Loading…
Agronomic impacts of new regulations governing land application of Class B biosolids in Florida
Although land application of biosolids is an attractive option for beneficial reuse, it represents a complex challenge for government and private organizations. This 3‐year field study evaluated the agronomic impacts of reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida on bahiagrass (Pas...
Saved in:
Published in: | Agronomy journal 2024-01, Vol.116 (1), p.141-152 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2320-7187a73501976be17486ec564c6a5b430050ee0be49c9dcee604c6aa76aa782e3 |
container_end_page | 152 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 141 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Vieira‐Filho, Leandro O. Silveira, Maria L. Kohmann, Marta M. Sollenberger, Lynn E. Sanchez, Joao M. D. Cardoso, Abmael S. Ricken, Ester C. |
description | Although land application of biosolids is an attractive option for beneficial reuse, it represents a complex challenge for government and private organizations. This 3‐year field study evaluated the agronomic impacts of reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida on bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge) herbage accumulation and nutritive value. Treatments consisted of a factorial combination of two phosphorus (P) sources (triple superphosphate and biosolids) applied at 0 (control), 20 (low), 40 (intermediate), and 60 kg total P ha−1 (high). Triple superphosphate plots received the same nitrogen (N) load (from ammonium nitrate) as the corresponding biosolids treatments. Bahiagrass herbage accumulation increased with increasing P and associated N rates. Bahiagrass annual herbage accumulation ranged from 2120 kg ha−1 in 2022 to 6970 kg ha−1 in 2020 and was 33%–80% less than previously published data. This was likely due to the reduced biosolids rates that did not supply sufficient N and P to sustain adequate forage production. Lesser herbage accumulation will likely lead to greater application of inorganic fertilizers, which generally have greater environmental footprint than biosolids. Biosolids generally resulted in either similar or greater bahiagrass crude protein, in vitro digestible organic matter, and tissue mineral concentrations than inorganic fertilizer. Similarly, no differences in bahiagrass N and P recovery between biosolids and inorganic fertilizer were observed. This study, along with a significant body of literature, demonstrated that biosolids have considerable fertilizer value and can be an effective alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizer while also providing environmental and economic benefits.
Core Ideas
Biosolids application at P‐based rates decreases forage production and nutritive value.
Reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida will have negative agronomic impacts.
Biosolids are an effective alternative source of N and P to replace inorganic fertilizer. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/agj2.21510 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_21510</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>AGJ221510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2320-7187a73501976be17486ec564c6a5b430050ee0be49c9dcee604c6aa76aa782e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQQBujiYhe_IKeTRan3bbLHpEIaEi86LnpdodNSWk3LUr4e1nw7GEyh_dmDo-QRwYTBsCfTbflE84kgysyYqKUBSghr8kITrRgteK35C7nLQBjtWAjomddiiHunKVu1xu7zzRuaMADTdh9e7N3MWTaxR9MwYWOehNaavreO3tmgz33Jmf6QhsXc_SuzdQFuvAxudbck5uN8Rkf_vaYfC1eP-erYv2xfJvP1oXlJYeiYtPKVKUEVleqQVaJqUIrlbDKyEaUABIQoUFR27q1iAoGZKphphzLMXm6_LUp5pxwo_vkdiYdNQM9pNFDGn1Oc5LZRT44j8d_TD1bvvPLzS_RFmZC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agronomic impacts of new regulations governing land application of Class B biosolids in Florida</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Vieira‐Filho, Leandro O. ; Silveira, Maria L. ; Kohmann, Marta M. ; Sollenberger, Lynn E. ; Sanchez, Joao M. D. ; Cardoso, Abmael S. ; Ricken, Ester C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vieira‐Filho, Leandro O. ; Silveira, Maria L. ; Kohmann, Marta M. ; Sollenberger, Lynn E. ; Sanchez, Joao M. D. ; Cardoso, Abmael S. ; Ricken, Ester C.</creatorcontrib><description>Although land application of biosolids is an attractive option for beneficial reuse, it represents a complex challenge for government and private organizations. This 3‐year field study evaluated the agronomic impacts of reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida on bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge) herbage accumulation and nutritive value. Treatments consisted of a factorial combination of two phosphorus (P) sources (triple superphosphate and biosolids) applied at 0 (control), 20 (low), 40 (intermediate), and 60 kg total P ha−1 (high). Triple superphosphate plots received the same nitrogen (N) load (from ammonium nitrate) as the corresponding biosolids treatments. Bahiagrass herbage accumulation increased with increasing P and associated N rates. Bahiagrass annual herbage accumulation ranged from 2120 kg ha−1 in 2022 to 6970 kg ha−1 in 2020 and was 33%–80% less than previously published data. This was likely due to the reduced biosolids rates that did not supply sufficient N and P to sustain adequate forage production. Lesser herbage accumulation will likely lead to greater application of inorganic fertilizers, which generally have greater environmental footprint than biosolids. Biosolids generally resulted in either similar or greater bahiagrass crude protein, in vitro digestible organic matter, and tissue mineral concentrations than inorganic fertilizer. Similarly, no differences in bahiagrass N and P recovery between biosolids and inorganic fertilizer were observed. This study, along with a significant body of literature, demonstrated that biosolids have considerable fertilizer value and can be an effective alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizer while also providing environmental and economic benefits.
Core Ideas
Biosolids application at P‐based rates decreases forage production and nutritive value.
Reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida will have negative agronomic impacts.
Biosolids are an effective alternative source of N and P to replace inorganic fertilizer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/agj2.21510</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2024-01, Vol.116 (1), p.141-152</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Agronomy Journal © 2023 American Society of Agronomy.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2320-7187a73501976be17486ec564c6a5b430050ee0be49c9dcee604c6aa76aa782e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2166-3156 ; 0000-0001-7944-2749 ; 0000-0002-6051-9635 ; 0000-0002-0024-3673</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vieira‐Filho, Leandro O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohmann, Marta M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollenberger, Lynn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Joao M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Abmael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricken, Ester C.</creatorcontrib><title>Agronomic impacts of new regulations governing land application of Class B biosolids in Florida</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Although land application of biosolids is an attractive option for beneficial reuse, it represents a complex challenge for government and private organizations. This 3‐year field study evaluated the agronomic impacts of reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida on bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge) herbage accumulation and nutritive value. Treatments consisted of a factorial combination of two phosphorus (P) sources (triple superphosphate and biosolids) applied at 0 (control), 20 (low), 40 (intermediate), and 60 kg total P ha−1 (high). Triple superphosphate plots received the same nitrogen (N) load (from ammonium nitrate) as the corresponding biosolids treatments. Bahiagrass herbage accumulation increased with increasing P and associated N rates. Bahiagrass annual herbage accumulation ranged from 2120 kg ha−1 in 2022 to 6970 kg ha−1 in 2020 and was 33%–80% less than previously published data. This was likely due to the reduced biosolids rates that did not supply sufficient N and P to sustain adequate forage production. Lesser herbage accumulation will likely lead to greater application of inorganic fertilizers, which generally have greater environmental footprint than biosolids. Biosolids generally resulted in either similar or greater bahiagrass crude protein, in vitro digestible organic matter, and tissue mineral concentrations than inorganic fertilizer. Similarly, no differences in bahiagrass N and P recovery between biosolids and inorganic fertilizer were observed. This study, along with a significant body of literature, demonstrated that biosolids have considerable fertilizer value and can be an effective alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizer while also providing environmental and economic benefits.
Core Ideas
Biosolids application at P‐based rates decreases forage production and nutritive value.
Reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida will have negative agronomic impacts.
Biosolids are an effective alternative source of N and P to replace inorganic fertilizer.</description><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOAjEQQBujiYhe_IKeTRan3bbLHpEIaEi86LnpdodNSWk3LUr4e1nw7GEyh_dmDo-QRwYTBsCfTbflE84kgysyYqKUBSghr8kITrRgteK35C7nLQBjtWAjomddiiHunKVu1xu7zzRuaMADTdh9e7N3MWTaxR9MwYWOehNaavreO3tmgz33Jmf6QhsXc_SuzdQFuvAxudbck5uN8Rkf_vaYfC1eP-erYv2xfJvP1oXlJYeiYtPKVKUEVleqQVaJqUIrlbDKyEaUABIQoUFR27q1iAoGZKphphzLMXm6_LUp5pxwo_vkdiYdNQM9pNFDGn1Oc5LZRT44j8d_TD1bvvPLzS_RFmZC</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Vieira‐Filho, Leandro O.</creator><creator>Silveira, Maria L.</creator><creator>Kohmann, Marta M.</creator><creator>Sollenberger, Lynn E.</creator><creator>Sanchez, Joao M. D.</creator><creator>Cardoso, Abmael S.</creator><creator>Ricken, Ester C.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-3156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7944-2749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6051-9635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-3673</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Agronomic impacts of new regulations governing land application of Class B biosolids in Florida</title><author>Vieira‐Filho, Leandro O. ; Silveira, Maria L. ; Kohmann, Marta M. ; Sollenberger, Lynn E. ; Sanchez, Joao M. D. ; Cardoso, Abmael S. ; Ricken, Ester C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2320-7187a73501976be17486ec564c6a5b430050ee0be49c9dcee604c6aa76aa782e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vieira‐Filho, Leandro O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, Maria L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kohmann, Marta M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sollenberger, Lynn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, Joao M. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Abmael S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricken, Ester C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vieira‐Filho, Leandro O.</au><au>Silveira, Maria L.</au><au>Kohmann, Marta M.</au><au>Sollenberger, Lynn E.</au><au>Sanchez, Joao M. D.</au><au>Cardoso, Abmael S.</au><au>Ricken, Ester C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agronomic impacts of new regulations governing land application of Class B biosolids in Florida</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>141</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>141-152</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><abstract>Although land application of biosolids is an attractive option for beneficial reuse, it represents a complex challenge for government and private organizations. This 3‐year field study evaluated the agronomic impacts of reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida on bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge) herbage accumulation and nutritive value. Treatments consisted of a factorial combination of two phosphorus (P) sources (triple superphosphate and biosolids) applied at 0 (control), 20 (low), 40 (intermediate), and 60 kg total P ha−1 (high). Triple superphosphate plots received the same nitrogen (N) load (from ammonium nitrate) as the corresponding biosolids treatments. Bahiagrass herbage accumulation increased with increasing P and associated N rates. Bahiagrass annual herbage accumulation ranged from 2120 kg ha−1 in 2022 to 6970 kg ha−1 in 2020 and was 33%–80% less than previously published data. This was likely due to the reduced biosolids rates that did not supply sufficient N and P to sustain adequate forage production. Lesser herbage accumulation will likely lead to greater application of inorganic fertilizers, which generally have greater environmental footprint than biosolids. Biosolids generally resulted in either similar or greater bahiagrass crude protein, in vitro digestible organic matter, and tissue mineral concentrations than inorganic fertilizer. Similarly, no differences in bahiagrass N and P recovery between biosolids and inorganic fertilizer were observed. This study, along with a significant body of literature, demonstrated that biosolids have considerable fertilizer value and can be an effective alternative to commercial inorganic fertilizer while also providing environmental and economic benefits.
Core Ideas
Biosolids application at P‐based rates decreases forage production and nutritive value.
Reduced biosolids rates imposed by new regulations in Florida will have negative agronomic impacts.
Biosolids are an effective alternative source of N and P to replace inorganic fertilizer.</abstract><doi>10.1002/agj2.21510</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2166-3156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7944-2749</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6051-9635</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0024-3673</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2024-01, Vol.116 (1), p.141-152 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_agj2_21510 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
title | Agronomic impacts of new regulations governing land application of Class B biosolids in Florida |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A09%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agronomic%20impacts%20of%20new%20regulations%20governing%20land%20application%20of%20Class%20B%20biosolids%20in%20Florida&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Vieira%E2%80%90Filho,%20Leandro%20O.&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=141&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=141-152&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/agj2.21510&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EAGJ221510%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2320-7187a73501976be17486ec564c6a5b430050ee0be49c9dcee604c6aa76aa782e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |