Loading…

Observing system evaluation based on ocean data assimilation and prediction systems: On-going challenges and future vision for designing/supporting ocean observational networks

This paper summarizes recent efforts on Observing System Evaluation (OS-Eval) by the Ocean Data Assimilation and Prediction (ODAP) communities such as GODAE OceanView and CLIVAR-GSOP. It provides some examples of existing OS-Eval methodologies, and attempts to discuss the potential and limitation of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fujii, Yosuke, Rémy, Elisabeth, Hao, Zuo, Oke, Peter, Halliwell, George, Gasparin, Florent, Benkiran, Mounir, Loose, Nora, Cummings, James, Xie, Jiping, Xue, Yan, Masuda, Shuhei, Smith, Gregory C, Balmaseda, Magdalena, Germineaud, Cyril, Lea, Daniel J, Larnicol, Gilles, Bertino, Laurent, Bonaduce, Antonio, Brasseur, Pierre, Donion, Craig, Heimbach, Patrick, Kim, YoungHo, Kourafalou, Villy, Le Traon, Pierre-Yves, Martin, Matthew, Paturi, Shastri, Tranchant, Benoit, Usui, Norihisa
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Request full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Fujii, Yosuke
Rémy, Elisabeth
Hao, Zuo
Oke, Peter
Halliwell, George
Gasparin, Florent
Benkiran, Mounir
Loose, Nora
Cummings, James
Xie, Jiping
Xue, Yan
Masuda, Shuhei
Smith, Gregory C
Balmaseda, Magdalena
Germineaud, Cyril
Lea, Daniel J
Larnicol, Gilles
Bertino, Laurent
Bonaduce, Antonio
Brasseur, Pierre
Donion, Craig
Heimbach, Patrick
Kim, YoungHo
Kourafalou, Villy
Le Traon, Pierre-Yves
Martin, Matthew
Paturi, Shastri
Tranchant, Benoit
Usui, Norihisa
description This paper summarizes recent efforts on Observing System Evaluation (OS-Eval) by the Ocean Data Assimilation and Prediction (ODAP) communities such as GODAE OceanView and CLIVAR-GSOP. It provides some examples of existing OS-Eval methodologies, and attempts to discuss the potential and limitation of the existing approaches. Observing System Experiment (OSE) studies illustrate the impacts of the severe decrease in the number of TAO buoys during 2012–2014 and TRITON buoys since 2013 on ODAP system performance. Multi-system evaluation of the impacts of assimilating satellite sea surface salinity data based on OSEs has been performed to demonstrate the need to continue and enhance satellite salinity missions. Impacts of underwater gliders have been assessed using Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) to provide guidance on the effective coordination of the western North Atlantic observing system elements. OSSEs are also being performed under H2020 AtlantOS project with the goal to enhance and optimize the Atlantic in-situ networks. Potential of future satellite missions of wide-swath altimetry and surface ocean currents monitoring is explored through OSSEs and evaluation of Degrees of Freedom for Signal (DFS). Forecast Sensitivity Observation Impacts (FSOI) are routinely evaluated for monitoring the ocean observation impacts in the US Navy's ODAP system. Perspectives on the extension of OS-Eval to coastal regions, the deep ocean, polar regions, coupled data assimilation, and biogeochemical applications are also presented. Based on the examples above, we identify the limitations of OS-Eval, indicating that the most significant limitation is reduction of robustness and reliability of the results due to their system-dependency. The difficulty of performing evaluation in near real time is also critical. A strategy to mitigate the limitation and to strengthen the impact of evaluations is discussed. In particular, we emphasize the importance of collaboration within the ODAP community for multi-system evaluation and of communication with ocean observational communities on the design of OS-Eval, required resources, and effective distribution of the results. Finally, we recommend further developing OS-Eval activities at international level with the support of the international ODAP (e.g., OceanPredict and CLIVAR-GSOP) and observational communities.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>cristin_3HK</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_cristin_nora_1956_21986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1956_21986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-cristin_nora_1956_219863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjr0OwjAMhLswIOAVkF-gQgVRUVYEYuvCXpnGDRGpU8VpEW_FI9IfdqbzSd_deR598ruQ7wxrkLcEqoE6tC0G4xjuKKSgP1xJyKAwIKCIqY2dAGQFjSdlytFODXKEnGPths7ygdYSa5KRrdrQeoLOyIBXzoMiMZp7dCNt0zgfhtQ058bPxiG0wBRezj9lGc0qtEKrny6i9eV8O13j0hvp0wU7j0WS7dNim2SHdPcX-AISL1tz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Observing system evaluation based on ocean data assimilation and prediction systems: On-going challenges and future vision for designing/supporting ocean observational networks</title><source>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</source><creator>Fujii, Yosuke ; Rémy, Elisabeth ; Hao, Zuo ; Oke, Peter ; Halliwell, George ; Gasparin, Florent ; Benkiran, Mounir ; Loose, Nora ; Cummings, James ; Xie, Jiping ; Xue, Yan ; Masuda, Shuhei ; Smith, Gregory C ; Balmaseda, Magdalena ; Germineaud, Cyril ; Lea, Daniel J ; Larnicol, Gilles ; Bertino, Laurent ; Bonaduce, Antonio ; Brasseur, Pierre ; Donion, Craig ; Heimbach, Patrick ; Kim, YoungHo ; Kourafalou, Villy ; Le Traon, Pierre-Yves ; Martin, Matthew ; Paturi, Shastri ; Tranchant, Benoit ; Usui, Norihisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yosuke ; Rémy, Elisabeth ; Hao, Zuo ; Oke, Peter ; Halliwell, George ; Gasparin, Florent ; Benkiran, Mounir ; Loose, Nora ; Cummings, James ; Xie, Jiping ; Xue, Yan ; Masuda, Shuhei ; Smith, Gregory C ; Balmaseda, Magdalena ; Germineaud, Cyril ; Lea, Daniel J ; Larnicol, Gilles ; Bertino, Laurent ; Bonaduce, Antonio ; Brasseur, Pierre ; Donion, Craig ; Heimbach, Patrick ; Kim, YoungHo ; Kourafalou, Villy ; Le Traon, Pierre-Yves ; Martin, Matthew ; Paturi, Shastri ; Tranchant, Benoit ; Usui, Norihisa</creatorcontrib><description>This paper summarizes recent efforts on Observing System Evaluation (OS-Eval) by the Ocean Data Assimilation and Prediction (ODAP) communities such as GODAE OceanView and CLIVAR-GSOP. It provides some examples of existing OS-Eval methodologies, and attempts to discuss the potential and limitation of the existing approaches. Observing System Experiment (OSE) studies illustrate the impacts of the severe decrease in the number of TAO buoys during 2012–2014 and TRITON buoys since 2013 on ODAP system performance. Multi-system evaluation of the impacts of assimilating satellite sea surface salinity data based on OSEs has been performed to demonstrate the need to continue and enhance satellite salinity missions. Impacts of underwater gliders have been assessed using Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) to provide guidance on the effective coordination of the western North Atlantic observing system elements. OSSEs are also being performed under H2020 AtlantOS project with the goal to enhance and optimize the Atlantic in-situ networks. Potential of future satellite missions of wide-swath altimetry and surface ocean currents monitoring is explored through OSSEs and evaluation of Degrees of Freedom for Signal (DFS). Forecast Sensitivity Observation Impacts (FSOI) are routinely evaluated for monitoring the ocean observation impacts in the US Navy's ODAP system. Perspectives on the extension of OS-Eval to coastal regions, the deep ocean, polar regions, coupled data assimilation, and biogeochemical applications are also presented. Based on the examples above, we identify the limitations of OS-Eval, indicating that the most significant limitation is reduction of robustness and reliability of the results due to their system-dependency. The difficulty of performing evaluation in near real time is also critical. A strategy to mitigate the limitation and to strengthen the impact of evaluations is discussed. In particular, we emphasize the importance of collaboration within the ODAP community for multi-system evaluation and of communication with ocean observational communities on the design of OS-Eval, required resources, and effective distribution of the results. Finally, we recommend further developing OS-Eval activities at international level with the support of the international ODAP (e.g., OceanPredict and CLIVAR-GSOP) and observational communities.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Frontiers</publisher><creationdate>2019</creationdate><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,780,885,26567</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/1956/21986$$EView_record_in_NORA$$FView_record_in_$$GNORA$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rémy, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Zuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oke, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliwell, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparin, Florent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benkiran, Mounir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loose, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Shuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gregory C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balmaseda, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Germineaud, Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lea, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larnicol, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertino, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonaduce, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasseur, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donion, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heimbach, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, YoungHo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kourafalou, Villy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Traon, Pierre-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paturi, Shastri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranchant, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usui, Norihisa</creatorcontrib><title>Observing system evaluation based on ocean data assimilation and prediction systems: On-going challenges and future vision for designing/supporting ocean observational networks</title><description>This paper summarizes recent efforts on Observing System Evaluation (OS-Eval) by the Ocean Data Assimilation and Prediction (ODAP) communities such as GODAE OceanView and CLIVAR-GSOP. It provides some examples of existing OS-Eval methodologies, and attempts to discuss the potential and limitation of the existing approaches. Observing System Experiment (OSE) studies illustrate the impacts of the severe decrease in the number of TAO buoys during 2012–2014 and TRITON buoys since 2013 on ODAP system performance. Multi-system evaluation of the impacts of assimilating satellite sea surface salinity data based on OSEs has been performed to demonstrate the need to continue and enhance satellite salinity missions. Impacts of underwater gliders have been assessed using Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) to provide guidance on the effective coordination of the western North Atlantic observing system elements. OSSEs are also being performed under H2020 AtlantOS project with the goal to enhance and optimize the Atlantic in-situ networks. Potential of future satellite missions of wide-swath altimetry and surface ocean currents monitoring is explored through OSSEs and evaluation of Degrees of Freedom for Signal (DFS). Forecast Sensitivity Observation Impacts (FSOI) are routinely evaluated for monitoring the ocean observation impacts in the US Navy's ODAP system. Perspectives on the extension of OS-Eval to coastal regions, the deep ocean, polar regions, coupled data assimilation, and biogeochemical applications are also presented. Based on the examples above, we identify the limitations of OS-Eval, indicating that the most significant limitation is reduction of robustness and reliability of the results due to their system-dependency. The difficulty of performing evaluation in near real time is also critical. A strategy to mitigate the limitation and to strengthen the impact of evaluations is discussed. In particular, we emphasize the importance of collaboration within the ODAP community for multi-system evaluation and of communication with ocean observational communities on the design of OS-Eval, required resources, and effective distribution of the results. Finally, we recommend further developing OS-Eval activities at international level with the support of the international ODAP (e.g., OceanPredict and CLIVAR-GSOP) and observational communities.</description><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>3HK</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjr0OwjAMhLswIOAVkF-gQgVRUVYEYuvCXpnGDRGpU8VpEW_FI9IfdqbzSd_deR598ruQ7wxrkLcEqoE6tC0G4xjuKKSgP1xJyKAwIKCIqY2dAGQFjSdlytFODXKEnGPths7ygdYSa5KRrdrQeoLOyIBXzoMiMZp7dCNt0zgfhtQ058bPxiG0wBRezj9lGc0qtEKrny6i9eV8O13j0hvp0wU7j0WS7dNim2SHdPcX-AISL1tz</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Fujii, Yosuke</creator><creator>Rémy, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Hao, Zuo</creator><creator>Oke, Peter</creator><creator>Halliwell, George</creator><creator>Gasparin, Florent</creator><creator>Benkiran, Mounir</creator><creator>Loose, Nora</creator><creator>Cummings, James</creator><creator>Xie, Jiping</creator><creator>Xue, Yan</creator><creator>Masuda, Shuhei</creator><creator>Smith, Gregory C</creator><creator>Balmaseda, Magdalena</creator><creator>Germineaud, Cyril</creator><creator>Lea, Daniel J</creator><creator>Larnicol, Gilles</creator><creator>Bertino, Laurent</creator><creator>Bonaduce, Antonio</creator><creator>Brasseur, Pierre</creator><creator>Donion, Craig</creator><creator>Heimbach, Patrick</creator><creator>Kim, YoungHo</creator><creator>Kourafalou, Villy</creator><creator>Le Traon, Pierre-Yves</creator><creator>Martin, Matthew</creator><creator>Paturi, Shastri</creator><creator>Tranchant, Benoit</creator><creator>Usui, Norihisa</creator><general>Frontiers</general><scope>3HK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Observing system evaluation based on ocean data assimilation and prediction systems: On-going challenges and future vision for designing/supporting ocean observational networks</title><author>Fujii, Yosuke ; Rémy, Elisabeth ; Hao, Zuo ; Oke, Peter ; Halliwell, George ; Gasparin, Florent ; Benkiran, Mounir ; Loose, Nora ; Cummings, James ; Xie, Jiping ; Xue, Yan ; Masuda, Shuhei ; Smith, Gregory C ; Balmaseda, Magdalena ; Germineaud, Cyril ; Lea, Daniel J ; Larnicol, Gilles ; Bertino, Laurent ; Bonaduce, Antonio ; Brasseur, Pierre ; Donion, Craig ; Heimbach, Patrick ; Kim, YoungHo ; Kourafalou, Villy ; Le Traon, Pierre-Yves ; Martin, Matthew ; Paturi, Shastri ; Tranchant, Benoit ; Usui, Norihisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_1956_219863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rémy, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hao, Zuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oke, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halliwell, George</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gasparin, Florent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benkiran, Mounir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loose, Nora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Jiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masuda, Shuhei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Gregory C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balmaseda, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Germineaud, Cyril</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lea, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larnicol, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertino, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonaduce, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brasseur, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donion, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heimbach, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, YoungHo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kourafalou, Villy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Traon, Pierre-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paturi, Shastri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tranchant, Benoit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Usui, Norihisa</creatorcontrib><collection>NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fujii, Yosuke</au><au>Rémy, Elisabeth</au><au>Hao, Zuo</au><au>Oke, Peter</au><au>Halliwell, George</au><au>Gasparin, Florent</au><au>Benkiran, Mounir</au><au>Loose, Nora</au><au>Cummings, James</au><au>Xie, Jiping</au><au>Xue, Yan</au><au>Masuda, Shuhei</au><au>Smith, Gregory C</au><au>Balmaseda, Magdalena</au><au>Germineaud, Cyril</au><au>Lea, Daniel J</au><au>Larnicol, Gilles</au><au>Bertino, Laurent</au><au>Bonaduce, Antonio</au><au>Brasseur, Pierre</au><au>Donion, Craig</au><au>Heimbach, Patrick</au><au>Kim, YoungHo</au><au>Kourafalou, Villy</au><au>Le Traon, Pierre-Yves</au><au>Martin, Matthew</au><au>Paturi, Shastri</au><au>Tranchant, Benoit</au><au>Usui, Norihisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Observing system evaluation based on ocean data assimilation and prediction systems: On-going challenges and future vision for designing/supporting ocean observational networks</atitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>This paper summarizes recent efforts on Observing System Evaluation (OS-Eval) by the Ocean Data Assimilation and Prediction (ODAP) communities such as GODAE OceanView and CLIVAR-GSOP. It provides some examples of existing OS-Eval methodologies, and attempts to discuss the potential and limitation of the existing approaches. Observing System Experiment (OSE) studies illustrate the impacts of the severe decrease in the number of TAO buoys during 2012–2014 and TRITON buoys since 2013 on ODAP system performance. Multi-system evaluation of the impacts of assimilating satellite sea surface salinity data based on OSEs has been performed to demonstrate the need to continue and enhance satellite salinity missions. Impacts of underwater gliders have been assessed using Observing System Simulation Experiments (OSSEs) to provide guidance on the effective coordination of the western North Atlantic observing system elements. OSSEs are also being performed under H2020 AtlantOS project with the goal to enhance and optimize the Atlantic in-situ networks. Potential of future satellite missions of wide-swath altimetry and surface ocean currents monitoring is explored through OSSEs and evaluation of Degrees of Freedom for Signal (DFS). Forecast Sensitivity Observation Impacts (FSOI) are routinely evaluated for monitoring the ocean observation impacts in the US Navy's ODAP system. Perspectives on the extension of OS-Eval to coastal regions, the deep ocean, polar regions, coupled data assimilation, and biogeochemical applications are also presented. Based on the examples above, we identify the limitations of OS-Eval, indicating that the most significant limitation is reduction of robustness and reliability of the results due to their system-dependency. The difficulty of performing evaluation in near real time is also critical. A strategy to mitigate the limitation and to strengthen the impact of evaluations is discussed. In particular, we emphasize the importance of collaboration within the ODAP community for multi-system evaluation and of communication with ocean observational communities on the design of OS-Eval, required resources, and effective distribution of the results. Finally, we recommend further developing OS-Eval activities at international level with the support of the international ODAP (e.g., OceanPredict and CLIVAR-GSOP) and observational communities.</abstract><pub>Frontiers</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_cristin_nora_1956_21986
source NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
title Observing system evaluation based on ocean data assimilation and prediction systems: On-going challenges and future vision for designing/supporting ocean observational networks
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T00%3A46%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-cristin_3HK&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Observing%20system%20evaluation%20based%20on%20ocean%20data%20assimilation%20and%20prediction%20systems:%20On-going%20challenges%20and%20future%20vision%20for%20designing/supporting%20ocean%20observational%20networks&rft.au=Fujii,%20Yosuke&rft.date=2019&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ccristin_3HK%3E1956_21986%3C/cristin_3HK%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-cristin_nora_1956_219863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true