Loading…
Perennial cereal rye performance and comparisons with winter annual cereal forages in the semiarid, subtropical southwestern United States
The demand for forage for livestock production is increasing in semiarid regions. Winter annual cereal forages are commonly used to fill autumn through spring forage gaps where dry winters occur. Perennial cereal rye (Secale cereale L. × S. montanum Guss., P‐CR) shows promise for forage in other are...
Saved in:
Published in: | Crop science 2020-01, Vol.60 (1), p.507-514 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3099-2fb91122d61071b29328599e69b4fb98b5c4fd301069e4f7c87734d4050063d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3099-2fb91122d61071b29328599e69b4fb98b5c4fd301069e4f7c87734d4050063d3 |
container_end_page | 514 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 507 |
container_title | Crop science |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Marsalis, Mark A. Lauriault, Leonard M. Darapuneni, Murali K. |
description | The demand for forage for livestock production is increasing in semiarid regions. Winter annual cereal forages are commonly used to fill autumn through spring forage gaps where dry winters occur. Perennial cereal rye (Secale cereale L. × S. montanum Guss., P‐CR) shows promise for forage in other areas. Randomized complete block studies were conducted during the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 autumn through spring growing seasons at two locations in the semiarid, subtropical US Southwest for a total of six site‐years (Los Lunas [two irrigation regimes] and Tucumcari, NM) to evaluate local adaptation and possible perennation of P‐CR as an alternative to winter annual cereal forages. Poor establishment of P‐CR occurred in the 2013–2014 season and prevented data collection; however, the P‐CR variety tested did not perennate in any of these site‐years in the southwestern United States. Generally, across site‐years, as annual cereal forages harvested at boot stage, P‐CR and triticale [× Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus (Secale × Triticum)] had equal and greater dry matter yields than annual cereal rye (S. cereale, A‐CR) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., WW) (11.89, 7.43, 11.32, and 9.66 Mg ha−1 for P‐CR, A‐CR, triticale, and WW, respectively; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/csc2.20069 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20069</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CSC220069</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3099-2fb91122d61071b29328599e69b4fb98b5c4fd301069e4f7c87734d4050063d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HO4tZJsl85yqJVKCi0grclm521kW52SVJK_4K_2tQK3rzMDLzvM4eHkGsGMwbA77TXfMYBcnlCJiwVWQJ5Jk7JBICxhJXi_ZxceP8JAIUssgn5ekWH1hq1oTpecbk90hFdN7heWY1U2ZbqoR-VM36wnu5MWMdhA7qY2e0fGRH1gZ4aS8MaqcfeRKi9pX7bBDeMRseSH7ZhvUMfcUvfrAnY0mVQAf0lOevUxuPV756S1ePDqnpKFi_z5-p-kWgBUia8ayRjnLc5g4I1XApeZlJiLps0RmWT6bRrBbAoAdOu0GVRiLRNIYtaRCum5Ob4VrvBe4ddPTrTK7evGdQHifVBYv0jMZbZsbwzG9z_06yrZcWPzDcsMXaR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perennial cereal rye performance and comparisons with winter annual cereal forages in the semiarid, subtropical southwestern United States</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Marsalis, Mark A. ; Lauriault, Leonard M. ; Darapuneni, Murali K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marsalis, Mark A. ; Lauriault, Leonard M. ; Darapuneni, Murali K.</creatorcontrib><description>The demand for forage for livestock production is increasing in semiarid regions. Winter annual cereal forages are commonly used to fill autumn through spring forage gaps where dry winters occur. Perennial cereal rye (Secale cereale L. × S. montanum Guss., P‐CR) shows promise for forage in other areas. Randomized complete block studies were conducted during the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 autumn through spring growing seasons at two locations in the semiarid, subtropical US Southwest for a total of six site‐years (Los Lunas [two irrigation regimes] and Tucumcari, NM) to evaluate local adaptation and possible perennation of P‐CR as an alternative to winter annual cereal forages. Poor establishment of P‐CR occurred in the 2013–2014 season and prevented data collection; however, the P‐CR variety tested did not perennate in any of these site‐years in the southwestern United States. Generally, across site‐years, as annual cereal forages harvested at boot stage, P‐CR and triticale [× Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus (Secale × Triticum)] had equal and greater dry matter yields than annual cereal rye (S. cereale, A‐CR) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., WW) (11.89, 7.43, 11.32, and 9.66 Mg ha−1 for P‐CR, A‐CR, triticale, and WW, respectively; P < 0.0001, SEM = 0.36). Additionally, across environments, fiber components (acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent lignin) were generally higher, and crude protein and 48‐h neutral detergent fiber digestibility were generally lesser for P‐CR than for the annual species (110, 180, 144, and 133 g crude protein kg−1 for P‐CR, A‐CR, triticale, and WW, respectively; P < 0.0001, SEM = 6). Currently used annual species (cereal rye, triticale, or wheat) continue to be recommended.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0011-183X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0653</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20069</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Crop science, 2020-01, Vol.60 (1), p.507-514</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Crop Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3099-2fb91122d61071b29328599e69b4fb98b5c4fd301069e4f7c87734d4050063d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3099-2fb91122d61071b29328599e69b4fb98b5c4fd301069e4f7c87734d4050063d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6710-1207 ; 0000-0002-7663-3117 ; 0000-0001-8007-5464</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marsalis, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauriault, Leonard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darapuneni, Murali K.