Species Comparison of Postnatal Development of the Female Reproductive System

• Published in: Birth defects research 2018-02, Vol.110 (3), p.163-189
• Main Authors: Laffan, Susan B., Posobiec, Lorraine M., Uhl, Jenny E., Vidal, Justin D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: dog; female reproductive system; ovarian cycle; primates; puberty; rat
• ISSN: 2472-1727; 2472-1727
• DOI: 10.1002/bdr2.1132

The postnatal development of the female reproductive system in laboratory animals and humans is reviewed. To enable a meaningful species comparison of the developing female reproductive system, common definitions of developmental processes were established with a focus made on aspects that are similar across species. A species comparison of the key endocrine, morphologic, and functional (onset of ovarian cycles and ability to reproduce) features of postnatal development of the female reproductive system is provided for human, nonhuman primate, dog, rat, and also mouse, minipig, and rabbit where possible. Species differences in the timing and control of female sexual maturation are highlighted. Additionally, a species comparison of the type and timing of female reproductive ovarian cycles was compiled. Human development provided the frame of reference, and then other common laboratory species were compared. The comparison has inherent challenges because the processes involved and sequence of events can differ greatly across species. Broad strokes were taken to assign a particular average age to an event and are to be used with caution. Methods of evaluation of postnatal female reproductive development in laboratory animals are discussed. Lastly, control rodent data from one of the author's laboratory on vaginal opening, first estrus, estrous cyclicity, and the histopathology involved with the developing female rat and mouse are presented. The information provided in this review is intended to be a resource for the design and interpretation of juvenile animal toxicity testing and ultimately, the relevance of the data to characterize potential risks for women and girls. Birth Defects Research 110:163–189, 2018. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.