Loading…

An Ethanol Biosensor Based on Simple Immobilization of Alcohol Dehydrogenase on Fe 3 O 4 @Au Nanoparticles

An ethanol biosensor based on alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) attached to Au seeds decorated on magnetic nanoparticles (Fe 3 O 4 @Au NPs) is presented. ADH was immobilized on Fe 3 O 4 @Au NPs, which were subsequently fixed by a magnet on a carbon paste electrode modified with 5 % (m : m) MnO 2 . Optimum...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electroanalysis (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2015-12, Vol.27 (12), p.2829-2837
Main Authors: Samphao, Anchalee, Kunpatee, Kanjana, Prayoonpokarach, Sanchai, Wittayakun, Jatuporn, Švorc, Ľubomír, Stankovic, Dalibor M., Zagar, Kristina, Ceh, Miran, Kalcher, Kurt
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:An ethanol biosensor based on alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) attached to Au seeds decorated on magnetic nanoparticles (Fe 3 O 4 @Au NPs) is presented. ADH was immobilized on Fe 3 O 4 @Au NPs, which were subsequently fixed by a magnet on a carbon paste electrode modified with 5 % (m : m) MnO 2 . Optimum conditions for the amperometric determination of ethanol with the biosensor were as follows: working potential +0.1 V (vs. Ag/AgCl); supporting electrolyte: 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution at pH 6.8 containing 0.25 mM of the coenzyme (NAD + ); working electrode: carbon paste with magnetically attached Fe 3 O 4 @Au NPs (0.012 mg ⋅ cm −2 electrode area) with immobilized alcohol dehydrogenase (120 units per cm 2 of electrode area). Linearity between signal and concentration was found for the range from 0.1 to 2.0 M ethanol (r 2 =0.995) with a detection limit of 0.07 M, a sensitivity of 0.02 µA ⋅ mM −1  ⋅ cm −2 , a reproducibility of 4.0 % RSD, and a repeatability of 2.7 % RSD. The results for the determination of ethanol in alcoholic beverages showed good agreement with gas chromatography (GC) with recovery of 96.0 – 108.8 %.
ISSN:1040-0397
1521-4109
DOI:10.1002/elan.201500315