Loading…

A review on the current state of urine cytology emphasizing the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to diagnosis

Urinary cytology has a significant role in the detection and surveillance of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC), which has a high morbidity rate in the United States. Examination of the urine is a comprehensive screen of both the upper and lower urinary tract and is ideal for detecting both pri...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cancer cytopathology 2010-08, Vol.118 (4), p.175-183
Main Authors: Caraway, Nancy P., Katz, Ruth L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3640-c9fe4f8f7343abdb89cb922c7ab4aa7618b8a4183dbced7d7961d2906ff09e723
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3640-c9fe4f8f7343abdb89cb922c7ab4aa7618b8a4183dbced7d7961d2906ff09e723
container_end_page 183
container_issue 4
container_start_page 175
container_title Cancer cytopathology
container_volume 118
creator Caraway, Nancy P.
Katz, Ruth L.
description Urinary cytology has a significant role in the detection and surveillance of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC), which has a high morbidity rate in the United States. Examination of the urine is a comprehensive screen of both the upper and lower urinary tract and is ideal for detecting both primary bladder UC and synchronous or metachronous, multifocal UCs that commonly occur because of a “field effect.” This field effect is the result of both clonal and random genetic abnormalities that have resulted from exposure to carcinogens (most frequently in tobacco smoke) in conjunction with the individual's ability to repair DNA damage. Although urinary cytology has high specificity for the detection of UC, its sensitivity is relatively low, especially for more prevalent low‐grade tumors. Consequently, several urine‐based tests have been investigated, some of which are available commercially and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, these tests also have their limitations and often have lower specificity than urinary cytology. Consequently, urinary cytology, which is a noninvasive, cost‐effective test, continues in mainstream use because of its ability to detect high‐grade, flat lesions that can be difficult to detect clinically and that often have more aggressive biologic behavior. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. For this report, the authors summarized how urinary specimens are used in the surveillance of patients with bladder cancer. The review highlights advantages and limitations of US Food and Drug Administration‐approved tests in these patients with an emphasis on the multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization test.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncy.20080
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncy_20080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCY20080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3640-c9fe4f8f7343abdb89cb922c7ab4aa7618b8a4183dbced7d7961d2906ff09e723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYgIMobk4v_gDJWehM0tKmx1H8gqEXBT2VfG4ZXTKS1NHd_d92q-7oJW94ed7n8ABwjdEUI0TuhBXdlCBE0QkY4zLNkjxP6enxTz5G4CKEFUKYFgSfgxFBRdqfZmPwPYNefRm1hc7CuFRQtN4rG2GILCroNGy9sf26i65xiw6q9WbJgtkZuzjw3jUHTDet8yoIZYWCxsJgYguXHfdGmh2LptezAFn_ylVrRYTRQWnYwrpgwiU406wJ6up3TsD7w_1b9ZTMXx-fq9k8EWmeoUSUWmWa6iLNUsYlp6XgJSGiYDxjrMgx5ZRlmKaSCyULWZQ5lqREudaoVAVJJ-B28ArvQvBK1xtv1sx3NUb1vmW9b1kfWvbwzQBvWr5W8oj-xesBPABb06juH1VdvVSfg_QHoR2CjA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A review on the current state of urine cytology emphasizing the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to diagnosis</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Caraway, Nancy P. ; Katz, Ruth L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Caraway, Nancy P. ; Katz, Ruth L.</creatorcontrib><description>Urinary cytology has a significant role in the detection and surveillance of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC), which has a high morbidity rate in the United States. Examination of the urine is a comprehensive screen of both the upper and lower urinary tract and is ideal for detecting both primary bladder UC and synchronous or metachronous, multifocal UCs that commonly occur because of a “field effect.” This field effect is the result of both clonal and random genetic abnormalities that have resulted from exposure to carcinogens (most frequently in tobacco smoke) in conjunction with the individual's ability to repair DNA damage. Although urinary cytology has high specificity for the detection of UC, its sensitivity is relatively low, especially for more prevalent low‐grade tumors. Consequently, several urine‐based tests have been investigated, some of which are available commercially and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, these tests also have their limitations and often have lower specificity than urinary cytology. Consequently, urinary cytology, which is a noninvasive, cost‐effective test, continues in mainstream use because of its ability to detect high‐grade, flat lesions that can be difficult to detect clinically and that often have more aggressive biologic behavior. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. For this report, the authors summarized how urinary specimens are used in the surveillance of patients with bladder cancer. The review highlights advantages and limitations of US Food and Drug Administration‐approved tests in these patients with an emphasis on the multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization test.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-662X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-6638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncy.20080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20731004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>biomarkers ; Biomarkers, Tumor - urine ; bladder tumor antigen ; Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine ; Cytodiagnosis - methods ; fluorescence in situ hybridization ; Humans ; ImmunoCyt/uCyt ; In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence ; nuclear matrix protein 22 ; review ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine ; urinary cytology ; urothelial carcinoma</subject><ispartof>Cancer cytopathology, 2010-08, Vol.118 (4), p.175-183</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>(c) 2010 American Cancer Society.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3640-c9fe4f8f7343abdb89cb922c7ab4aa7618b8a4183dbced7d7961d2906ff09e723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3640-c9fe4f8f7343abdb89cb922c7ab4aa7618b8a4183dbced7d7961d2906ff09e723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20731004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caraway, Nancy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Ruth L.</creatorcontrib><title>A review on the current state of urine cytology emphasizing the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to diagnosis</title><title>Cancer cytopathology</title><addtitle>Cancer Cytopathol</addtitle><description>Urinary cytology has a significant role in the detection and surveillance of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC), which has a high morbidity rate in the United States. Examination of the urine is a comprehensive screen of both the upper and lower urinary tract and is ideal for detecting both primary bladder UC and synchronous or metachronous, multifocal UCs that commonly occur because of a “field effect.” This field effect is the result of both clonal and random genetic abnormalities that have resulted from exposure to carcinogens (most frequently in tobacco smoke) in conjunction with the individual's ability to repair DNA damage. Although urinary cytology has high specificity for the detection of UC, its sensitivity is relatively low, especially for more prevalent low‐grade tumors. Consequently, several urine‐based tests have been investigated, some of which are available commercially and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, these tests also have their limitations and often have lower specificity than urinary cytology. Consequently, urinary cytology, which is a noninvasive, cost‐effective test, continues in mainstream use because of its ability to detect high‐grade, flat lesions that can be difficult to detect clinically and that often have more aggressive biologic behavior. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. For this report, the authors summarized how urinary specimens are used in the surveillance of patients with bladder cancer. The review highlights advantages and limitations of US Food and Drug Administration‐approved tests in these patients with an emphasis on the multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization test.</description><subject>biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - urine</subject><subject>bladder tumor antigen</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine</subject><subject>Cytodiagnosis - methods</subject><subject>fluorescence in situ hybridization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ImmunoCyt/uCyt</subject><subject>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</subject><subject>nuclear matrix protein 22</subject><subject>review</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine</subject><subject>urinary cytology</subject><subject>urothelial carcinoma</subject><issn>1934-662X</issn><issn>1934-6638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LwzAYgIMobk4v_gDJWehM0tKmx1H8gqEXBT2VfG4ZXTKS1NHd_d92q-7oJW94ed7n8ABwjdEUI0TuhBXdlCBE0QkY4zLNkjxP6enxTz5G4CKEFUKYFgSfgxFBRdqfZmPwPYNefRm1hc7CuFRQtN4rG2GILCroNGy9sf26i65xiw6q9WbJgtkZuzjw3jUHTDet8yoIZYWCxsJgYguXHfdGmh2LptezAFn_ylVrRYTRQWnYwrpgwiU406wJ6up3TsD7w_1b9ZTMXx-fq9k8EWmeoUSUWmWa6iLNUsYlp6XgJSGiYDxjrMgx5ZRlmKaSCyULWZQ5lqREudaoVAVJJ-B28ArvQvBK1xtv1sx3NUb1vmW9b1kfWvbwzQBvWr5W8oj-xesBPABb06juH1VdvVSfg_QHoR2CjA</recordid><startdate>20100825</startdate><enddate>20100825</enddate><creator>Caraway, Nancy P.</creator><creator>Katz, Ruth L.