Loading…
Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions
Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar sh...
Saved in:
Published in: | Aggressive behavior 2003-03, Vol.29 (2), p.95-106 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3 |
container_end_page | 106 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Aggressive behavior |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Zeichner, Amos Parrott, Dominic J. Frey, F. Charles |
description | Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar shocks or to refrain from any retaliation. Results indicated that men administered more shocks, chose more intense shocks, and administered the highest available shock at a greater proportion relative to all their shock selections than did women. In contrast, women evinced a longer latency before becoming aggressive and initiated aggression at lower intensities than did men. Moreover, across shock trials, gender‐specific aggression patterns indicated that while men alternated response frequency, women gradually increased their response frequency to a peak close to the end of the task. The results confirm earlier findings of gender differences in aggression and offer new indices of aggression “flashpoint” as a step closer to understanding aggressive behavior in naturalistic circumstances. Aggr. Behav. 29:95–106, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ab.10030 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ab_10030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_2JDTMXGZ_M</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DtPwzAUBWALgUQpSPyELEgsgWs7dpKxFAigFpYiKhbLz2IISWUXQf896QOYmI6u7qczHISOMZxhAHIu1Sop7KAehrJICaX5LuoBlDzFGUz30UGMrwAYZwx6aFTZxtiQGO-cDbbRNia-SWqp2iAXbVgmcjYLNkbfNsnHmnbXvG2iTfRL63UXbWP8ovvHQ7TnZB3t0Tb76PH6ajK8SUcP1e1wMEo1pRhSXTpWZCQ31tIyL5gh2CnAWQnUZcw4TZRRDHPFuSbSFNqWBWXKUsqwBONoH51uenVoYwzWiXnw7zIsBQaxWkFIJdYrdPRkQ-cyalm7IBvt45_POCcZX7l04z59bZf_9onBxU_v1vu4sF-_XoY3wXOaM_F0XwlydzkZT6tnMabfrAN6SQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Zeichner, Amos ; Parrott, Dominic J. ; Frey, F. Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeichner, Amos ; Parrott, Dominic J. ; Frey, F. Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar shocks or to refrain from any retaliation. Results indicated that men administered more shocks, chose more intense shocks, and administered the highest available shock at a greater proportion relative to all their shock selections than did women. In contrast, women evinced a longer latency before becoming aggressive and initiated aggression at lower intensities than did men. Moreover, across shock trials, gender‐specific aggression patterns indicated that while men alternated response frequency, women gradually increased their response frequency to a peak close to the end of the task. The results confirm earlier findings of gender differences in aggression and offer new indices of aggression “flashpoint” as a step closer to understanding aggressive behavior in naturalistic circumstances. Aggr. Behav. 29:95–106, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-140X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2337</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ab.10030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGBEDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>aggression ; Behavior. Attitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; flash point ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gender differences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; shock trials ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Aggressive behavior, 2003-03, Vol.29 (2), p.95-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14662460$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeichner, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrott, Dominic J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, F. Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions</title><title>Aggressive behavior</title><addtitle>Aggr. Behav</addtitle><description>Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar shocks or to refrain from any retaliation. Results indicated that men administered more shocks, chose more intense shocks, and administered the highest available shock at a greater proportion relative to all their shock selections than did women. In contrast, women evinced a longer latency before becoming aggressive and initiated aggression at lower intensities than did men. Moreover, across shock trials, gender‐specific aggression patterns indicated that while men alternated response frequency, women gradually increased their response frequency to a peak close to the end of the task. The results confirm earlier findings of gender differences in aggression and offer new indices of aggression “flashpoint” as a step closer to understanding aggressive behavior in naturalistic circumstances. Aggr. Behav. 29:95–106, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>aggression</subject><subject>Behavior. Attitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>flash point</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>shock trials</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0096-140X</issn><issn>1098-2337</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10DtPwzAUBWALgUQpSPyELEgsgWs7dpKxFAigFpYiKhbLz2IISWUXQf896QOYmI6u7qczHISOMZxhAHIu1Sop7KAehrJICaX5LuoBlDzFGUz30UGMrwAYZwx6aFTZxtiQGO-cDbbRNia-SWqp2iAXbVgmcjYLNkbfNsnHmnbXvG2iTfRL63UXbWP8ovvHQ7TnZB3t0Tb76PH6ajK8SUcP1e1wMEo1pRhSXTpWZCQ31tIyL5gh2CnAWQnUZcw4TZRRDHPFuSbSFNqWBWXKUsqwBONoH51uenVoYwzWiXnw7zIsBQaxWkFIJdYrdPRkQ-cyalm7IBvt45_POCcZX7l04z59bZf_9onBxU_v1vu4sF-_XoY3wXOaM_F0XwlydzkZT6tnMabfrAN6SQ</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Zeichner, Amos</creator><creator>Parrott, Dominic J.</creator><creator>Frey, F. Charles</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions</title><author>Zeichner, Amos ; Parrott, Dominic J. ; Frey, F. Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>aggression</topic><topic>Behavior. Attitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>flash point</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>shock trials</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeichner, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrott, Dominic J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, F. Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Aggressive behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeichner, Amos</au><au>Parrott, Dominic J.</au><au>Frey, F. Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions</atitle><jtitle>Aggressive behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Aggr. Behav</addtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>95-106</pages><issn>0096-140X</issn><eissn>1098-2337</eissn><coden>AGBEDU</coden><abstract>Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar shocks or to refrain from any retaliation. Results indicated that men administered more shocks, chose more intense shocks, and administered the highest available shock at a greater proportion relative to all their shock selections than did women. In contrast, women evinced a longer latency before becoming aggressive and initiated aggression at lower intensities than did men. Moreover, across shock trials, gender‐specific aggression patterns indicated that while men alternated response frequency, women gradually increased their response frequency to a peak close to the end of the task. The results confirm earlier findings of gender differences in aggression and offer new indices of aggression “flashpoint” as a step closer to understanding aggressive behavior in naturalistic circumstances. Aggr. Behav. 29:95–106, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/ab.10030</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0096-140X |
ispartof | Aggressive behavior, 2003-03, Vol.29 (2), p.95-106 |
issn | 0096-140X 1098-2337 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ab_10030 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | aggression Behavior. Attitude Biological and medical sciences flash point Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology gender differences Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology shock trials Social psychology |
title | Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A42%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20differences%20in%20laboratory%20aggression%20under%20response%20choice%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Aggressive%20behavior&rft.au=Zeichner,%20Amos&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=95-106&rft.issn=0096-140X&rft.eissn=1098-2337&rft.coden=AGBEDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ab.10030&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_2JDTMXGZ_M%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |