjLuFt4BGC8b0UqQih-QTw--PoU8hsEOMTkLVEtmVWO0LsTnB2KT4s2EebTrkD32vRswTtkyMAa0EloU9PAFeh2nNJT_LWPAofzJZKHgMTLmnLCzmxTWLt2VWLutx_5TT9F83DlPizW2T4rHPgrAd6ZuvUihXeJz9v9t7wFXDZXP</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Stich, Anne Kathrin</creator><creator>Mozygemba, Kati</creator><creator>Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke</creator><creator>Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria</creator><creator>Hofmann, Bjørn</creator><creator>van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</creator><creator>Gerhardus, Ansgar</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review</title><author>Stich, Anne Kathrin ; Mozygemba, Kati ; Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke ; Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria ; Hofmann, Bjørn ; van der Wilt, Gert-Jan ; Gerhardus, Ansgar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Check lists</topic><topic>Citation indexes</topic><topic>Cultural Characteristics</topic><topic>Cultural factors</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health technology assessment</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Method</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Stakeholder Participation</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><topic>Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stich, Anne Kathrin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mozygemba, Kati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmann, Bjørn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerhardus, Ansgar</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals website</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health Management Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stich, Anne Kathrin</au><au>Mozygemba, Kati</au><au>Lysdahl, Kristin Bakke</au><au>Pfadenhauer, Lisa Maria</au><au>Hofmann, Bjørn</au><au>van der Wilt, Gert-Jan</au><au>Gerhardus, Ansgar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technology assessment in health care</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Technol Assess Health Care</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>105</epage><pages>99-105</pages><issn>0266-4623</issn><eissn>1471-6348</eissn><abstract>Social and cultural aspects are rarely assessed in health technology assessments (HTA), despite being part of most HTA definitions. One hypothesis for the reason why they are hardly considered in HTA is that we lack relevant assessment methods. Accordingly, this review aims at providing an overview of methodological approaches to address social and cultural aspects related to health technologies in HTA.
We conducted a comprehensive literature search by searching fourteen databases and a hand-search of two pertinent journals. Additionally, we sent a query to all member agencies of the International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) asking them for methods they use to assess social and cultural aspects.
A total of 125 publications met our inclusion criteria. We grouped the methodological approaches into checklists for experts, literature reviews, stakeholder participatory approaches, primary data collection methods, and combinations of methodological approaches.
There is a wide variety of methods available for assessing social and cultural aspects of health technologies, some of which have been applied in HTA. The presented overview of the different approaches and their merits can facilitate the assessment of these aspects, and improve the knowledge regarding (potential) success and failure of the implementation of a health technology.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>30919794</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0266462319000102</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-4623 |
ispartof | International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2019-01, Vol.35 (2), p.99-105 |
issn | 0266-4623 1471-6348 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_10852_76988 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online; NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives; ABI/INFORM Global |
subjects | Caregivers Check lists Citation indexes Cultural Characteristics Cultural factors Data Collection Ethics Focus groups Health Health technology assessment Humans Literature reviews Medical screening Method Palliative care Reviews Society Socioeconomic Factors Stakeholder Participation Stakeholders Studies Technology Technology assessment Technology Assessment, Biomedical - methods |
title | Methods Assessing Sociocultural Aspects of Health Technologies: Results of a Literature Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T21%3A21%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_crist&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20Assessing%20Sociocultural%20Aspects%20of%20Health%20Technologies:%20Results%20of%20a%20Literature%20Review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technology%20assessment%20in%20health%20care&rft.au=Stich,%20Anne%20Kathrin&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=105&rft.pages=99-105&rft.issn=0266-4623&rft.eissn=1471-6348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0266462319000102&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_crist%3E2199187484%3C/proquest_crist%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-7a5576251f032fc2153c33273e40b7d1897016285d80f523abca119c564d51573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213125125&rft_id=info:pmid/30919794&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0266462319000102&rfr_iscdi=true |