Loading…

A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D

Knowledge management (KM) is increasingly important to the field of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D). Yet, scant literature has addressed KM in the ICT4D context. This study takes an important step toward addressing this gap by conceptualizing KM in the context of I...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2023-12, Vol.74 (12), p.1384-1400
Main Authors: Thomas, Manoj A., Li, Yan, Sistenich, Vera, Diango, Ken Ngoy, Kabongo, Diulu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d6bb6283b8ab9aa916c334bcdbc76b3e4338196e0c6fc7225c0bb4ca433284e93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d6bb6283b8ab9aa916c334bcdbc76b3e4338196e0c6fc7225c0bb4ca433284e93
container_end_page 1400
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1384
container_title Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
container_volume 74
creator Thomas, Manoj A.
Li, Yan
Sistenich, Vera
Diango, Ken Ngoy
Kabongo, Diulu
description Knowledge management (KM) is increasingly important to the field of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D). Yet, scant literature has addressed KM in the ICT4D context. This study takes an important step toward addressing this gap by conceptualizing KM in the context of ICT4D based on the people‐process‐technology perspective. To elicit KM factors most relevant to ICT4D, a Delphi study is conducted with a panel of experts representing three key stakeholder groups (beneficiaries, partners, and designers) with cumulative experience of leading ICT4D projects in 25 countries. Based on the Delphi study findings, 16 factors relevant to KM in ICT4D are synthesized. A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for KM in ICT4D and an activity checklist are proposed. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing insights into the differing views of stakeholders related to KM practices in ICT4D projects. Practitioners may find the framework and checklist useful in coordinating and managing KM in ICT4D projects. As development initiatives become increasingly knowledge focused, the study calls upon researchers for more enquiry in this progressive area of study.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/asi.24703
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24703</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2886946838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d6bb6283b8ab9aa916c334bcdbc76b3e4338196e0c6fc7225c0bb4ca433284e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGoXvkHAlYupSW6aJstS_woFN3UdksydOu381GRKcecj-Iw-iaNVV_dw-TgHPkIuORtzxsSNS-VYyCmDEzIQACzjSsLpf4bJORmltGGMcWb0RPABWc5ova-68vP9I3Vuiy9tlWOk2KzdGmtsOlpEV-OhjVtatJFum_ZQYb5GWrvmDykbupiv5O0FOStclXD0e4fk-f5uNX_Mlk8Pi_lsmQVhRJflynslNHjtvHHOcBUApA-5D1PlASWA5kYhC6oIUyEmgXkvg-v_Qks0MCRXx95dbF_3mDq7afex6Set0FoZqTTonro-UiG2KUUs7C6WtYtvljP77cv2vuyPL_gCj7Vd8A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2886946838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D</title><source>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</source><source>Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Thomas, Manoj A. ; Li, Yan ; Sistenich, Vera ; Diango, Ken Ngoy ; Kabongo, Diulu</creator><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Manoj A. ; Li, Yan ; Sistenich, Vera ; Diango, Ken Ngoy ; Kabongo, Diulu</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge management (KM) is increasingly important to the field of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D). Yet, scant literature has addressed KM in the ICT4D context. This study takes an important step toward addressing this gap by conceptualizing KM in the context of ICT4D based on the people‐process‐technology perspective. To elicit KM factors most relevant to ICT4D, a Delphi study is conducted with a panel of experts representing three key stakeholder groups (beneficiaries, partners, and designers) with cumulative experience of leading ICT4D projects in 25 countries. Based on the Delphi study findings, 16 factors relevant to KM in ICT4D are synthesized. A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for KM in ICT4D and an activity checklist are proposed. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing insights into the differing views of stakeholders related to KM practices in ICT4D projects. Practitioners may find the framework and checklist useful in coordinating and managing KM in ICT4D projects. As development initiatives become increasingly knowledge focused, the study calls upon researchers for more enquiry in this progressive area of study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2330-1635</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2330-1643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/asi.24703</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Periodicals Inc</publisher><subject>Check Lists ; Context ; Delphi method ; Delphi Technique ; Knowledge management ; Stakeholders</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2023-12, Vol.74 (12), p.1384-1400</ispartof><rights>2022. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d6bb6283b8ab9aa916c334bcdbc76b3e4338196e0c6fc7225c0bb4ca433284e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d6bb6283b8ab9aa916c334bcdbc76b3e4338196e0c6fc7225c0bb4ca433284e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3376-5109 ; 0000-0002-0415-0140</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,34135</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Manoj A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sistenich, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diango, Ken Ngoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabongo, Diulu</creatorcontrib><title>A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D</title><title>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</title><description>Knowledge management (KM) is increasingly important to the field of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D). Yet, scant literature has addressed KM in the ICT4D context. This study takes an important step toward addressing this gap by conceptualizing KM in the context of ICT4D based on the people‐process‐technology perspective. To elicit KM factors most relevant to ICT4D, a Delphi study is conducted with a panel of experts representing three key stakeholder groups (beneficiaries, partners, and designers) with cumulative experience of leading ICT4D projects in 25 countries. Based on the Delphi study findings, 16 factors relevant to KM in ICT4D are synthesized. A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for KM in ICT4D and an activity checklist are proposed. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing insights into the differing views of stakeholders related to KM practices in ICT4D projects. Practitioners may find the framework and checklist useful in coordinating and managing KM in ICT4D projects. As development initiatives become increasingly knowledge focused, the study calls upon researchers for more enquiry in this progressive area of study.</description><subject>Check Lists</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><issn>2330-1635</issn><issn>2330-1643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>F2A</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGoXvkHAlYupSW6aJstS_woFN3UdksydOu381GRKcecj-Iw-iaNVV_dw-TgHPkIuORtzxsSNS-VYyCmDEzIQACzjSsLpf4bJORmltGGMcWb0RPABWc5ova-68vP9I3Vuiy9tlWOk2KzdGmtsOlpEV-OhjVtatJFum_ZQYb5GWrvmDykbupiv5O0FOStclXD0e4fk-f5uNX_Mlk8Pi_lsmQVhRJflynslNHjtvHHOcBUApA-5D1PlASWA5kYhC6oIUyEmgXkvg-v_Qks0MCRXx95dbF_3mDq7afex6Set0FoZqTTonro-UiG2KUUs7C6WtYtvljP77cv2vuyPL_gCj7Vd8A</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Thomas, Manoj A.</creator><creator>Li, Yan</creator><creator>Sistenich, Vera</creator><creator>Diango, Ken Ngoy</creator><creator>Kabongo, Diulu</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3376-5109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-0140</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D</title><author>Thomas, Manoj A. ; Li, Yan ; Sistenich, Vera ; Diango, Ken Ngoy ; Kabongo, Diulu</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d6bb6283b8ab9aa916c334bcdbc76b3e4338196e0c6fc7225c0bb4ca433284e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Check Lists</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thomas, Manoj A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sistenich, Vera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diango, Ken Ngoy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kabongo, Diulu</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thomas, Manoj A.</au><au>Li, Yan</au><au>Sistenich, Vera</au><au>Diango, Ken Ngoy</au><au>Kabongo, Diulu</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology</jtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1384</spage><epage>1400</epage><pages>1384-1400</pages><issn>2330-1635</issn><eissn>2330-1643</eissn><abstract>Knowledge management (KM) is increasingly important to the field of information and communication technologies for development (ICT4D). Yet, scant literature has addressed KM in the ICT4D context. This study takes an important step toward addressing this gap by conceptualizing KM in the context of ICT4D based on the people‐process‐technology perspective. To elicit KM factors most relevant to ICT4D, a Delphi study is conducted with a panel of experts representing three key stakeholder groups (beneficiaries, partners, and designers) with cumulative experience of leading ICT4D projects in 25 countries. Based on the Delphi study findings, 16 factors relevant to KM in ICT4D are synthesized. A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for KM in ICT4D and an activity checklist are proposed. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing insights into the differing views of stakeholders related to KM practices in ICT4D projects. Practitioners may find the framework and checklist useful in coordinating and managing KM in ICT4D projects. As development initiatives become increasingly knowledge focused, the study calls upon researchers for more enquiry in this progressive area of study.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/asi.24703</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3376-5109</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0415-0140</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2330-1635
ispartof Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2023-12, Vol.74 (12), p.1384-1400
issn 2330-1635
2330-1643
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_asi_24703
source Library & Information Science Abstracts (LISA); Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Check Lists
Context
Delphi method
Delphi Technique
Knowledge management
Stakeholders
title A multi‐stakeholder engagement framework for knowledge management in ICT4D
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A18%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multi%E2%80%90stakeholder%20engagement%20framework%20for%20knowledge%20management%20in%20ICT4D&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20for%20Information%20Science%20and%20Technology&rft.au=Thomas,%20Manoj%20A.&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1384&rft.epage=1400&rft.pages=1384-1400&rft.issn=2330-1635&rft.eissn=2330-1643&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/asi.24703&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2886946838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-d6bb6283b8ab9aa916c334bcdbc76b3e4338196e0c6fc7225c0bb4ca433284e93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2886946838&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true