Loading…

Evaluating an α-β filter in terms of increasing a track update-sampling rate and improving measurement accuracy

The α–β filter estimates the true values of the position and velocity of the target from the observed target position. If the driving noise indicating the ambiguity of the target motion differs, then various different α–β filters can be derived from a Kalman filter that uses a constant‐velocity line...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electronics & communications in Japan. Part 1, Communications Communications, 2003-10, Vol.86 (10), p.10-20
Main Authors: Kosuge, Yoshio, Ito, Masayoshi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The α–β filter estimates the true values of the position and velocity of the target from the observed target position. If the driving noise indicating the ambiguity of the target motion differs, then various different α–β filters can be derived from a Kalman filter that uses a constant‐velocity linear motion model. On the other hand, the MV filter is an α–β filter that minimizes the variations of the steady error of the predicted value of the target position for a target in constant‐velocity linear motion, under the condition that the steady tracking error for the target with constant acceleration is constant. This MV filter cannot be derived from the Kalman filter. Note that there are methods of increasing the sampling rate and of improving observation accuracy for improvement of tracking capability. However, when multiple targets are tracked at the same time, the electromagnetic illumination time per target is necessarily reduced. In this paper, the tracking capability of the above α–β filter with constant gains is evaluated in terms of the tracking accuracy for a target in constant‐velocity linear motion under the condition that the steady tracking error for a target in constant‐acceleration motion is constant. It is found advantageous to increase the sample rate rather than to improve the observation accuracy if the electromagnetic illumination time is constant. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Electron Comm Jpn Pt 1, 86(10): 10–20, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/ecja.10113
ISSN:8756-6621
1520-6424
DOI:10.1002/ecja.10113