Loading…
Root size and nitrogen-uptake activity in two maize (Zea mays) inbred lines differing in nitrogen-use efficiency
Considerable differences in response to nitrogen (N) availability among plant species and cultivars have been well documented. Focusing on the uptake of N, it is not clear which factor or factors determine efficient N acquisition. Two maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines (478, N-efficient; W312, N-ineff...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of plant nutrition and soil science 2009-04, Vol.172 (2), p.230-236 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Considerable differences in response to nitrogen (N) availability among plant species and cultivars have been well documented. Focusing on the uptake of N, it is not clear which factor or factors determine efficient N acquisition. Two maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines (478, N-efficient; W312, N-inefficient) were used to compare the relative contribution of root uptake activity and root size to N acquisition. Nitrogen-efficient inbred 478 had higher yields and accumulated more N under field conditions than W312 under both high- (135 kg N ha⁻¹) and low-N (no N supplied) conditions. The root system of 478, as indicated by total root length, root biomass, and root-to-shoot ratio, was larger and more responsive to low N stress. Especially, 478 developed more and longer axial roots at low N stress. On the contrary, the average N-accumulation rate in 478 was lower than that of Wu312. In solution culture, ¹³NO₃ ⁻ influx in 478 was lower than in W312 after 8 h of nitrate provision. The expression of nitrate-transporter genes ZmNRT1.1, ZmNRT2.1, ZmNRT2.2, and ZmNAR2.1 was stronger and lasted for a longer time after NO$ _3^- $ induction in W312. It is concluded that the efficient N acquisition in 478 is due to (1) a larger root system and (2) a stronger response of root growth to low N induction. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1436-8730 1522-2624 |
DOI: | 10.1002/jpln.200800028 |