</creatorcontrib><title>Perennial cereal rye performance and comparisons with winter annual cereal forages in the semiarid, subtropical southwestern United States</title><title>Crop science</title><description>The demand for forage for livestock production is increasing in semiarid regions. Winter annual cereal forages are commonly used to fill autumn through spring forage gaps where dry winters occur. Perennial cereal rye (Secale cereale L. × S. montanum Guss., P‐CR) shows promise for forage in other areas. Randomized complete block studies were conducted during the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 autumn through spring growing seasons at two locations in the semiarid, subtropical US Southwest for a total of six site‐years (Los Lunas [two irrigation regimes] and Tucumcari, NM) to evaluate local adaptation and possible perennation of P‐CR as an alternative to winter annual cereal forages. Poor establishment of P‐CR occurred in the 2013–2014 season and prevented data collection; however, the P‐CR variety tested did not perennate in any of these site‐years in the southwestern United States. Generally, across site‐years, as annual cereal forages harvested at boot stage, P‐CR and triticale [× Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus (Secale × Triticum)] had equal and greater dry matter yields than annual cereal rye (S. cereale, A‐CR) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., WW) (11.89, 7.43, 11.32, and 9.66 Mg ha−1 for P‐CR, A‐CR, triticale, and WW, respectively; P < 0.0001, SEM = 0.36). Additionally, across environments, fiber components (acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent lignin) were generally higher, and crude protein and 48‐h neutral detergent fiber digestibility were generally lesser for P‐CR than for the annual species (110, 180, 144, and 133 g crude protein kg−1 for P‐CR, A‐CR, triticale, and WW, respectively; P < 0.0001, SEM = 6). Currently used annual species (cereal rye, triticale, or wheat) continue to be recommended.</description><issn>0011-183X</issn><issn>1435-0653</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0HO4tZJsl85yqJVKCi0grclm521kW52SVJK_4K_2tQK3rzMDLzvM4eHkGsGMwbA77TXfMYBcnlCJiwVWQJ5Jk7JBICxhJXi_ZxceP8JAIUssgn5ekWH1hq1oTpecbk90hFdN7heWY1U2ZbqoR-VM36wnu5MWMdhA7qY2e0fGRH1gZ4aS8MaqcfeRKi9pX7bBDeMRseSH7ZhvUMfcUvfrAnY0mVQAf0lOevUxuPV756S1ePDqnpKFi_z5-p-kWgBUia8ayRjnLc5g4I1XApeZlJiLps0RmWT6bRrBbAoAdOu0GVRiLRNIYtaRCum5Ob4VrvBe4ddPTrTK7evGdQHifVBYv0jMZbZsbwzG9z_06yrZcWPzDcsMXaR</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Marsalis, Mark A.</creator><creator>Lauriault, Leonard M.</creator><creator>Darapuneni, Murali K.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6710-1207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-3117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-5464</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Perennial cereal rye performance and comparisons with winter annual cereal forages in the semiarid, subtropical southwestern United States</title><author>Marsalis, Mark A. ; Lauriault, Leonard M. ; Darapuneni, Murali K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3099-2fb91122d61071b29328599e69b4fb98b5c4fd301069e4f7c87734d4050063d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marsalis, Mark A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lauriault, Leonard M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Darapuneni, Murali K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marsalis, Mark A.</au><au>Lauriault, Leonard M.</au><au>Darapuneni, Murali K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perennial cereal rye performance and comparisons with winter annual cereal forages in the semiarid, subtropical southwestern United States</atitle><jtitle>Crop science</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>507</spage><epage>514</epage><pages>507-514</pages><issn>0011-183X</issn><eissn>1435-0653</eissn><abstract>The demand for forage for livestock production is increasing in semiarid regions. Winter annual cereal forages are commonly used to fill autumn through spring forage gaps where dry winters occur. Perennial cereal rye (Secale cereale L. × S. montanum Guss., P‐CR) shows promise for forage in other areas. Randomized complete block studies were conducted during the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 autumn through spring growing seasons at two locations in the semiarid, subtropical US Southwest for a total of six site‐years (Los Lunas [two irrigation regimes] and Tucumcari, NM) to evaluate local adaptation and possible perennation of P‐CR as an alternative to winter annual cereal forages. Poor establishment of P‐CR occurred in the 2013–2014 season and prevented data collection; however, the P‐CR variety tested did not perennate in any of these site‐years in the southwestern United States. Generally, across site‐years, as annual cereal forages harvested at boot stage, P‐CR and triticale [× Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus (Secale × Triticum)] had equal and greater dry matter yields than annual cereal rye (S. cereale, A‐CR) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., WW) (11.89, 7.43, 11.32, and 9.66 Mg ha−1 for P‐CR, A‐CR, triticale, and WW, respectively; P < 0.0001, SEM = 0.36). Additionally, across environments, fiber components (acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and acid detergent lignin) were generally higher, and crude protein and 48‐h neutral detergent fiber digestibility were generally lesser for P‐CR than for the annual species (110, 180, 144, and 133 g crude protein kg−1 for P‐CR, A‐CR, triticale, and WW, respectively; P < 0.0001, SEM = 6). Currently used annual species (cereal rye, triticale, or wheat) continue to be recommended.</abstract><doi>10.1002/csc2.20069</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6710-1207</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7663-3117</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-5464</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0011-183X |
ispartof | Crop science, 2020-01, Vol.60 (1), p.507-514 |
issn | 0011-183X 1435-0653 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_csc2_20069 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
title | Perennial cereal rye performance and comparisons with winter annual cereal forages in the semiarid, subtropical southwestern United States |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A21%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perennial%20cereal%20rye%20performance%20and%20comparisons%20with%20winter%20annual%20cereal%20forages%20in%20the%20semiarid,%20subtropical%20southwestern%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Crop%20science&rft.au=Marsalis,%20Mark%20A.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=507&rft.epage=514&rft.pages=507-514&rft.issn=0011-183X&rft.eissn=1435-0653&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/csc2.20069&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3ECSC220069%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3099-2fb91122d61071b29328599e69b4fb98b5c4fd301069e4f7c87734d4050063d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |