Loading…

The Anthropocene: comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines

The term Anthropocene initially emerged from the Earth System science (ESS) community in the early 2000s, denoting a concept that the Holocene Epoch has terminated as a consequence of human activities. First associated with the onset of the Industrial Revolution, it was then more closely linked with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zalasiewicz, Jan, Waters, Colin N, Ellis, Erle C, Head, Martin J, Vidas, Davor, Steffen, Will, Thomas, Julia Adeney, Horn, Eva, Summerhayes, Colin, Leinfelder, Reinhold, McNeill, John R, Galuszka, Agnieszka, Williams, Mark, Barnosky, Anthony, Richter, Daniel DeB, Gibbard, Philip L, Syvitski, Jaia, Jeandel, Catherine, Cearreta, Alejandro, Cundy, Andrew B, Fairchild, Ian J, Rose, Neil L, Ivar do Sul, Juliana A, Shotyk, William, Turner, Simon, Wagreich, Michael, Zinke, Jens
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Zalasiewicz, Jan
Waters, Colin N
Ellis, Erle C
Head, Martin J
Vidas, Davor
Steffen, Will
Thomas, Julia Adeney
Horn, Eva
Summerhayes, Colin
Leinfelder, Reinhold
McNeill, John R
Galuszka, Agnieszka
Williams, Mark
Barnosky, Anthony
Richter, Daniel DeB
Gibbard, Philip L
Syvitski, Jaia
Jeandel, Catherine
Cearreta, Alejandro
Cundy, Andrew B
Fairchild, Ian J
Rose, Neil L
Ivar do Sul, Juliana A
Shotyk, William
Turner, Simon
Wagreich, Michael
Zinke, Jens
description The term Anthropocene initially emerged from the Earth System science (ESS) community in the early 2000s, denoting a concept that the Holocene Epoch has terminated as a consequence of human activities. First associated with the onset of the Industrial Revolution, it was then more closely linked with the Great Acceleration in industrialization and globalization from the 1950s that fundamentally modified physical, chemical and biological signals in geological archives. Since 2009, the Anthropocene has been evaluated by the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG), tasked with examining it for potential inclusion in the Geological Time Scale. Such inclusion requires a precisely defined chronostratigraphic and geochronological unit with a globally synchronous base and inception, with the mid‐20th century being geologically optimal. This reflects an Earth System state in which human activities have become predominant drivers of modifications to the stratigraphic record, making it clearly distinct from the Holocene. However, more recently, the term Anthropocene has also become used for different conceptual interpretations in diverse scholarly fields, including the environmental and social sciences and humanities. These are often flexibly interpreted, commonly without reference to the geological record, and diachronous in time; they often extend much further back in time than the mid‐20th century. These broader conceptualizations encompass wide ranges and levels of human impacts and interactions with the environment. Here, we clarify what the Anthropocene is in geological terms and compare the proposed geological (chronostratigraphic) definition with some of these broader interpretations and applications of the term ‘Anthropocene’, showing both their overlaps and differences.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2765344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2765344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_27653443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjD0KAjEQRrexEPUOY6eF4P4p2IkoHmD7ZYhjEsjOhCQiW3l1g-wBrL6veO_Ni09nCM6cTBAviphOoGTwGCxrsCnCQMi_z6BJnOgRNirTLDEFTFYH9Gbcwtsmk1VW5NMLHaD3QVAZipBjcUpIMhTgYaOy3lmmuCxmT3SRVtMuivXt2l3uO5WlZLlnCdiXZdXu--p4aOumqf9hvjuISVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Anthropocene: comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Zalasiewicz, Jan ; Waters, Colin N ; Ellis, Erle C ; Head, Martin J ; Vidas, Davor ; Steffen, Will ; Thomas, Julia Adeney ; Horn, Eva ; Summerhayes, Colin ; Leinfelder, Reinhold ; McNeill, John R ; Galuszka, Agnieszka ; Williams, Mark ; Barnosky, Anthony ; Richter, Daniel DeB ; Gibbard, Philip L ; Syvitski, Jaia ; Jeandel, Catherine ; Cearreta, Alejandro ; Cundy, Andrew B ; Fairchild, Ian J ; Rose, Neil L ; Ivar do Sul, Juliana A ; Shotyk, William ; Turner, Simon ; Wagreich, Michael ; Zinke, Jens</creator><creatorcontrib>Zalasiewicz, Jan ; Waters, Colin N ; Ellis, Erle C ; Head, Martin J ; Vidas, Davor ; Steffen, Will ; Thomas, Julia Adeney ; Horn, Eva ; Summerhayes, Colin ; Leinfelder, Reinhold ; McNeill, John R ; Galuszka, Agnieszka ; Williams, Mark ; Barnosky, Anthony ; Richter, Daniel DeB ; Gibbard, Philip L ; Syvitski, Jaia ; Jeandel, Catherine ; Cearreta, Alejandro ; Cundy, Andrew B ; Fairchild, Ian J ; Rose, Neil L ; Ivar do Sul, Juliana A ; Shotyk, William ; Turner, Simon ; Wagreich, Michael ; Zinke, Jens</creatorcontrib><description>The term Anthropocene initially emerged from the Earth System science (ESS) community in the early 2000s, denoting a concept that the Holocene Epoch has terminated as a consequence of human activities. First associated with the onset of the Industrial Revolution, it was then more closely linked with the Great Acceleration in industrialization and globalization from the 1950s that fundamentally modified physical, chemical and biological signals in geological archives. Since 2009, the Anthropocene has been evaluated by the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG), tasked with examining it for potential inclusion in the Geological Time Scale. Such inclusion requires a precisely defined chronostratigraphic and geochronological unit with a globally synchronous base and inception, with the mid‐20th century being geologically optimal. This reflects an Earth System state in which human activities have become predominant drivers of modifications to the stratigraphic record, making it clearly distinct from the Holocene. However, more recently, the term Anthropocene has also become used for different conceptual interpretations in diverse scholarly fields, including the environmental and social sciences and humanities. These are often flexibly interpreted, commonly without reference to the geological record, and diachronous in time; they often extend much further back in time than the mid‐20th century. These broader conceptualizations encompass wide ranges and levels of human impacts and interactions with the environment. Here, we clarify what the Anthropocene is in geological terms and compare the proposed geological (chronostratigraphic) definition with some of these broader interpretations and applications of the term ‘Anthropocene’, showing both their overlaps and differences.