Loading…

Exploring Cage‐warped Rotation Isomers of C 20 Fullerene: MP2 and Density Functional Calculations

Using the density functional methods B3LYP, M06‐2X, PBE1PBE, B3LYP D3, M06‐2X D3, and PBE1PBE D3, and the ab initio MP2 calculations, the optimized atomic structures and energies of C 20 cage rotation isomers without a constraint were obtained. The reaction path between the two rotational isomers wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society 2020-02, Vol.41 (2), p.196-200
Main Authors: Lee, Jangwon, Cho, Yongjae, Jang, MinJeong, Kook, GaYoung, Gho, HeeSu, Lee, Changhoon, Hoang, Geun C., Lee, Kee Hag
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Using the density functional methods B3LYP, M06‐2X, PBE1PBE, B3LYP D3, M06‐2X D3, and PBE1PBE D3, and the ab initio MP2 calculations, the optimized atomic structures and energies of C 20 cage rotation isomers without a constraint were obtained. The reaction path between the two rotational isomers was then studied, in which there are three local stable atomic structures. One is the most stable fullerene structure with the D 2h point group staggered between the upper and bottom pentagons ( ST ) and the other is the second lowest energy rotational isomer with the Cs point group eclipsed between the upper and bottom pentagons ( EC ) with a torn fullerene structure ( M1 ) between ST and EC . The first transition structure T1 between the ST and the M1 , and the second transition structure T2 between the M1 and the EC were then obtained along the reaction coordinate between these three structures. Vibration analysis of all optimized structures including the transition structures without a constraint was carried out. For each of the rotational isomers obtained by our calculations, thermodynamic stability was explained with the relative energy difference, and then the kinetic stability was analyzed as the HOMO–LUMO energy difference.
ISSN:1229-5949
1229-5949
DOI:10.1002/bkcs.11957