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100825</creationdate><title>A review on the current state of urine cytology emphasizing the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to diagnosis</title><author>Caraway, Nancy P. ; Katz, Ruth L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3640-c9fe4f8f7343abdb89cb922c7ab4aa7618b8a4183dbced7d7961d2906ff09e723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - urine</topic><topic>bladder tumor antigen</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine</topic><topic>Cytodiagnosis - methods</topic><topic>fluorescence in situ hybridization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ImmunoCyt/uCyt</topic><topic>In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence</topic><topic>nuclear matrix protein 22</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine</topic><topic>urinary cytology</topic><topic>urothelial carcinoma</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caraway, Nancy P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katz, Ruth L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Cancer cytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caraway, Nancy P.</au><au>Katz, Ruth L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A review on the current state of urine cytology emphasizing the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to diagnosis</atitle><jtitle>Cancer cytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2010-08-25</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>175</spage><epage>183</epage><pages>175-183</pages><issn>1934-662X</issn><eissn>1934-6638</eissn><abstract>Urinary cytology has a significant role in the detection and surveillance of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC), which has a high morbidity rate in the United States. Examination of the urine is a comprehensive screen of both the upper and lower urinary tract and is ideal for detecting both primary bladder UC and synchronous or metachronous, multifocal UCs that commonly occur because of a “field effect.” This field effect is the result of both clonal and random genetic abnormalities that have resulted from exposure to carcinogens (most frequently in tobacco smoke) in conjunction with the individual's ability to repair DNA damage. Although urinary cytology has high specificity for the detection of UC, its sensitivity is relatively low, especially for more prevalent low‐grade tumors. Consequently, several urine‐based tests have been investigated, some of which are available commercially and approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. However, these tests also have their limitations and often have lower specificity than urinary cytology. Consequently, urinary cytology, which is a noninvasive, cost‐effective test, continues in mainstream use because of its ability to detect high‐grade, flat lesions that can be difficult to detect clinically and that often have more aggressive biologic behavior. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. For this report, the authors summarized how urinary specimens are used in the surveillance of patients with bladder cancer. The review highlights advantages and limitations of US Food and Drug Administration‐approved tests in these patients with an emphasis on the multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization test.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>20731004</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncy.20080</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-662X
ispartof Cancer cytopathology, 2010-08, Vol.118 (4), p.175-183
issn 1934-662X
1934-6638
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_cncy_20080
source Wiley
subjects biomarkers
Biomarkers, Tumor - urine
bladder tumor antigen
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell - urine
Cytodiagnosis - methods
fluorescence in situ hybridization
Humans
ImmunoCyt/uCyt
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
nuclear matrix protein 22
review
Sensitivity and Specificity
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms - urine
urinary cytology
urothelial carcinoma
title A review on the current state of urine cytology emphasizing the role of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an adjunct to diagnosis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20review%20on%20the%20current%20state%20of%20urine%20cytology%20emphasizing%20the%20role%20of%20fluorescence%20in%20situ%20hybridization%20as%20an%20adjunct%20to%20diagnosis&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20cytopathology&rft.au=Caraway,%20Nancy%20P.&rft.date=2010-08-25&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=175&rft.epage=183&rft.pages=175-183&rft.issn=1934-662X&rft.eissn=1934-6638&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncy.20080&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECNCY20080%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3640-c9fe4f8f7343abdb89cb922c7ab4aa7618b8a4183dbced7d7961d2906ff09e723%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/20731004&rfr_iscdi=true