Loading…

Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions

Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar sh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Aggressive behavior 2003-03, Vol.29 (2), p.95-106
Main Authors: Zeichner, Amos, Parrott, Dominic J., Frey, F. Charles
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3
container_end_page 106
container_issue 2
container_start_page 95
container_title Aggressive behavior
container_volume 29
creator Zeichner, Amos
Parrott, Dominic J.
Frey, F. Charles
description Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar shocks or to refrain from any retaliation. Results indicated that men administered more shocks, chose more intense shocks, and administered the highest available shock at a greater proportion relative to all their shock selections than did women. In contrast, women evinced a longer latency before becoming aggressive and initiated aggression at lower intensities than did men. Moreover, across shock trials, gender‐specific aggression patterns indicated that while men alternated response frequency, women gradually increased their response frequency to a peak close to the end of the task. The results confirm earlier findings of gender differences in aggression and offer new indices of aggression “flashpoint” as a step closer to understanding aggressive behavior in naturalistic circumstances. Aggr. Behav. 29:95–106, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ab.10030
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ab_10030</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_2JDTMXGZ_M</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10DtPwzAUBWALgUQpSPyELEgsgWs7dpKxFAigFpYiKhbLz2IISWUXQf896QOYmI6u7qczHISOMZxhAHIu1Sop7KAehrJICaX5LuoBlDzFGUz30UGMrwAYZwx6aFTZxtiQGO-cDbbRNia-SWqp2iAXbVgmcjYLNkbfNsnHmnbXvG2iTfRL63UXbWP8ovvHQ7TnZB3t0Tb76PH6ajK8SUcP1e1wMEo1pRhSXTpWZCQ31tIyL5gh2CnAWQnUZcw4TZRRDHPFuSbSFNqWBWXKUsqwBONoH51uenVoYwzWiXnw7zIsBQaxWkFIJdYrdPRkQ-cyalm7IBvt45_POCcZX7l04z59bZf_9onBxU_v1vu4sF-_XoY3wXOaM_F0XwlydzkZT6tnMabfrAN6SQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Zeichner, Amos ; Parrott, Dominic J. ; Frey, F. Charles</creator><creatorcontrib>Zeichner, Amos ; Parrott, Dominic J. ; Frey, F. Charles</creatorcontrib><description>Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar shocks or to refrain from any retaliation. Results indicated that men administered more shocks, chose more intense shocks, and administered the highest available shock at a greater proportion relative to all their shock selections than did women. In contrast, women evinced a longer latency before becoming aggressive and initiated aggression at lower intensities than did men. Moreover, across shock trials, gender‐specific aggression patterns indicated that while men alternated response frequency, women gradually increased their response frequency to a peak close to the end of the task. The results confirm earlier findings of gender differences in aggression and offer new indices of aggression “flashpoint” as a step closer to understanding aggressive behavior in naturalistic circumstances. Aggr. Behav. 29:95–106, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0096-140X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2337</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ab.10030</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGBEDU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>aggression ; Behavior. Attitude ; Biological and medical sciences ; flash point ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gender differences ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; shock trials ; Social psychology</subject><ispartof>Aggressive behavior, 2003-03, Vol.29 (2), p.95-106</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14662460$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zeichner, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrott, Dominic J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, F. Charles</creatorcontrib><title>Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions</title><title>Aggressive behavior</title><addtitle>Aggr. Behav</addtitle><description>Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar shocks or to refrain from any retaliation. Results indicated that men administered more shocks, chose more intense shocks, and administered the highest available shock at a greater proportion relative to all their shock selections than did women. In contrast, women evinced a longer latency before becoming aggressive and initiated aggression at lower intensities than did men. Moreover, across shock trials, gender‐specific aggression patterns indicated that while men alternated response frequency, women gradually increased their response frequency to a peak close to the end of the task. The results confirm earlier findings of gender differences in aggression and offer new indices of aggression “flashpoint” as a step closer to understanding aggressive behavior in naturalistic circumstances. Aggr. Behav. 29:95–106, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</description><subject>aggression</subject><subject>Behavior. Attitude</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>flash point</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gender differences</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>shock trials</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><issn>0096-140X</issn><issn>1098-2337</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10DtPwzAUBWALgUQpSPyELEgsgWs7dpKxFAigFpYiKhbLz2IISWUXQf896QOYmI6u7qczHISOMZxhAHIu1Sop7KAehrJICaX5LuoBlDzFGUz30UGMrwAYZwx6aFTZxtiQGO-cDbbRNia-SWqp2iAXbVgmcjYLNkbfNsnHmnbXvG2iTfRL63UXbWP8ovvHQ7TnZB3t0Tb76PH6ajK8SUcP1e1wMEo1pRhSXTpWZCQ31tIyL5gh2CnAWQnUZcw4TZRRDHPFuSbSFNqWBWXKUsqwBONoH51uenVoYwzWiXnw7zIsBQaxWkFIJdYrdPRkQ-cyalm7IBvt45_POCcZX7l04z59bZf_9onBxU_v1vu4sF-_XoY3wXOaM_F0XwlydzkZT6tnMabfrAN6SQ</recordid><startdate>200303</startdate><enddate>200303</enddate><creator>Zeichner, Amos</creator><creator>Parrott, Dominic J.</creator><creator>Frey, F. Charles</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200303</creationdate><title>Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions</title><author>Zeichner, Amos ; Parrott, Dominic J. ; Frey, F. Charles</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>aggression</topic><topic>Behavior. Attitude</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>flash point</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gender differences</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>shock trials</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zeichner, Amos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrott, Dominic J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frey, F. Charles</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Aggressive behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zeichner, Amos</au><au>Parrott, Dominic J.</au><au>Frey, F. Charles</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions</atitle><jtitle>Aggressive behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Aggr. Behav</addtitle><date>2003-03</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>106</epage><pages>95-106</pages><issn>0096-140X</issn><eissn>1098-2337</eissn><coden>AGBEDU</coden><abstract>Eighty‐four undergraduate student volunteers were tested on the Response Choice Aggression Paradigm [Zeichner et al., 1999]. Men (n=43) and women (n=41) participants were provoked in a reaction time competition by receiving electric shocks and were allowed to respond to a confederate with similar shocks or to refrain from any retaliation. Results indicated that men administered more shocks, chose more intense shocks, and administered the highest available shock at a greater proportion relative to all their shock selections than did women. In contrast, women evinced a longer latency before becoming aggressive and initiated aggression at lower intensities than did men. Moreover, across shock trials, gender‐specific aggression patterns indicated that while men alternated response frequency, women gradually increased their response frequency to a peak close to the end of the task. The results confirm earlier findings of gender differences in aggression and offer new indices of aggression “flashpoint” as a step closer to understanding aggressive behavior in naturalistic circumstances. Aggr. Behav. 29:95–106, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/ab.10030</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0096-140X
ispartof Aggressive behavior, 2003-03, Vol.29 (2), p.95-106
issn 0096-140X
1098-2337
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_ab_10030
source Wiley
subjects aggression
Behavior. Attitude
Biological and medical sciences
flash point
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
gender differences
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
shock trials
Social psychology
title Gender differences in laboratory aggression under response choice conditions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T12%3A42%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gender%20differences%20in%20laboratory%20aggression%20under%20response%20choice%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Aggressive%20behavior&rft.au=Zeichner,%20Amos&rft.date=2003-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=106&rft.pages=95-106&rft.issn=0096-140X&rft.eissn=1098-2337&rft.coden=AGBEDU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ab.10030&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_2JDTMXGZ_M%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3310-c9f58427dee39785d21fb014903f45dfc2bdb516b66c2ad8ce9835be3351a0df3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true