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Anthropocene ; Begrepshistorie ; Conceptual history ; Geologi ; Geology ; Interdisciplinary interplay ; Interdiscplinært samspill ; Samfunnsvitenskap ; Social sciences</subject><creationdate>2021</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,26544</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2765344$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zalasiewicz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waters, Colin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Erle C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Head, Martin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidas, Davor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffen, Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Julia Adeney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summerhayes, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinfelder, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeill, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galuszka, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnosky, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Daniel DeB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbard, Philip L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvitski, Jaia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeandel, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cearreta, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cundy, Andrew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairchild, Ian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Neil L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivar do Sul, Juliana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shotyk, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagreich, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinke, Jens</creatorcontrib><title>The Anthropocene: comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines</title><description>The term Anthropocene initially emerged from the Earth System science (ESS) community in the early 2000s, denoting a concept that the Holocene Epoch has terminated as a consequence of human activities. First associated with the onset of the Industrial Revolution, it was then more closely linked with the Great Acceleration in industrialization and globalization from the 1950s that fundamentally modified physical, chemical and biological signals in geological archives. Since 2009, the Anthropocene has been evaluated by the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG), tasked with examining it for potential inclusion in the Geological Time Scale. Such inclusion requires a precisely defined chronostratigraphic and geochronological unit with a globally synchronous base and inception, with the mid‐20th century being geologically optimal. This reflects an Earth System state in which human activities have become predominant drivers of modifications to the stratigraphic record, making it clearly distinct from the Holocene. However, more recently, the term Anthropocene has also become used for different conceptual interpretations in diverse scholarly fields, including the environmental and social sciences and humanities. These are often flexibly interpreted, commonly without reference to the geological record, and diachronous in time; they often extend much further back in time than the mid‐20th century. These broader conceptualizations encompass wide ranges and levels of human impacts and interactions with the environment. Here, we clarify what the Anthropocene is in geological terms and compare the proposed geological (chronostratigraphic) definition with some of these broader interpretations and applications of the term ‘Anthropocene’, showing both their overlaps and differences.</description><subject>Anthropocene</subject><subject>Begrepshistorie</subject><subject>Conceptual history</subject><subject>Geologi</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary interplay</subject><subject>Interdiscplinært samspill</subject><subject>Samfunnsvitenskap</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjD0KAjEQRrexEPUOY6eF4P4p2IkoHmD7ZYhjEsjOhCQiW3l1g-wBrL6veO_Ni09nCM6cTBAviphOoGTwGCxrsCnCQMi_z6BJnOgRNirTLDEFTFYH9Gbcwtsmk1VW5NMLHaD3QVAZipBjcUpIMhTgYaOy3lmmuCxmT3SRVtMuivXt2l3uO5WlZLlnCdiXZdXu--p4aOumqf9hvjuISVY</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Zalasiewicz, Jan</creator><creator>Waters, Colin N</creator><creator>Ellis, Erle C</creator><creator>Head, Martin J</creator><creator>Vidas, Davor</creator><creator>Steffen, Will</creator><creator>Thomas, Julia Adeney</creator><creator>Horn, Eva</creator><creator>Summerhayes, Colin</creator><creator>Leinfelder, Reinhold</creator><creator>McNeill, John R</creator><creator>Galuszka, Agnieszka</creator><creator>Williams, Mark</creator><creator>Barnosky, Anthony</creator><creator>Richter, Daniel DeB</creator><creator>Gibbard, Philip L</creator><creator>Syvitski, Jaia</creator><creator>Jeandel, Catherine</creator><creator>Cearreta, Alejandro</creator><creator>Cundy, Andrew B</creator><creator>Fairchild, Ian J</creator><creator>Rose, Neil L</creator><creator>Ivar do Sul, Juliana A</creator><creator>Shotyk, William</creator><creator>Turner, Simon</creator><creator>Wagreich, Michael</creator><creator>Zinke, Jens</creator><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>The Anthropocene: comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines</title><author>Zalasiewicz, Jan ; Waters, Colin N ; Ellis, Erle C ; Head, Martin J ; Vidas, Davor ; Steffen, Will ; Thomas, Julia Adeney ; Horn, Eva ; Summerhayes, Colin ; Leinfelder, Reinhold ; McNeill, John R ; Galuszka, Agnieszka ; Williams, Mark ; Barnosky, Anthony ; Richter, Daniel DeB ; Gibbard, Philip L ; Syvitski, Jaia ; Jeandel, Catherine ; Cearreta, Alejandro ; Cundy, Andrew B ; Fairchild, Ian J ; Rose, Neil L ; Ivar do Sul, Juliana A ; Shotyk, William ; Turner, Simon ; Wagreich, Michael ; Zinke, Jens</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_27653443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anthropocene</topic><topic>Begrepshistorie</topic><topic>Conceptual history</topic><topic>Geologi</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary interplay</topic><topic>Interdiscplinært samspill</topic><topic>Samfunnsvitenskap</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zalasiewicz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waters, Colin N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellis, Erle C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Head, Martin J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vidas, Davor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffen, Will</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Julia Adeney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horn, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Summerhayes, Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leinfelder, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeill, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galuszka, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnosky, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Daniel DeB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibbard, Philip L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Syvitski, Jaia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jeandel, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cearreta, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cundy, Andrew B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairchild, Ian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, Neil L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivar do Sul, Juliana A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shotyk, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Turner, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagreich, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zinke, Jens</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zalasiewicz, Jan</au><au>Waters, Colin N</au><au>Ellis, Erle C</au><au>Head, Martin J</au><au>Vidas, Davor</au><au>Steffen, Will</au><au>Thomas, Julia Adeney</au><au>Horn, Eva</au><au>Summerhayes, Colin</au><au>Leinfelder, Reinhold</au><au>McNeill, John R</au><au>Galuszka, Agnieszka</au><au>Williams, Mark</au><au>Barnosky, Anthony</au><au>Richter, Daniel DeB</au><au>Gibbard, Philip L</au><au>Syvitski, Jaia</au><au>Jeandel, Catherine</au><au>Cearreta, Alejandro</au><au>Cundy, Andrew B</au><au>Fairchild, Ian J</au><au>Rose, Neil L</au><au>Ivar do Sul, Juliana A</au><au>Shotyk, William</au><au>Turner, Simon</au><au>Wagreich, Michael</au><au>Zinke, Jens</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Anthropocene: comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines</atitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>The term Anthropocene initially emerged from the Earth System science (ESS) community in the early 2000s, denoting a concept that the Holocene Epoch has terminated as a consequence of human activities. First associated with the onset of the Industrial Revolution, it was then more closely linked with the Great Acceleration in industrialization and globalization from the 1950s that fundamentally modified physical, chemical and biological signals in geological archives. Since 2009, the Anthropocene has been evaluated by the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG), tasked with examining it for potential inclusion in the Geological Time Scale. Such inclusion requires a precisely defined chronostratigraphic and geochronological unit with a globally synchronous base and inception, with the mid‐20th century being geologically optimal. This reflects an Earth System state in which human activities have become predominant drivers of modifications to the stratigraphic record, making it clearly distinct from the Holocene. However, more recently, the term Anthropocene has also become used for different conceptual interpretations in diverse scholarly fields, including the environmental and social sciences and humanities. These are often flexibly interpreted, commonly without reference to the geological record, and diachronous in time; they often extend much further back in time than the mid‐20th century. These broader conceptualizations encompass wide ranges and levels of human impacts and interactions with the environment. Here, we clarify what the Anthropocene is in geological terms and compare the proposed geological (chronostratigraphic) definition with some of these broader interpretations and applications of the term ‘Anthropocene’, showing both their overlaps and differences.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2765344
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
subjects Anthropocene
Begrepshistorie
Conceptual history
Geologi
Geology
Interdisciplinary interplay
Interdiscplinært samspill
Samfunnsvitenskap
Social sciences
title The Anthropocene: comparing its meaning in geology (chronostratigraphy) with conceptual approaches arising in other disciplines
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T09%3A43%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Anthropocene:%20comparing%20its%20meaning%20in%20geology%20(chronostratigraphy)%20with%20conceptual%20approaches%20arising%20in%20other%20disciplines&rft.au=Zalasiewicz,%20Jan&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2765344%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_27653443%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true