Loading…

A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses

Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D prin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2021
Main Authors: Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares, Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais, Medola, Fausto Orsi, Baleotti, Luciana Ramos, Sandnes, Frode Eika, Vaezipour, Atiyeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems
container_volume
creator Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares
Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais
Medola, Fausto Orsi
Baleotti, Luciana Ramos
Sandnes, Frode Eika
Vaezipour, Atiyeh
description Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-use evaluation.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2823787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2823787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_28237873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirEKwjAQQLM4iPoP5wcUbIK0a20VN0Ud3EJIL3hQL5AcLf69DuLs9OC9N1f3Bq6vLPh0Qh4uOBJOEAN0FAImZI8ZdigTIkMbeUQWiuwGOCV5xPypjnswXXFOxIL9zy_VLLgh4-rLhVof9rf2WPhEWYgtx-RsWertxupam6quzD_PGzn0OVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares ; Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais ; Medola, Fausto Orsi ; Baleotti, Luciana Ramos ; Sandnes, Frode Eika ; Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares ; Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais ; Medola, Fausto Orsi ; Baleotti, Luciana Ramos ; Sandnes, Frode Eika ; Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creatorcontrib><description>Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-use evaluation.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><subject>3D printing ; Assistive technology ; Orthoses ; Rapid prototyping</subject><ispartof>Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2021</ispartof><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,26544</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2823787$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medola, Fausto Orsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baleotti, Luciana Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandnes, Frode Eika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creatorcontrib><title>A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses</title><title>Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems</title><description>Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-use evaluation.</description><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Assistive technology</subject><subject>Orthoses</subject><subject>Rapid prototyping</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirEKwjAQQLM4iPoP5wcUbIK0a20VN0Ud3EJIL3hQL5AcLf69DuLs9OC9N1f3Bq6vLPh0Qh4uOBJOEAN0FAImZI8ZdigTIkMbeUQWiuwGOCV5xPypjnswXXFOxIL9zy_VLLgh4-rLhVof9rf2WPhEWYgtx-RsWertxupam6quzD_PGzn0OVY</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares</creator><creator>Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais</creator><creator>Medola, Fausto Orsi</creator><creator>Baleotti, Luciana Ramos</creator><creator>Sandnes, Frode Eika</creator><creator>Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses</title><author>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares ; Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais ; Medola, Fausto Orsi ; Baleotti, Luciana Ramos ; Sandnes, Frode Eika ; Vaezipour, Atiyeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_28237873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Assistive technology</topic><topic>Orthoses</topic><topic>Rapid prototyping</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medola, Fausto Orsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baleotti, Luciana Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandnes, Frode Eika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares</au><au>Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais</au><au>Medola, Fausto Orsi</au><au>Baleotti, Luciana Ramos</au><au>Sandnes, Frode Eika</au><au>Vaezipour, Atiyeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses</atitle><jtitle>Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-use evaluation.</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2021
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2823787
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
subjects 3D printing
Assistive technology
Orthoses
Rapid prototyping
title A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A13%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Differences%20Between%20Conventional%20Orthoses%20and%203D-Printed%20Orthoses&rft.jtitle=Lecture%20Notes%20in%20Networks%20and%20Systems&rft.au=Rodrigues,%20Ana%20Claudia%20Tavares&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2823787%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_28237873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true