Loading…

Trump Tweets’ impact on financial returns

In this study, we investigate whether U.S. President, Donald Trump’s Twitter sentiment and activity affect financial markets. By employing the event study methodology, we provide strong empirical evidence that our small-cap portfolios and selected sample firms have been affected by Trump’s Twitter s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Myklebust, Karoline, Aam, Arill André
Format: Dissertation
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Myklebust, Karoline
Aam, Arill André
description In this study, we investigate whether U.S. President, Donald Trump’s Twitter sentiment and activity affect financial markets. By employing the event study methodology, we provide strong empirical evidence that our small-cap portfolios and selected sample firms have been affected by Trump’s Twitter sentiment. Overall, we find that positive sentiment tweets generate positive abnormal returns, whereas negative sentiment tweets generate negative abnormal returns. The effect persists multiple days after the announcement date for several of the sample firms, which is considered a violation of the semi-strong form of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH). The portfolios are consistent with the EMH for positive tweets, as the effect is rapidly incorporated (within one day). For negative tweets, the EMH is violated, as the cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) continue to drift after the event. This indicates that the market finds it more challenging to value negative Trump sentiment than positive Trump sentiment. Moreover, we find that Trump’s Twitter sentiment affects stocks across all sizes and multiple industries in our sample. Further, our secondary study provides empirical evidence that Trump’s tweet frequency also affects the sample portfolios. This effect persists over multiple days and accordingly violates the EMH. Lastly, we present complementary findings regarding volume traded, market volatility, and the variability in the effect of Trump’s tweets over time.
format dissertation
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2686699</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2686699</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_26866993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZNAOKSrNLVAIKU9NLSl-1DBTITO3IDG5RCE_TyEtMy8xLzkzMUehKLWktCivmIeBNS0xpziVF0pzMyi6uYY4e-gmF2UWl2TmxeflFyXGGxoamRrEG5lZmJlZWhoTowYAxYIqHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>dissertation</recordtype></control><display><type>dissertation</type><title>Trump Tweets’ impact on financial returns</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Myklebust, Karoline ; Aam, Arill André</creator><creatorcontrib>Myklebust, Karoline ; Aam, Arill André</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we investigate whether U.S. President, Donald Trump’s Twitter sentiment and activity affect financial markets. By employing the event study methodology, we provide strong empirical evidence that our small-cap portfolios and selected sample firms have been affected by Trump’s Twitter sentiment. Overall, we find that positive sentiment tweets generate positive abnormal returns, whereas negative sentiment tweets generate negative abnormal returns. The effect persists multiple days after the announcement date for several of the sample firms, which is considered a violation of the semi-strong form of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH). The portfolios are consistent with the EMH for positive tweets, as the effect is rapidly incorporated (within one day). For negative tweets, the EMH is violated, as the cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) continue to drift after the event. This indicates that the market finds it more challenging to value negative Trump sentiment than positive Trump sentiment. Moreover, we find that Trump’s Twitter sentiment affects stocks across all sizes and multiple industries in our sample. Further, our secondary study provides empirical evidence that Trump’s tweet frequency also affects the sample portfolios. This effect persists over multiple days and accordingly violates the EMH. Lastly, we present complementary findings regarding volume traded, market volatility, and the variability in the effect of Trump’s tweets over time.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Handelshøyskolen BI</publisher><subject>accounting ; business</subject><creationdate>2020</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,311,780,885,4052,26567</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2686699$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Myklebust, Karoline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aam, Arill André</creatorcontrib><title>Trump Tweets’ impact on financial returns</title><description>In this study, we investigate whether U.S. President, Donald Trump’s Twitter sentiment and activity affect financial markets. By employing the event study methodology, we provide strong empirical evidence that our small-cap portfolios and selected sample firms have been affected by Trump’s Twitter sentiment. Overall, we find that positive sentiment tweets generate positive abnormal returns, whereas negative sentiment tweets generate negative abnormal returns. The effect persists multiple days after the announcement date for several of the sample firms, which is considered a violation of the semi-strong form of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH). The portfolios are consistent with the EMH for positive tweets, as the effect is rapidly incorporated (within one day). For negative tweets, the EMH is violated, as the cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) continue to drift after the event. This indicates that the market finds it more challenging to value negative Trump sentiment than positive Trump sentiment. Moreover, we find that Trump’s Twitter sentiment affects stocks across all sizes and multiple industries in our sample. Further, our secondary study provides empirical evidence that Trump’s tweet frequency also affects the sample portfolios. This effect persists over multiple days and accordingly violates the EMH. Lastly, we present complementary findings regarding volume traded, market volatility, and the variability in the effect of Trump’s tweets over time.</description><subject>accounting</subject><subject>business</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>dissertation</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>dissertation</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZNAOKSrNLVAIKU9NLSl-1DBTITO3IDG5RCE_TyEtMy8xLzkzMUehKLWktCivmIeBNS0xpziVF0pzMyi6uYY4e-gmF2UWl2TmxeflFyXGGxoamRrEG5lZmJlZWhoTowYAxYIqHA</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Myklebust, Karoline</creator><creator>Aam, Arill André</creator><general>Handelshøyskolen BI</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Trump Tweets’ impact on financial returns</title><author>Myklebust, Karoline ; Aam, Arill André</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_26866993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>dissertations</rsrctype><prefilter>dissertations</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>accounting</topic><topic>business</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Myklebust, Karoline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aam, Arill André</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Myklebust, Karoline</au><au>Aam, Arill André</au><format>dissertation</format><genre>dissertation</genre><ristype>THES</ristype><btitle>Trump Tweets’ impact on financial returns</btitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><abstract>In this study, we investigate whether U.S. President, Donald Trump’s Twitter sentiment and activity affect financial markets. By employing the event study methodology, we provide strong empirical evidence that our small-cap portfolios and selected sample firms have been affected by Trump’s Twitter sentiment. Overall, we find that positive sentiment tweets generate positive abnormal returns, whereas negative sentiment tweets generate negative abnormal returns. The effect persists multiple days after the announcement date for several of the sample firms, which is considered a violation of the semi-strong form of the efficient market hypothesis (EMH). The portfolios are consistent with the EMH for positive tweets, as the effect is rapidly incorporated (within one day). For negative tweets, the EMH is violated, as the cumulative average abnormal returns (CAAR) continue to drift after the event. This indicates that the market finds it more challenging to value negative Trump sentiment than positive Trump sentiment. Moreover, we find that Trump’s Twitter sentiment affects stocks across all sizes and multiple industries in our sample. Further, our secondary study provides empirical evidence that Trump’s tweet frequency also affects the sample portfolios. This effect persists over multiple days and accordingly violates the EMH. Lastly, we present complementary findings regarding volume traded, market volatility, and the variability in the effect of Trump’s tweets over time.</abstract><pub>Handelshøyskolen BI</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2686699
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
subjects accounting
business
title Trump Tweets’ impact on financial returns
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T05%3A09%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.genre=dissertation&rft.btitle=Trump%20Tweets%E2%80%99%20impact%20on%20financial%20returns&rft.au=Myklebust,%20Karoline&rft.date=2020&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2686699%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_26866993%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true