Loading…

Coping with different system logics of standardization in regulatory regimes. Norwegian offshore experience

This paper addresses the role of standardization in risk governance and explores challenges when unifying different system logics and standardizations in the regulator-regulated relationships in different industrial, political, and cultural contexts. High-risk regulatory regimes have been at the for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland, Lindøe, Preben Hempel, Braut, Geir Sverre
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland
Lindøe, Preben Hempel
Braut, Geir Sverre
description This paper addresses the role of standardization in risk governance and explores challenges when unifying different system logics and standardizations in the regulator-regulated relationships in different industrial, political, and cultural contexts. High-risk regulatory regimes have been at the forefront in developing regulations management, founded on function-, purpose- and goal-based regulations. A key perspective in our analysis is to examine the importance of “standardization” as an institutional approach and regulatory mechanism. The new era of free trade and globalization causes constant reorganization in industries that are trying to seize opportunities and increase competitiveness. The high-risk industries today, therefore, are undergoing major changes, due to downsizing and mergers, which inevitably affect and challenge their safety levels. The paper bases its discussion on several empirical studies of industrial dynamics and innovation in petroleum, mainly from the empirical context of the North Sea petroleum region.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3097231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>11250_3097231</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30972313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi7sKwkAQANNYiPoP6wcoeSBiHRQrK_twJHvJ4mU37J7E-PVG8AOsZoqZZfIoZSBuYaTYQUPeoyJHsMki9hCkpdpAPFh03Dht6O0iCQMxKLbP4KLo9FXq0fZwEx1ndzw_3jpRBHwNqIRc4zpZeBcMNz-uku3lfC-vu1rJInHFoq7KsvyQVkV6OuZFVvzTfABL5EH6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Coping with different system logics of standardization in regulatory regimes. Norwegian offshore experience</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland ; Lindøe, Preben Hempel ; Braut, Geir Sverre</creator><creatorcontrib>Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland ; Lindøe, Preben Hempel ; Braut, Geir Sverre</creatorcontrib><description>This paper addresses the role of standardization in risk governance and explores challenges when unifying different system logics and standardizations in the regulator-regulated relationships in different industrial, political, and cultural contexts. High-risk regulatory regimes have been at the forefront in developing regulations management, founded on function-, purpose- and goal-based regulations. A key perspective in our analysis is to examine the importance of “standardization” as an institutional approach and regulatory mechanism. The new era of free trade and globalization causes constant reorganization in industries that are trying to seize opportunities and increase competitiveness. The high-risk industries today, therefore, are undergoing major changes, due to downsizing and mergers, which inevitably affect and challenge their safety levels. The paper bases its discussion on several empirical studies of industrial dynamics and innovation in petroleum, mainly from the empirical context of the North Sea petroleum region.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>samfunnssikkerhet</subject><creationdate>2023</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,26567</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/3097231$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindøe, Preben Hempel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braut, Geir Sverre</creatorcontrib><title>Coping with different system logics of standardization in regulatory regimes. Norwegian offshore experience</title><description>This paper addresses the role of standardization in risk governance and explores challenges when unifying different system logics and standardizations in the regulator-regulated relationships in different industrial, political, and cultural contexts. High-risk regulatory regimes have been at the forefront in developing regulations management, founded on function-, purpose- and goal-based regulations. A key perspective in our analysis is to examine the importance of “standardization” as an institutional approach and regulatory mechanism. The new era of free trade and globalization causes constant reorganization in industries that are trying to seize opportunities and increase competitiveness. The high-risk industries today, therefore, are undergoing major changes, due to downsizing and mergers, which inevitably affect and challenge their safety levels. The paper bases its discussion on several empirical studies of industrial dynamics and innovation in petroleum, mainly from the empirical context of the North Sea petroleum region.</description><subject>samfunnssikkerhet</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqNi7sKwkAQANNYiPoP6wcoeSBiHRQrK_twJHvJ4mU37J7E-PVG8AOsZoqZZfIoZSBuYaTYQUPeoyJHsMki9hCkpdpAPFh03Dht6O0iCQMxKLbP4KLo9FXq0fZwEx1ndzw_3jpRBHwNqIRc4zpZeBcMNz-uku3lfC-vu1rJInHFoq7KsvyQVkV6OuZFVvzTfABL5EH6</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland</creator><creator>Lindøe, Preben Hempel</creator><creator>Braut, Geir Sverre</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Coping with different system logics of standardization in regulatory regimes. Norwegian offshore experience</title><author>Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland ; Lindøe, Preben Hempel ; Braut, Geir Sverre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30972313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>samfunnssikkerhet</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindøe, Preben Hempel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Braut, Geir Sverre</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Engen, Ole Andreas Hegland</au><au>Lindøe, Preben Hempel</au><au>Braut, Geir Sverre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Coping with different system logics of standardization in regulatory regimes. Norwegian offshore experience</atitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><abstract>This paper addresses the role of standardization in risk governance and explores challenges when unifying different system logics and standardizations in the regulator-regulated relationships in different industrial, political, and cultural contexts. High-risk regulatory regimes have been at the forefront in developing regulations management, founded on function-, purpose- and goal-based regulations. A key perspective in our analysis is to examine the importance of “standardization” as an institutional approach and regulatory mechanism. The new era of free trade and globalization causes constant reorganization in industries that are trying to seize opportunities and increase competitiveness. The high-risk industries today, therefore, are undergoing major changes, due to downsizing and mergers, which inevitably affect and challenge their safety levels. The paper bases its discussion on several empirical studies of industrial dynamics and innovation in petroleum, mainly from the empirical context of the North Sea petroleum region.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_11250_3097231
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
subjects samfunnssikkerhet
title Coping with different system logics of standardization in regulatory regimes. Norwegian offshore experience
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A21%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Coping%20with%20different%20system%20logics%20of%20standardization%20in%20regulatory%20regimes.%20Norwegian%20offshore%20experience&rft.au=Engen,%20Ole%20Andreas%20Hegland&rft.date=2023&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E11250_3097231%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_11250_30972313%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true