Loading…

The Adverse Effect of Choice in Donation Decisions

Many charitable organizations offer potential donors the option to choose their donation recipients—suggesting that organizations perceive the availability of such choice as beneficial to donation raising. Building upon research on choice aversion in the context of consumer goods and on the identifi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of consumer psychology 2021-07, Vol.31 (3), p.570-586
Main Authors: Ein‐Gar, Danit, Levontin, Liat, Kogut, Tehila
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-22507678d7632156b718cd4063077d9516d962e8ec750a204ea6b2969e831263
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-22507678d7632156b718cd4063077d9516d962e8ec750a204ea6b2969e831263
container_end_page 586
container_issue 3
container_start_page 570
container_title Journal of consumer psychology
container_volume 31
creator Ein‐Gar, Danit
Levontin, Liat
Kogut, Tehila
description Many charitable organizations offer potential donors the option to choose their donation recipients—suggesting that organizations perceive the availability of such choice as beneficial to donation raising. Building upon research on choice aversion in the context of consumer goods and on the identifiable victim effect in the context of donation giving, we propose that the need to choose one target among multiple needy targets might, in fact, hinder donations. Results of six studies show that when prospective donors are asked to choose between two similar donation targets, they are more likely to opt out of donating altogether than when asked to donate to a single target. We show that the effect of choice on opt‐out rates in donation settings is driven by the conflict between the wish to be helpful and the wish to be fair. We further show that when the conflict is resolved and the choice does not raise fairness concerns, the effect is attenuated and opt‐out rates decline. This article is part of the issue “Consumer Psychology for the Greater Good”.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jcpy.1230
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jcpy_1230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>JCPY1230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-22507678d7632156b718cd4063077d9516d962e8ec750a204ea6b2969e831263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1jzFPwzAQRi0EEqUw8A-yMqQ9n-NzPFahFFAlGLIwWalzUV2VpoorUP49CWVluje876QnxL2EmQTA-c4f-5lEBRdiIrXC1BCpy4FBm9RkkF-Lmxh3AJBpbScCyy0ni_qLu8jJsmnYn5K2SYptGzwn4ZA8tofqFNoB2Ic4QLwVV021j3z3d6eifFqWxXO6flu9FIt16pEspIgaDJm8NqRQatoYmfs6A1JgTG21pNoScs7eaKgQMq5og5Ys50oiqal4OL_1XRtjx407duGz6nonwY2tbmx1Y-vgzs_ud9hz_7_oXov3j9_FD1RbUzk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Adverse Effect of Choice in Donation Decisions</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Ein‐Gar, Danit ; Levontin, Liat ; Kogut, Tehila</creator><creatorcontrib>Ein‐Gar, Danit ; Levontin, Liat ; Kogut, Tehila</creatorcontrib><description>Many charitable organizations offer potential donors the option to choose their donation recipients—suggesting that organizations perceive the availability of such choice as beneficial to donation raising. Building upon research on choice aversion in the context of consumer goods and on the identifiable victim effect in the context of donation giving, we propose that the need to choose one target among multiple needy targets might, in fact, hinder donations. Results of six studies show that when prospective donors are asked to choose between two similar donation targets, they are more likely to opt out of donating altogether than when asked to donate to a single target. We show that the effect of choice on opt‐out rates in donation settings is driven by the conflict between the wish to be helpful and the wish to be fair. We further show that when the conflict is resolved and the choice does not raise fairness concerns, the effect is attenuated and opt‐out rates decline. This article is part of the issue “Consumer Psychology for the Greater Good”.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1057-7408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7663</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcpy.1230</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Charitable giving and prosocial behavior ; Online consumer behavior</subject><ispartof>Journal of consumer psychology, 2021-07, Vol.31 (3), p.570-586</ispartof><rights>2021 Society for Consumer Psychology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-22507678d7632156b718cd4063077d9516d962e8ec750a204ea6b2969e831263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-22507678d7632156b718cd4063077d9516d962e8ec750a204ea6b2969e831263</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0508-5547 ; 0000-0001-9692-4555 ; 0000-0001-8652-5112</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ein‐Gar, Danit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levontin, Liat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogut, Tehila</creatorcontrib><title>The Adverse Effect of Choice in Donation Decisions</title><title>Journal of consumer psychology</title><description>Many charitable organizations offer potential donors the option to choose their donation recipients—suggesting that organizations perceive the availability of such choice as beneficial to donation raising. Building upon research on choice aversion in the context of consumer goods and on the identifiable victim effect in the context of donation giving, we propose that the need to choose one target among multiple needy targets might, in fact, hinder donations. Results of six studies show that when prospective donors are asked to choose between two similar donation targets, they are more likely to opt out of donating altogether than when asked to donate to a single target. We show that the effect of choice on opt‐out rates in donation settings is driven by the conflict between the wish to be helpful and the wish to be fair. We further show that when the conflict is resolved and the choice does not raise fairness concerns, the effect is attenuated and opt‐out rates decline. This article is part of the issue “Consumer Psychology for the Greater Good”.</description><subject>Charitable giving and prosocial behavior</subject><subject>Online consumer behavior</subject><issn>1057-7408</issn><issn>1532-7663</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1jzFPwzAQRi0EEqUw8A-yMqQ9n-NzPFahFFAlGLIwWalzUV2VpoorUP49CWVluje876QnxL2EmQTA-c4f-5lEBRdiIrXC1BCpy4FBm9RkkF-Lmxh3AJBpbScCyy0ni_qLu8jJsmnYn5K2SYptGzwn4ZA8tofqFNoB2Ic4QLwVV021j3z3d6eifFqWxXO6flu9FIt16pEspIgaDJm8NqRQatoYmfs6A1JgTG21pNoScs7eaKgQMq5og5Ys50oiqal4OL_1XRtjx407duGz6nonwY2tbmx1Y-vgzs_ud9hz_7_oXov3j9_FD1RbUzk</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Ein‐Gar, Danit</creator><creator>Levontin, Liat</creator><creator>Kogut, Tehila</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0508-5547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9692-4555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-5112</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>The Adverse Effect of Choice in Donation Decisions</title><author>Ein‐Gar, Danit ; Levontin, Liat ; Kogut, Tehila</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-22507678d7632156b718cd4063077d9516d962e8ec750a204ea6b2969e831263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Charitable giving and prosocial behavior</topic><topic>Online consumer behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ein‐Gar, Danit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levontin, Liat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kogut, Tehila</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of consumer psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ein‐Gar, Danit</au><au>Levontin, Liat</au><au>Kogut, Tehila</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Adverse Effect of Choice in Donation Decisions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of consumer psychology</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>570</spage><epage>586</epage><pages>570-586</pages><issn>1057-7408</issn><eissn>1532-7663</eissn><abstract>Many charitable organizations offer potential donors the option to choose their donation recipients—suggesting that organizations perceive the availability of such choice as beneficial to donation raising. Building upon research on choice aversion in the context of consumer goods and on the identifiable victim effect in the context of donation giving, we propose that the need to choose one target among multiple needy targets might, in fact, hinder donations. Results of six studies show that when prospective donors are asked to choose between two similar donation targets, they are more likely to opt out of donating altogether than when asked to donate to a single target. We show that the effect of choice on opt‐out rates in donation settings is driven by the conflict between the wish to be helpful and the wish to be fair. We further show that when the conflict is resolved and the choice does not raise fairness concerns, the effect is attenuated and opt‐out rates decline. This article is part of the issue “Consumer Psychology for the Greater Good”.</abstract><doi>10.1002/jcpy.1230</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0508-5547</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9692-4555</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-5112</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1057-7408
ispartof Journal of consumer psychology, 2021-07, Vol.31 (3), p.570-586
issn 1057-7408
1532-7663
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_jcpy_1230
source Wiley
subjects Charitable giving and prosocial behavior
Online consumer behavior
title The Adverse Effect of Choice in Donation Decisions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A19%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Adverse%20Effect%20of%20Choice%20in%20Donation%20Decisions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20consumer%20psychology&rft.au=Ein%E2%80%90Gar,%20Danit&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=570&rft.epage=586&rft.pages=570-586&rft.issn=1057-7408&rft.eissn=1532-7663&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcpy.1230&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_cross%3EJCPY1230%3C/wiley_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2690-22507678d7632156b718cd4063077d9516d962e8ec750a204ea6b2969e831263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true