Loading…
A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses
Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D prin...
Saved in:
Published in: | Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems 2021 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems |
container_volume | |
creator | Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais Medola, Fausto Orsi Baleotti, Luciana Ramos Sandnes, Frode Eika Vaezipour, Atiyeh |
description | Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-use evaluation. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2823787</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_2823787</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_28237873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirEKwjAQQLM4iPoP5wcUbIK0a20VN0Ud3EJIL3hQL5AcLf69DuLs9OC9N1f3Bq6vLPh0Qh4uOBJOEAN0FAImZI8ZdigTIkMbeUQWiuwGOCV5xPypjnswXXFOxIL9zy_VLLgh4-rLhVof9rf2WPhEWYgtx-RsWertxupam6quzD_PGzn0OVY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares ; Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais ; Medola, Fausto Orsi ; Baleotti, Luciana Ramos ; Sandnes, Frode Eika ; Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares ; Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais ; Medola, Fausto Orsi ; Baleotti, Luciana Ramos ; Sandnes, Frode Eika ; Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creatorcontrib><description>Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-use evaluation.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><subject>3D printing ; Assistive technology ; Orthoses ; Rapid prototyping</subject><ispartof>Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2021</ispartof><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,776,881,26544</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2823787$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medola, Fausto Orsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baleotti, Luciana Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandnes, Frode Eika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creatorcontrib><title>A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses</title><title>Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems</title><description>Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-use evaluation.</description><subject>3D printing</subject><subject>Assistive technology</subject><subject>Orthoses</subject><subject>Rapid prototyping</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirEKwjAQQLM4iPoP5wcUbIK0a20VN0Ud3EJIL3hQL5AcLf69DuLs9OC9N1f3Bq6vLPh0Qh4uOBJOEAN0FAImZI8ZdigTIkMbeUQWiuwGOCV5xPypjnswXXFOxIL9zy_VLLgh4-rLhVof9rf2WPhEWYgtx-RsWertxupam6quzD_PGzn0OVY</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares</creator><creator>Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais</creator><creator>Medola, Fausto Orsi</creator><creator>Baleotti, Luciana Ramos</creator><creator>Sandnes, Frode Eika</creator><creator>Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses</title><author>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares ; Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais ; Medola, Fausto Orsi ; Baleotti, Luciana Ramos ; Sandnes, Frode Eika ; Vaezipour, Atiyeh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_28237873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>3D printing</topic><topic>Assistive technology</topic><topic>Orthoses</topic><topic>Rapid prototyping</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medola, Fausto Orsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baleotti, Luciana Ramos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandnes, Frode Eika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaezipour, Atiyeh</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection><jtitle>Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodrigues, Ana Claudia Tavares</au><au>Garcez, Letícia Vasconcelos Morais</au><au>Medola, Fausto Orsi</au><au>Baleotti, Luciana Ramos</au><au>Sandnes, Frode Eika</au><au>Vaezipour, Atiyeh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses</atitle><jtitle>Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><abstract>Rapid prototyping and 3D printing technologies have been innovative options for orthotic development, that are assistive devices applied to any part of the body to different disabilities or injuries. The aim of the study was to investigate scientific evidence about the effectiveness of using 3D printed orthoses in relation to conventional orthoses, through a systematic literature review in the years 2010 to 2020. Scientific evidence identifies that there are improvements associated with the development and use of rapid prototyped and 3D printed orthoses however the publications found present were small in sample sizes and lack comprehensive end-use evaluation.</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 2021 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_cristin_nora_11250_2823787 |
source | NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives |
subjects | 3D printing Assistive technology Orthoses Rapid prototyping |
title | A Systematic Review of Differences Between Conventional Orthoses and 3D-Printed Orthoses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A13%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Differences%20Between%20Conventional%20Orthoses%20and%203D-Printed%20Orthoses&rft.jtitle=Lecture%20Notes%20in%20Networks%20and%20Systems&rft.au=Rodrigues,%20Ana%20Claudia%20Tavares&rft.date=2021&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_2823787%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_28237873%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |