Loading…
Amine‐containing tertiary phosphine‐substituted diiron ethanedithioate (edt) complexes Fe 2 ( μ ‐edt)(CO) 6‐n L n ( n = 1, 2): Synthesis, protonation, and electrochemical properties
As diiron subsite models of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases for catalytic proton reduction to hydrogen (H 2 ), a new series of the phosphine‐substituted diiron ethanedithiolate complexes Fe 2 ( μ ‐edt)(CO) 6‐n L n ( n = 1, 2) were prepared from the variable substitutions of all‐CO precursor Fe 2 ( μ ‐edt)(CO) 6...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied organometallic chemistry 2020-11, Vol.34 (11) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | As diiron subsite models of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases for catalytic proton reduction to hydrogen (H
2
), a new series of the phosphine‐substituted diiron ethanedithiolate complexes Fe
2
(
μ
‐edt)(CO)
6‐n
L
n
(
n
= 1, 2) were prepared from the variable substitutions of all‐CO precursor Fe
2
(
μ
‐edt)(CO)
6
(
A
) and tertiary phosphines (L1‐L4) under different reaction conditions. While the Me
3
NO‐assisted substitutions of
A
and one equiv. ligands L1‐L4 [L = Ph
2
P(CH
2
NHBu
t
), Ph
2
P(CH
2
CH
2
NH
2
), Ph
2
P(NHBu
t
), and Ph
2
P(C
6
H
4
Me‐
p
)] produced the monosubstituted complexes Fe
2
(
μ
‐edt)(CO)
5
L (
1
–
4
) in good yields, the refluxing xylene solution of
A
and two equiv. ligand L1 prepared complex Fe
2
(
μ
‐edt)(CO)
5
{
κ
1
‐Ph
2
P(CH
2
NHBu
t
)} (
1
) in low yield. Meanwhile, the UV‐irradiated toluene solution of
A
and two equiv. ligand L3 resulted in the rare formation of the disubstituted complex Fe
2
(
μ
‐edt)(CO)
4
{
κ
1
, κ
1
‐(Ph
2
PNHBu
t
)
2
} (
5
) in low yield, whereas the Me
3
NO‐assisted substitution of
A
and two equiv. ligand L4 afforded the disubstituted complex Fe
2
(
μ
‐edt)(CO)
4
{
κ
1
, κ
1
‐(Ph
2
PC
6
H
4
Me‐
p
)
2
} (
6
) in good yield. All the model complexes
1
–
6
have been characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, NMR spectroscopy, and particularly for
1
,
3
,
5
by X‐ray crystallography. Further, the protonations of complexes
1
–
4
are studied and compared with excess acetic acid (HOAc) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) by using FT‐IR and NMR techniques. Additionally, the electrochemical and electrocatalytic properties of model complexes
1
–
6
are investigated and compared by cyclic voltammetry (CV), suggesting that they are electrocatalytically active for proton reduction to H
2
in the presence of HOAc. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0268-2605 1099-0739 |
DOI: | 10.1002/aoc.5929 |