Loading…

Effect of drainage and wildfire on peat hydrophysical properties

Consecutive multiple disturbances to northern peatlands can dramatically impact peat hydrophysical properties. We examine the impact of a double disturbance (drainage and wildfire) on the hydrophysical and moisture retention properties of peat, a key regulator of peatland ecohydrological resilience,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological processes 2013-06, Vol.27 (13), p.1866-1874
Main Authors: Sherwood, J. H., Kettridge, N., Thompson, D. K., Morris, P. J., Silins, U., Waddington, J. M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3920-7fc75b537104e8a974c06139e9d976c9b0676e0153fd58618dc8df8ebca362b33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3920-7fc75b537104e8a974c06139e9d976c9b0676e0153fd58618dc8df8ebca362b33
container_end_page 1874
container_issue 13
container_start_page 1866
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 27
creator Sherwood, J. H.
Kettridge, N.
Thompson, D. K.
Morris, P. J.
Silins, U.
Waddington, J. M.
description Consecutive multiple disturbances to northern peatlands can dramatically impact peat hydrophysical properties. We examine the impact of a double disturbance (drainage and wildfire) on the hydrophysical and moisture retention properties of peat, a key regulator of peatland ecohydrological resilience, and compare this with the impact to each individual disturbance (drainage and wildfire). The compound effect of drainage and wildfire resulted in a shift of the surface datum down the peat profile, revealing denser peat. Less‐dense near‐surface peats that regulate water‐table position and near‐surface moisture content, both favourable to Sphagnum recolonization, were lost. At a drained peatland that was then subject to wildfire, peat bulk density increased by 14.1%, von Post humification class increased by two categories and water retention increased by 15.6%, compared with an adjacent burned but undrained (single disturbance) portion of the fen. We discuss the key hydrophysical metrics of peatland vulnerability and outline how they are affected by the isolated impacts of drainage and wildfire, as well as their combined effects. We demonstrate that multiple peatland disturbances have likely led to an increase in hydrological limitations to Sphagnum recovery, which may impact peatland ecohydrological resilience. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.9820
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_9820</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_Z1B54D4Q_9</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3920-7fc75b537104e8a974c06139e9d976c9b0676e0153fd58618dc8df8ebca362b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1z0tLw0AUhuFBFKxV8CfM0k3qmUzmtlNrbYXiBRTRzTCZi43WJMwENP_elIrgwtU5i4cPXoSOCUwIQH666tuJkjnsoBEBpTICku2iEUjJMg5S7KODlN4AoAAJI3Q2C8HbDjcBu2iq2rx6bGqHP6u1C1X0uKlx602HV72LTbvqU2XNGrfD72NX-XSI9oJZJ3_0c8fo8Wr2MF1ky9v59fR8mRmqcshEsIKVjAoChZdGicICJ1R55ZTgVpXABfdAGA2OSU6ks9IF6UtrKM9LSsfoZLtrY5NS9EG3sfowsdcE9KZcD-V6Uz7QbEuHCN__6_Ti-e6vr1Lnv369ie-aCyqYfrqZ6xdywYrL4l4r-g34Ymjr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of drainage and wildfire on peat hydrophysical properties</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Sherwood, J. H. ; Kettridge, N. ; Thompson, D. K. ; Morris, P. J. ; Silins, U. ; Waddington, J. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherwood, J. H. ; Kettridge, N. ; Thompson, D. K. ; Morris, P. J. ; Silins, U. ; Waddington, J. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Consecutive multiple disturbances to northern peatlands can dramatically impact peat hydrophysical properties. We examine the impact of a double disturbance (drainage and wildfire) on the hydrophysical and moisture retention properties of peat, a key regulator of peatland ecohydrological resilience, and compare this with the impact to each individual disturbance (drainage and wildfire). The compound effect of drainage and wildfire resulted in a shift of the surface datum down the peat profile, revealing denser peat. Less‐dense near‐surface peats that regulate water‐table position and near‐surface moisture content, both favourable to Sphagnum recolonization, were lost. At a drained peatland that was then subject to wildfire, peat bulk density increased by 14.1%, von Post humification class increased by two categories and water retention increased by 15.6%, compared with an adjacent burned but undrained (single disturbance) portion of the fen. We discuss the key hydrophysical metrics of peatland vulnerability and outline how they are affected by the isolated impacts of drainage and wildfire, as well as their combined effects. We demonstrate that multiple peatland disturbances have likely led to an increase in hydrological limitations to Sphagnum recovery, which may impact peatland ecohydrological resilience. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>drainage ; hydraulic conductivity ; moisture characteristic ; moisture retention ; peatland ; van Genuchten parameters ; wildfire</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2013-06, Vol.27 (13), p.1866-1874</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3920-7fc75b537104e8a974c06139e9d976c9b0676e0153fd58618dc8df8ebca362b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3920-7fc75b537104e8a974c06139e9d976c9b0676e0153fd58618dc8df8ebca362b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherwood, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettridge, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, D. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silins, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddington, J. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of drainage and wildfire on peat hydrophysical properties</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Consecutive multiple disturbances to northern peatlands can dramatically impact peat hydrophysical properties. We examine the impact of a double disturbance (drainage and wildfire) on the hydrophysical and moisture retention properties of peat, a key regulator of peatland ecohydrological resilience, and compare this with the impact to each individual disturbance (drainage and wildfire). The compound effect of drainage and wildfire resulted in a shift of the surface datum down the peat profile, revealing denser peat. Less‐dense near‐surface peats that regulate water‐table position and near‐surface moisture content, both favourable to Sphagnum recolonization, were lost. At a drained peatland that was then subject to wildfire, peat bulk density increased by 14.1%, von Post humification class increased by two categories and water retention increased by 15.6%, compared with an adjacent burned but undrained (single disturbance) portion of the fen. We discuss the key hydrophysical metrics of peatland vulnerability and outline how they are affected by the isolated impacts of drainage and wildfire, as well as their combined effects. We demonstrate that multiple peatland disturbances have likely led to an increase in hydrological limitations to Sphagnum recovery, which may impact peatland ecohydrological resilience. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>drainage</subject><subject>hydraulic conductivity</subject><subject>moisture characteristic</subject><subject>moisture retention</subject><subject>peatland</subject><subject>van Genuchten parameters</subject><subject>wildfire</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1z0tLw0AUhuFBFKxV8CfM0k3qmUzmtlNrbYXiBRTRzTCZi43WJMwENP_elIrgwtU5i4cPXoSOCUwIQH666tuJkjnsoBEBpTICku2iEUjJMg5S7KODlN4AoAAJI3Q2C8HbDjcBu2iq2rx6bGqHP6u1C1X0uKlx602HV72LTbvqU2XNGrfD72NX-XSI9oJZJ3_0c8fo8Wr2MF1ky9v59fR8mRmqcshEsIKVjAoChZdGicICJ1R55ZTgVpXABfdAGA2OSU6ks9IF6UtrKM9LSsfoZLtrY5NS9EG3sfowsdcE9KZcD-V6Uz7QbEuHCN__6_Ti-e6vr1Lnv369ie-aCyqYfrqZ6xdywYrL4l4r-g34Ymjr</recordid><startdate>20130630</startdate><enddate>20130630</enddate><creator>Sherwood, J. H.</creator><creator>Kettridge, N.</creator><creator>Thompson, D. K.</creator><creator>Morris, P. J.</creator><creator>Silins, U.</creator><creator>Waddington, J. M.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130630</creationdate><title>Effect of drainage and wildfire on peat hydrophysical properties</title><author>Sherwood, J. H. ; Kettridge, N. ; Thompson, D. K. ; Morris, P. J. ; Silins, U. ; Waddington, J. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3920-7fc75b537104e8a974c06139e9d976c9b0676e0153fd58618dc8df8ebca362b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>drainage</topic><topic>hydraulic conductivity</topic><topic>moisture characteristic</topic><topic>moisture retention</topic><topic>peatland</topic><topic>van Genuchten parameters</topic><topic>wildfire</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherwood, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettridge, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, D. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, P. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silins, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waddington, J. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherwood, J. H.</au><au>Kettridge, N.</au><au>Thompson, D. K.</au><au>Morris, P. J.</au><au>Silins, U.</au><au>Waddington, J. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of drainage and wildfire on peat hydrophysical properties</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2013-06-30</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>1866</spage><epage>1874</epage><pages>1866-1874</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Consecutive multiple disturbances to northern peatlands can dramatically impact peat hydrophysical properties. We examine the impact of a double disturbance (drainage and wildfire) on the hydrophysical and moisture retention properties of peat, a key regulator of peatland ecohydrological resilience, and compare this with the impact to each individual disturbance (drainage and wildfire). The compound effect of drainage and wildfire resulted in a shift of the surface datum down the peat profile, revealing denser peat. Less‐dense near‐surface peats that regulate water‐table position and near‐surface moisture content, both favourable to Sphagnum recolonization, were lost. At a drained peatland that was then subject to wildfire, peat bulk density increased by 14.1%, von Post humification class increased by two categories and water retention increased by 15.6%, compared with an adjacent burned but undrained (single disturbance) portion of the fen. We discuss the key hydrophysical metrics of peatland vulnerability and outline how they are affected by the isolated impacts of drainage and wildfire, as well as their combined effects. We demonstrate that multiple peatland disturbances have likely led to an increase in hydrological limitations to Sphagnum recovery, which may impact peatland ecohydrological resilience. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.9820</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2013-06, Vol.27 (13), p.1866-1874
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_hyp_9820
source Wiley
subjects drainage
hydraulic conductivity
moisture characteristic
moisture retention
peatland
van Genuchten parameters
wildfire
title Effect of drainage and wildfire on peat hydrophysical properties
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T16%3A10%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20drainage%20and%20wildfire%20on%20peat%20hydrophysical%20properties&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Sherwood,%20J.%20H.&rft.date=2013-06-30&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=1866&rft.epage=1874&rft.pages=1866-1874&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.9820&rft_dat=%3Cistex_cross%3Eark_67375_WNG_Z1B54D4Q_9%3C/istex_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3920-7fc75b537104e8a974c06139e9d976c9b0676e0153fd58618dc8df8ebca362b33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true