Loading…

Electrooxidation using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anodes as tertiary treatment of oil refinery effluent

In the present work, treatability studies were carried out with oil refinery wastewater (effluent from the secondary treatment) using electrooxidation (EO) process employing two mixed oxide anodes: SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti. Both electrodes' performance were compared by th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Research 2023-10
Main Authors: Treviño‐Reséndez, José, Medel, Alejandro, Cárdenas, Jesús, Meas, Yunny
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c848-1999105252d1fdb93d634adc248ee724c59bc7da9c2e2ba6d16f40cf95231003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c848-1999105252d1fdb93d634adc248ee724c59bc7da9c2e2ba6d16f40cf95231003
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Applied Research
container_volume
creator Treviño‐Reséndez, José
Medel, Alejandro
Cárdenas, Jesús
Meas, Yunny
description In the present work, treatability studies were carried out with oil refinery wastewater (effluent from the secondary treatment) using electrooxidation (EO) process employing two mixed oxide anodes: SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti. Both electrodes' performance were compared by their capacity to generate active chlorine in a synthetic solution and organic matter mineralization of a sample with an average phenol (C 6 H 6 O) concentration of 100 mg L −1 . Before degradation experiments, surface analysis, and linear sweep voltammetry tests were performed. SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode yielded higher active chlorine, reaching an average concentration of 340 mg L −1 at 90 min of electrolysis and 25 mA cm −2 . On the other hand, IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anode only generated an average concentration of 200 mg L −1 at 90 min and 40 mA cm −2 . Regarding the degradation experiments, SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode showed the highest dissolved organic carbon removal, ranging from 26% to 40%. In addition, through a three‐dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence analysis, it was possible to elucidate the degradation of C 6 H 6 O and some possible polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons present in the effluent. The results suggested that 65%–90% of the hydrocarbons and C 6 H 6 O present in the effluent were degraded with the SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode applying 25 mA cm −2 within the first 30 min of electrolysis, reaching almost 99% degradation at 90 min. The EO process using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti can be an alternative for tertiary treatment of oil refinery wastewater for degradation and mineralization of the remaining organic matter of secondary effluents (biological processes) via active chlorine species.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/appl.202300038
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_appl_202300038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_appl_202300038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c848-1999105252d1fdb93d634adc248ee724c59bc7da9c2e2ba6d16f40cf95231003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KQzEQhYMoWGq3rucFbk0m9y9LKVULhYLt_pLmRyK3NyVJQcGF-Aq-oU9iSou4OmfmDMPhI-SW0SmjFO_kft9PkSKnlPL2goywoViU2LaX__w1mcT4mk-wqWktxIh8zXujUvD-zWmZnB_gEN3wAuthBQg_n9_Ph7NZhKP52DiQg4bTlNcbmXUF1Tnx2kSQEZIJycnwDikYmXZmSOAteNdDMNYNJifG2v6QgxtyZWUfzeSsY7J-mG9mT8Vy9biY3S8L1ZZtwYQQjFZYoWZWbwXXNS-lVli2xjRYqkpsVaOlUGhwK2vNaltSZUWFPBPiYzI9fVXBx5hLdPvgdrlhx2h3RNgdEXZ_CPkvlWRlsQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electrooxidation using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anodes as tertiary treatment of oil refinery effluent</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Treviño‐Reséndez, José ; Medel, Alejandro ; Cárdenas, Jesús ; Meas, Yunny</creator><creatorcontrib>Treviño‐Reséndez, José ; Medel, Alejandro ; Cárdenas, Jesús ; Meas, Yunny</creatorcontrib><description>In the present work, treatability studies were carried out with oil refinery wastewater (effluent from the secondary treatment) using electrooxidation (EO) process employing two mixed oxide anodes: SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti. Both electrodes' performance were compared by their capacity to generate active chlorine in a synthetic solution and organic matter mineralization of a sample with an average phenol (C 6 H 6 O) concentration of 100 mg L −1 . Before degradation experiments, surface analysis, and linear sweep voltammetry tests were performed. SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode yielded higher active chlorine, reaching an average concentration of 340 mg L −1 at 90 min of electrolysis and 25 mA cm −2 . On the other hand, IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anode only generated an average concentration of 200 mg L −1 at 90 min and 40 mA cm −2 . Regarding the degradation experiments, SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode showed the highest dissolved organic carbon removal, ranging from 26% to 40%. In addition, through a three‐dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence analysis, it was possible to elucidate the degradation of C 6 H 6 O and some possible polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons present in the effluent. The results suggested that 65%–90% of the hydrocarbons and C 6 H 6 O present in the effluent were degraded with the SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode applying 25 mA cm −2 within the first 30 min of electrolysis, reaching almost 99% degradation at 90 min. The EO process using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti can be an alternative for tertiary treatment of oil refinery wastewater for degradation and mineralization of the remaining organic matter of secondary effluents (biological processes) via active chlorine species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2702-4288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2702-4288</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/appl.202300038</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Applied Research, 2023-10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c848-1999105252d1fdb93d634adc248ee724c59bc7da9c2e2ba6d16f40cf95231003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c848-1999105252d1fdb93d634adc248ee724c59bc7da9c2e2ba6d16f40cf95231003</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8351-2869 ; 0000-0002-1714-4030 ; 0000-0002-7519-209X ; 0000-0002-6494-0769</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Treviño‐Reséndez, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medel, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cárdenas, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meas, Yunny</creatorcontrib><title>Electrooxidation using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anodes as tertiary treatment of oil refinery effluent</title><title>Applied Research</title><description>In the present work, treatability studies were carried out with oil refinery wastewater (effluent from the secondary treatment) using electrooxidation (EO) process employing two mixed oxide anodes: SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti. Both electrodes' performance were compared by their capacity to generate active chlorine in a synthetic solution and organic matter mineralization of a sample with an average phenol (C 6 H 6 O) concentration of 100 mg L −1 . Before degradation experiments, surface analysis, and linear sweep voltammetry tests were performed. SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode yielded higher active chlorine, reaching an average concentration of 340 mg L −1 at 90 min of electrolysis and 25 mA cm −2 . On the other hand, IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anode only generated an average concentration of 200 mg L −1 at 90 min and 40 mA cm −2 . Regarding the degradation experiments, SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode showed the highest dissolved organic carbon removal, ranging from 26% to 40%. In addition, through a three‐dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence analysis, it was possible to elucidate the degradation of C 6 H 6 O and some possible polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons present in the effluent. The results suggested that 65%–90% of the hydrocarbons and C 6 H 6 O present in the effluent were degraded with the SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode applying 25 mA cm −2 within the first 30 min of electrolysis, reaching almost 99% degradation at 90 min. The EO process using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti can be an alternative for tertiary treatment of oil refinery wastewater for degradation and mineralization of the remaining organic matter of secondary effluents (biological processes) via active chlorine species.</description><issn>2702-4288</issn><issn>2702-4288</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkM1KQzEQhYMoWGq3rucFbk0m9y9LKVULhYLt_pLmRyK3NyVJQcGF-Aq-oU9iSou4OmfmDMPhI-SW0SmjFO_kft9PkSKnlPL2goywoViU2LaX__w1mcT4mk-wqWktxIh8zXujUvD-zWmZnB_gEN3wAuthBQg_n9_Ph7NZhKP52DiQg4bTlNcbmXUF1Tnx2kSQEZIJycnwDikYmXZmSOAteNdDMNYNJifG2v6QgxtyZWUfzeSsY7J-mG9mT8Vy9biY3S8L1ZZtwYQQjFZYoWZWbwXXNS-lVli2xjRYqkpsVaOlUGhwK2vNaltSZUWFPBPiYzI9fVXBx5hLdPvgdrlhx2h3RNgdEXZ_CPkvlWRlsQ</recordid><startdate>20231002</startdate><enddate>20231002</enddate><creator>Treviño‐Reséndez, José</creator><creator>Medel, Alejandro</creator><creator>Cárdenas, Jesús</creator><creator>Meas, Yunny</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8351-2869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1714-4030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7519-209X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-0769</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231002</creationdate><title>Electrooxidation using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anodes as tertiary treatment of oil refinery effluent</title><author>Treviño‐Reséndez, José ; Medel, Alejandro ; Cárdenas, Jesús ; Meas, Yunny</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c848-1999105252d1fdb93d634adc248ee724c59bc7da9c2e2ba6d16f40cf95231003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Treviño‐Reséndez, José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medel, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cárdenas, Jesús</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meas, Yunny</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Applied Research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Treviño‐Reséndez, José</au><au>Medel, Alejandro</au><au>Cárdenas, Jesús</au><au>Meas, Yunny</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electrooxidation using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anodes as tertiary treatment of oil refinery effluent</atitle><jtitle>Applied Research</jtitle><date>2023-10-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issn>2702-4288</issn><eissn>2702-4288</eissn><abstract>In the present work, treatability studies were carried out with oil refinery wastewater (effluent from the secondary treatment) using electrooxidation (EO) process employing two mixed oxide anodes: SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti. Both electrodes' performance were compared by their capacity to generate active chlorine in a synthetic solution and organic matter mineralization of a sample with an average phenol (C 6 H 6 O) concentration of 100 mg L −1 . Before degradation experiments, surface analysis, and linear sweep voltammetry tests were performed. SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode yielded higher active chlorine, reaching an average concentration of 340 mg L −1 at 90 min of electrolysis and 25 mA cm −2 . On the other hand, IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anode only generated an average concentration of 200 mg L −1 at 90 min and 40 mA cm −2 . Regarding the degradation experiments, SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode showed the highest dissolved organic carbon removal, ranging from 26% to 40%. In addition, through a three‐dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence analysis, it was possible to elucidate the degradation of C 6 H 6 O and some possible polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons present in the effluent. The results suggested that 65%–90% of the hydrocarbons and C 6 H 6 O present in the effluent were degraded with the SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti anode applying 25 mA cm −2 within the first 30 min of electrolysis, reaching almost 99% degradation at 90 min. The EO process using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti can be an alternative for tertiary treatment of oil refinery wastewater for degradation and mineralization of the remaining organic matter of secondary effluents (biological processes) via active chlorine species.</abstract><doi>10.1002/appl.202300038</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8351-2869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1714-4030</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7519-209X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6494-0769</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2702-4288
ispartof Applied Research, 2023-10
issn 2702-4288
2702-4288
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_appl_202300038
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
title Electrooxidation using SnO 2 –RuO 2 –IrO 2 |Ti and IrO 2 –Ta 2 O 5 |Ti anodes as tertiary treatment of oil refinery effluent
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A14%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electrooxidation%20using%20SnO%202%20%E2%80%93RuO%202%20%E2%80%93IrO%202%20%7CTi%20and%20IrO%202%20%E2%80%93Ta%202%20O%205%20%7CTi%20anodes%20as%20tertiary%20treatment%20of%20oil%20refinery%20effluent&rft.jtitle=Applied%20Research&rft.au=Trevi%C3%B1o%E2%80%90Res%C3%A9ndez,%20Jos%C3%A9&rft.date=2023-10-02&rft.issn=2702-4288&rft.eissn=2702-4288&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/appl.202300038&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_appl_202300038%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c848-1999105252d1fdb93d634adc248ee724c59bc7da9c2e2ba6d16f40cf95231003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true