Loading…

Comparative study of different steel‐concrete composite shear walls

High‐rise buildings are typically subjected to horizontal loads as wind and earthquake, therefore, to provide an adequate lateral stiffness and resistance, structural cores should be considered within the structure. For this reason, to provide alternative yet advantageous solutions, a comparison bet...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ce/papers 2023-09, Vol.6 (3-4), p.200-206
Main Authors: Anwaar, Omer, Pepe, Davide, Zanon, Riccardo
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-5f864a6d077bf425741adf448093765d44b262ca59b225e10e2ef77f74b0aad63
container_end_page 206
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 200
container_title ce/papers
container_volume 6
creator Anwaar, Omer
Pepe, Davide
Zanon, Riccardo
description High‐rise buildings are typically subjected to horizontal loads as wind and earthquake, therefore, to provide an adequate lateral stiffness and resistance, structural cores should be considered within the structure. For this reason, to provide alternative yet advantageous solutions, a comparison between concrete cores and composite cores for high‐rise buildings' performances is presented here. Some recent applications in US and China, indeed, showed how the steel‐concrete composite shear wall solution could give better results in terms of construction time and constructability ensuring a significant financial gain. Different ideas of composite shear walls will be presented and parameters of stiffness and resistance for each cross section will be evaluated. Thereafter, the best solutions, in terms of the abovementioned parameters and constructability, will be implemented into a real case of a building, modelled on ETABS software and compared with the original solution in reinforced concrete. In addition to highlighting the structural benefits of the proposed solution, it will be shown that the proposed solution has lower carbon footprint compared to other conventional solutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cepa.2579
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cepa_2579</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CEPA2579</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-5f864a6d077bf425741adf448093765d44b262ca59b225e10e2ef77f74b0aad63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EElXpwBtkZUh7duw4GauoQKVKMHS3Ls5ZBKVNZAeqbDwCz8iTkFAGFqb7dfr-0-lj7JbDkgOIlaUOl0Lp_ILNhII81qDV5Z98zRYhvAJAIjjPhJixTdEeOvTY1-8Uhf6tGqLWRVXtHHk69uOKqPn6-LTt0XrqKbIj34Z6TOGF0EcnbJpww64cNoEWv3PO9vebffEY754etsV6F1st81i5LJWYVqB16eT4p-RYOSkzyBOdqkrKUqTCospLIRRxIEFOa6dlCYhVmszZ3fms9W0InpzpfH1APxgOZjJgJgNmMjCyqzN7qhsa_gdNsXle_zS-AQnDXsg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of different steel‐concrete composite shear walls</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Anwaar, Omer ; Pepe, Davide ; Zanon, Riccardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Anwaar, Omer ; Pepe, Davide ; Zanon, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><description>High‐rise buildings are typically subjected to horizontal loads as wind and earthquake, therefore, to provide an adequate lateral stiffness and resistance, structural cores should be considered within the structure. For this reason, to provide alternative yet advantageous solutions, a comparison between concrete cores and composite cores for high‐rise buildings' performances is presented here. Some recent applications in US and China, indeed, showed how the steel‐concrete composite shear wall solution could give better results in terms of construction time and constructability ensuring a significant financial gain. Different ideas of composite shear walls will be presented and parameters of stiffness and resistance for each cross section will be evaluated. Thereafter, the best solutions, in terms of the abovementioned parameters and constructability, will be implemented into a real case of a building, modelled on ETABS software and compared with the original solution in reinforced concrete. In addition to highlighting the structural benefits of the proposed solution, it will be shown that the proposed solution has lower carbon footprint compared to other conventional solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2509-7075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2509-7075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cepa.2579</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Composite shear wall ; SkyCore tower ; SpeedCore tower</subject><ispartof>ce/papers, 2023-09, Vol.6 (3-4), p.200-206</ispartof><rights>2023 Ernst &amp; Sohn GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-5f864a6d077bf425741adf448093765d44b262ca59b225e10e2ef77f74b0aad63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anwaar, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepe, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanon, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of different steel‐concrete composite shear walls</title><title>ce/papers</title><description>High‐rise buildings are typically subjected to horizontal loads as wind and earthquake, therefore, to provide an adequate lateral stiffness and resistance, structural cores should be considered within the structure. For this reason, to provide alternative yet advantageous solutions, a comparison between concrete cores and composite cores for high‐rise buildings' performances is presented here. Some recent applications in US and China, indeed, showed how the steel‐concrete composite shear wall solution could give better results in terms of construction time and constructability ensuring a significant financial gain. Different ideas of composite shear walls will be presented and parameters of stiffness and resistance for each cross section will be evaluated. Thereafter, the best solutions, in terms of the abovementioned parameters and constructability, will be implemented into a real case of a building, modelled on ETABS software and compared with the original solution in reinforced concrete. In addition to highlighting the structural benefits of the proposed solution, it will be shown that the proposed solution has lower carbon footprint compared to other conventional solutions.</description><subject>Composite shear wall</subject><subject>SkyCore tower</subject><subject>SpeedCore tower</subject><issn>2509-7075</issn><issn>2509-7075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLFOwzAQhi0EElXpwBtkZUh7duw4GauoQKVKMHS3Ls5ZBKVNZAeqbDwCz8iTkFAGFqb7dfr-0-lj7JbDkgOIlaUOl0Lp_ILNhII81qDV5Z98zRYhvAJAIjjPhJixTdEeOvTY1-8Uhf6tGqLWRVXtHHk69uOKqPn6-LTt0XrqKbIj34Z6TOGF0EcnbJpww64cNoEWv3PO9vebffEY754etsV6F1st81i5LJWYVqB16eT4p-RYOSkzyBOdqkrKUqTCospLIRRxIEFOa6dlCYhVmszZ3fms9W0InpzpfH1APxgOZjJgJgNmMjCyqzN7qhsa_gdNsXle_zS-AQnDXsg</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Anwaar, Omer</creator><creator>Pepe, Davide</creator><creator>Zanon, Riccardo</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Comparative study of different steel‐concrete composite shear walls</title><author>Anwaar, Omer ; Pepe, Davide ; Zanon, Riccardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-5f864a6d077bf425741adf448093765d44b262ca59b225e10e2ef77f74b0aad63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Composite shear wall</topic><topic>SkyCore tower</topic><topic>SpeedCore tower</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anwaar, Omer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepe, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanon, Riccardo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ce/papers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anwaar, Omer</au><au>Pepe, Davide</au><au>Zanon, Riccardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of different steel‐concrete composite shear walls</atitle><jtitle>ce/papers</jtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>200</spage><epage>206</epage><pages>200-206</pages><issn>2509-7075</issn><eissn>2509-7075</eissn><abstract>High‐rise buildings are typically subjected to horizontal loads as wind and earthquake, therefore, to provide an adequate lateral stiffness and resistance, structural cores should be considered within the structure. For this reason, to provide alternative yet advantageous solutions, a comparison between concrete cores and composite cores for high‐rise buildings' performances is presented here. Some recent applications in US and China, indeed, showed how the steel‐concrete composite shear wall solution could give better results in terms of construction time and constructability ensuring a significant financial gain. Different ideas of composite shear walls will be presented and parameters of stiffness and resistance for each cross section will be evaluated. Thereafter, the best solutions, in terms of the abovementioned parameters and constructability, will be implemented into a real case of a building, modelled on ETABS software and compared with the original solution in reinforced concrete. In addition to highlighting the structural benefits of the proposed solution, it will be shown that the proposed solution has lower carbon footprint compared to other conventional solutions.</abstract><doi>10.1002/cepa.2579</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2509-7075
ispartof ce/papers, 2023-09, Vol.6 (3-4), p.200-206
issn 2509-7075
2509-7075
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cepa_2579
source Wiley
subjects Composite shear wall
SkyCore tower
SpeedCore tower
title Comparative study of different steel‐concrete composite shear walls
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A00%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20different%20steel%E2%80%90concrete%20composite%20shear%20walls&rft.jtitle=ce/papers&rft.au=Anwaar,%20Omer&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=206&rft.pages=200-206&rft.issn=2509-7075&rft.eissn=2509-7075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cepa.2579&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECEPA2579%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c749-5f864a6d077bf425741adf448093765d44b262ca59b225e10e2ef77f74b0aad63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true