Loading…
State‐based curriculum making in Turkey: Curriculum modernization initiative and the latest science curriculum
Turkey's politically induced ‘curricular modernization initiative’ intended a philosophical change and a system‐level transformation from behaviouristic to constructivist‐inspired pedagogies in the early 2000s. Science curriculum has been one of the curricula that has taken precedence. It has c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Curriculum journal (London, England) England), 2023-06, Vol.34 (2), p.298-314 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2482-dd445bf6629eaddb326011beca2cc06392648aa582f9744a9ac7ab7ec1e3381a3 |
container_end_page | 314 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 298 |
container_title | Curriculum journal (London, England) |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Ozturk‐Akar, Ebru |
description | Turkey's politically induced ‘curricular modernization initiative’ intended a philosophical change and a system‐level transformation from behaviouristic to constructivist‐inspired pedagogies in the early 2000s. Science curriculum has been one of the curricula that has taken precedence. It has changed four times since then. The latest science curriculum for grades 3–8 – age group 9–13 – is issued in 2018. This study examines these curricula and discusses curriculum making at the macro site. Whether or to what extent the tools of state‐based curriculum making (ToSBCM) are used is also investigated. Directed content analysis and thematic analysis are used to address the research questions. Findings revealed that Turkey's latest science curriculum is a reformulation of its predecessors' goals, learning outcomes and content. ToSBCM are effectively used in introducing the new emphases of curriculum, managing discourse communities and granting the executive responsibility to teachers. Considering Turkey's curricular experiences as a country which has one of the most centralized education systems among OECD countries, and a very large hierarchical national administration with schools having the lowest levels of autonomy in determining curriculum and assessment policies among countries participating in PISA, findings offer opportunities to compare and discuss processes of curriculum making with an international perspective. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/curj.192 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_curj_192</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1372755</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1372755</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2482-dd445bf6629eaddb326011beca2cc06392648aa582f9744a9ac7ab7ec1e3381a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFbBFxBm6SZ1ZjK5jDsJ9VIKgrbrcDI50WnTtMwkSlz5CD6jT-KUinTj6hz4v_Nx-Ak552zEGRNXurOLEVfigAy4jFUQJkwekgFTURpEPImPyYlzC-ZRnvIB2Ty30OL351cBDkvqr63RXd2t6AqWpnmhpqGzzi6xv6bZXrgu0TbmA1qzbjxjWuPXN6TQlLR9RVp7q2up0wYbjXveU3JUQe3w7HcOyfx2PMvug-nj3UN2Mw20kKkIylLKqKjiWCiEsixCETPOC9QgtGZxqEQsU4AoFZVKpAQFOoEiQc0xDFMO4ZBc7rzarp2zWOUba1Zg-5yzfNtUvm0q90159GKHov_xDxtPeJiIJIp8Huzyd1Nj_68nz-ZPk63vB74meIE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>State‐based curriculum making in Turkey: Curriculum modernization initiative and the latest science curriculum</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Wiley Online (Archive)</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Ozturk‐Akar, Ebru</creator><creatorcontrib>Ozturk‐Akar, Ebru</creatorcontrib><description>Turkey's politically induced ‘curricular modernization initiative’ intended a philosophical change and a system‐level transformation from behaviouristic to constructivist‐inspired pedagogies in the early 2000s. Science curriculum has been one of the curricula that has taken precedence. It has changed four times since then. The latest science curriculum for grades 3–8 – age group 9–13 – is issued in 2018. This study examines these curricula and discusses curriculum making at the macro site. Whether or to what extent the tools of state‐based curriculum making (ToSBCM) are used is also investigated. Directed content analysis and thematic analysis are used to address the research questions. Findings revealed that Turkey's latest science curriculum is a reformulation of its predecessors' goals, learning outcomes and content. ToSBCM are effectively used in introducing the new emphases of curriculum, managing discourse communities and granting the executive responsibility to teachers. Considering Turkey's curricular experiences as a country which has one of the most centralized education systems among OECD countries, and a very large hierarchical national administration with schools having the lowest levels of autonomy in determining curriculum and assessment policies among countries participating in PISA, findings offer opportunities to compare and discuss processes of curriculum making with an international perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-5176</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-3704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/curj.192</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wiley</publisher><subject>Achievement Tests ; Administrative Organization ; Comparative Analysis ; Constructivism (Learning) ; Content Analysis ; Curriculum Development ; Educational Administration ; Educational Change ; Educational Philosophy ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Foreign Countries ; Institutional Autonomy ; International Assessment ; National Curriculum ; Outcomes of Education ; Political Influences ; Science Curriculum ; Science Education ; Secondary School Students ; state‐based curriculum making ; Turkey</subject><ispartof>Curriculum journal (London, England), 2023-06, Vol.34 (2), p.298-314</ispartof><rights>2022 British Educational Research Association.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2482-dd445bf6629eaddb326011beca2cc06392648aa582f9744a9ac7ab7ec1e3381a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7754-360X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcurj.192$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcurj.192$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27924,27925,46049,46473</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1372755$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ozturk‐Akar, Ebru</creatorcontrib><title>State‐based curriculum making in Turkey: Curriculum modernization initiative and the latest science curriculum</title><title>Curriculum journal (London, England)</title><description>Turkey's politically induced ‘curricular modernization initiative’ intended a philosophical change and a system‐level transformation from behaviouristic to constructivist‐inspired pedagogies in the early 2000s. Science curriculum has been one of the curricula that has taken precedence. It has changed four times since then. The latest science curriculum for grades 3–8 – age group 9–13 – is issued in 2018. This study examines these curricula and discusses curriculum making at the macro site. Whether or to what extent the tools of state‐based curriculum making (ToSBCM) are used is also investigated. Directed content analysis and thematic analysis are used to address the research questions. Findings revealed that Turkey's latest science curriculum is a reformulation of its predecessors' goals, learning outcomes and content. ToSBCM are effectively used in introducing the new emphases of curriculum, managing discourse communities and granting the executive responsibility to teachers. Considering Turkey's curricular experiences as a country which has one of the most centralized education systems among OECD countries, and a very large hierarchical national administration with schools having the lowest levels of autonomy in determining curriculum and assessment policies among countries participating in PISA, findings offer opportunities to compare and discuss processes of curriculum making with an international perspective.</description><subject>Achievement Tests</subject><subject>Administrative Organization</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Constructivism (Learning)</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Educational Administration</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Institutional Autonomy</subject><subject>International Assessment</subject><subject>National Curriculum</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Political Influences</subject><subject>Science Curriculum</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>state‐based curriculum making</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><issn>0958-5176</issn><issn>1469-3704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhgdRsFbBFxBm6SZ1ZjK5jDsJ9VIKgrbrcDI50WnTtMwkSlz5CD6jT-KUinTj6hz4v_Nx-Ak552zEGRNXurOLEVfigAy4jFUQJkwekgFTURpEPImPyYlzC-ZRnvIB2Ty30OL351cBDkvqr63RXd2t6AqWpnmhpqGzzi6xv6bZXrgu0TbmA1qzbjxjWuPXN6TQlLR9RVp7q2up0wYbjXveU3JUQe3w7HcOyfx2PMvug-nj3UN2Mw20kKkIylLKqKjiWCiEsixCETPOC9QgtGZxqEQsU4AoFZVKpAQFOoEiQc0xDFMO4ZBc7rzarp2zWOUba1Zg-5yzfNtUvm0q90159GKHov_xDxtPeJiIJIp8Huzyd1Nj_68nz-ZPk63vB74meIE</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Ozturk‐Akar, Ebru</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-360X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>State‐based curriculum making in Turkey: Curriculum modernization initiative and the latest science curriculum</title><author>Ozturk‐Akar, Ebru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2482-dd445bf6629eaddb326011beca2cc06392648aa582f9744a9ac7ab7ec1e3381a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Achievement Tests</topic><topic>Administrative Organization</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Constructivism (Learning)</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Educational Administration</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Institutional Autonomy</topic><topic>International Assessment</topic><topic>National Curriculum</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Political Influences</topic><topic>Science Curriculum</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>state‐based curriculum making</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ozturk‐Akar, Ebru</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Curriculum journal (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ozturk‐Akar, Ebru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1372755</ericid><atitle>State‐based curriculum making in Turkey: Curriculum modernization initiative and the latest science curriculum</atitle><jtitle>Curriculum journal (London, England)</jtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>298</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>298-314</pages><issn>0958-5176</issn><eissn>1469-3704</eissn><abstract>Turkey's politically induced ‘curricular modernization initiative’ intended a philosophical change and a system‐level transformation from behaviouristic to constructivist‐inspired pedagogies in the early 2000s. Science curriculum has been one of the curricula that has taken precedence. It has changed four times since then. The latest science curriculum for grades 3–8 – age group 9–13 – is issued in 2018. This study examines these curricula and discusses curriculum making at the macro site. Whether or to what extent the tools of state‐based curriculum making (ToSBCM) are used is also investigated. Directed content analysis and thematic analysis are used to address the research questions. Findings revealed that Turkey's latest science curriculum is a reformulation of its predecessors' goals, learning outcomes and content. ToSBCM are effectively used in introducing the new emphases of curriculum, managing discourse communities and granting the executive responsibility to teachers. Considering Turkey's curricular experiences as a country which has one of the most centralized education systems among OECD countries, and a very large hierarchical national administration with schools having the lowest levels of autonomy in determining curriculum and assessment policies among countries participating in PISA, findings offer opportunities to compare and discuss processes of curriculum making with an international perspective.</abstract><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1002/curj.192</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7754-360X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-5176 |
ispartof | Curriculum journal (London, England), 2023-06, Vol.34 (2), p.298-314 |
issn | 0958-5176 1469-3704 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_curj_192 |
source | Wiley; Wiley Online (Archive); ERIC |
subjects | Achievement Tests Administrative Organization Comparative Analysis Constructivism (Learning) Content Analysis Curriculum Development Educational Administration Educational Change Educational Philosophy Elementary Secondary Education Foreign Countries Institutional Autonomy International Assessment National Curriculum Outcomes of Education Political Influences Science Curriculum Science Education Secondary School Students state‐based curriculum making Turkey |
title | State‐based curriculum making in Turkey: Curriculum modernization initiative and the latest science curriculum |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A58%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%E2%80%90based%20curriculum%20making%20in%20Turkey:%20Curriculum%20modernization%20initiative%20and%20the%20latest%20science%20curriculum&rft.jtitle=Curriculum%20journal%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Ozturk%E2%80%90Akar,%20Ebru&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=298&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=298-314&rft.issn=0958-5176&rft.eissn=1469-3704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/curj.192&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1372755%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2482-dd445bf6629eaddb326011beca2cc06392648aa582f9744a9ac7ab7ec1e3381a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1372755&rfr_iscdi=true |