Loading…
Switching the Macrocycle Conformation from Nonplanar to Planar in Cobalt(II) and Copper(II) β‐Tetra‐2′‐thienyl‐ meso ‐tetraphenylporphyrin Cocrystallates with C 60
Crystal structures of cobalt(II) and copper(II) complexes of 2,3,12,13‐tetra‐2′‐thienyl‐5,10,15,20‐tetraphenylporphyrin/C 60 cocrystallates were determined by single‐crystal XRD analysis. The crystal structures of the two cocrystallates, MTPP(2′‐thienyl) 4 · C 60 · (toluene) 2 (M = Co II and Cu II ;...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of inorganic chemistry 2014-11, Vol.2014 (33), p.5646-5650 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Crystal structures of cobalt(II) and copper(II) complexes of 2,3,12,13‐tetra‐2′‐thienyl‐5,10,15,20‐tetraphenylporphyrin/C
60
cocrystallates were determined by single‐crystal XRD analysis. The crystal structures of the two cocrystallates, MTPP(2′‐thienyl)
4
·
C
60
·
(toluene)
2
(M = Co
II
and Cu
II
; TPP = tetraphenylporphyrin), compounds
1
and
2
, respectively, are
isomorphous
and reveal a one‐dimensional (1D) supramolecular structure. In these cocrystallates, the macrocycle is almost planar within ±0.08 Å, as evidenced by comparing the value of Δ
C
b
(the average deviation of the β‐pyrrole carbon from the porphyrin ring mean plane) with those for the nonplanar parent structures, CoTPP(2′‐thienyl)
4
[±0.710(5) Å] and CuTPP(2′‐thienyl)
4
[±0.546(2) Å]. This difference has been ascribed to intermolecular interactions and/or crystal packing forces. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1434-1948 1099-0682 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ejic.201402763 |