Loading…
Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH
Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐...
Saved in:
Published in: | Magnetic resonance in chemistry 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.775-787 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903 |
container_end_page | 787 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 775 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in chemistry |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | San Fabián, J. García de la Vega, J.M. Suardíaz, R. Fernández‐Oliva, M. Pérez, C. Crespo‐Otero, R. Contreras, R.H. |
description | Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐pVQZ, pcJ‐2 and pcJ‐3) using 68 organic molecular systems with 88
1
J
CH
couplings including different types of hybridized carbon atoms. Density functional theory assessment for the determination of
1
J
CH
coupling constants is examined, comparing the computed and experimental values. The use of shifting constants for obtaining the calculated coupling improves substantially the results, and most models become qualitatively similar. Thus, for the whole set of couplings and for all approaches excluding those using the M06 functional, the root‐mean‐square deviations lie between 4.7 and 16.4 Hz and are reduced to 4–6.5 Hz when shifting constants are considered. Alternatively, when a specific rovibrational contribution of 5 Hz is subtracted from the experimental values, good results are obtained with PBE, B3P86 and B97‐2 functionals in combination with HIII‐su3, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J and pcJ‐2 basis sets. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrc.4014 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_mrc_4014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_mrc_4014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAYhIMoWFfBn5Cjl65vmqRpvUlRV1kVdA97K2_zoZW2KUlX8N-7XT3NMDPM4SHkksGSAWTXfdBLAUwckYRBqVIhi-0xSUCJMmWyYKfkLMYvAChLxROyrXw_7iacWj9gR1-e36j2u7Frh4-9GeKEwxRv6Ptn66Y5w8HQqPHQO9STD5E6H6j9xm6HhwmjT7RanZMTh120F_-6IJv7u021StevD4_V7TrVKhOpAZU1RgijC2szbkopjWsK5nIjBUoFGqzkRioJLssLRNVobsDm85qXwBfk6u9WBx9jsK4eQ9tj-KkZ1DOQeg-knoHwX3PcU-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>San Fabián, J. ; García de la Vega, J.M. ; Suardíaz, R. ; Fernández‐Oliva, M. ; Pérez, C. ; Crespo‐Otero, R. ; Contreras, R.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>San Fabián, J. ; García de la Vega, J.M. ; Suardíaz, R. ; Fernández‐Oliva, M. ; Pérez, C. ; Crespo‐Otero, R. ; Contreras, R.H.</creatorcontrib><description>Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐pVQZ, pcJ‐2 and pcJ‐3) using 68 organic molecular systems with 88
1
J
CH
couplings including different types of hybridized carbon atoms. Density functional theory assessment for the determination of
1
J
CH
coupling constants is examined, comparing the computed and experimental values. The use of shifting constants for obtaining the calculated coupling improves substantially the results, and most models become qualitatively similar. Thus, for the whole set of couplings and for all approaches excluding those using the M06 functional, the root‐mean‐square deviations lie between 4.7 and 16.4 Hz and are reduced to 4–6.5 Hz when shifting constants are considered. Alternatively, when a specific rovibrational contribution of 5 Hz is subtracted from the experimental values, good results are obtained with PBE, B3P86 and B97‐2 functionals in combination with HIII‐su3, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J and pcJ‐2 basis sets. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-1581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-458X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4014</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in chemistry, 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.775-787</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>San Fabián, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García de la Vega, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suardíaz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Oliva, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo‐Otero, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, R.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH</title><title>Magnetic resonance in chemistry</title><description>Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐pVQZ, pcJ‐2 and pcJ‐3) using 68 organic molecular systems with 88
1
J
CH
couplings including different types of hybridized carbon atoms. Density functional theory assessment for the determination of
1
J
CH
coupling constants is examined, comparing the computed and experimental values. The use of shifting constants for obtaining the calculated coupling improves substantially the results, and most models become qualitatively similar. Thus, for the whole set of couplings and for all approaches excluding those using the M06 functional, the root‐mean‐square deviations lie between 4.7 and 16.4 Hz and are reduced to 4–6.5 Hz when shifting constants are considered. Alternatively, when a specific rovibrational contribution of 5 Hz is subtracted from the experimental values, good results are obtained with PBE, B3P86 and B97‐2 functionals in combination with HIII‐su3, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J and pcJ‐2 basis sets. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><issn>0749-1581</issn><issn>1097-458X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAYhIMoWFfBn5Cjl65vmqRpvUlRV1kVdA97K2_zoZW2KUlX8N-7XT3NMDPM4SHkksGSAWTXfdBLAUwckYRBqVIhi-0xSUCJMmWyYKfkLMYvAChLxROyrXw_7iacWj9gR1-e36j2u7Frh4-9GeKEwxRv6Ptn66Y5w8HQqPHQO9STD5E6H6j9xm6HhwmjT7RanZMTh120F_-6IJv7u021StevD4_V7TrVKhOpAZU1RgijC2szbkopjWsK5nIjBUoFGqzkRioJLssLRNVobsDm85qXwBfk6u9WBx9jsK4eQ9tj-KkZ1DOQeg-knoHwX3PcU-c</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>San Fabián, J.</creator><creator>García de la Vega, J.M.</creator><creator>Suardíaz, R.</creator><creator>Fernández‐Oliva, M.</creator><creator>Pérez, C.</creator><creator>Crespo‐Otero, R.</creator><creator>Contreras, R.H.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH</title><author>San Fabián, J. ; García de la Vega, J.M. ; Suardíaz, R. ; Fernández‐Oliva, M. ; Pérez, C. ; Crespo‐Otero, R. ; Contreras, R.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>San Fabián, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García de la Vega, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suardíaz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Oliva, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo‐Otero, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, R.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>San Fabián, J.</au><au>García de la Vega, J.M.</au><au>Suardíaz, R.</au><au>Fernández‐Oliva, M.</au><au>Pérez, C.</au><au>Crespo‐Otero, R.</au><au>Contreras, R.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in chemistry</jtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>775</spage><epage>787</epage><pages>775-787</pages><issn>0749-1581</issn><eissn>1097-458X</eissn><abstract>Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐pVQZ, pcJ‐2 and pcJ‐3) using 68 organic molecular systems with 88
1
J
CH
couplings including different types of hybridized carbon atoms. Density functional theory assessment for the determination of
1
J
CH
coupling constants is examined, comparing the computed and experimental values. The use of shifting constants for obtaining the calculated coupling improves substantially the results, and most models become qualitatively similar. Thus, for the whole set of couplings and for all approaches excluding those using the M06 functional, the root‐mean‐square deviations lie between 4.7 and 16.4 Hz and are reduced to 4–6.5 Hz when shifting constants are considered. Alternatively, when a specific rovibrational contribution of 5 Hz is subtracted from the experimental values, good results are obtained with PBE, B3P86 and B97‐2 functionals in combination with HIII‐su3, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J and pcJ‐2 basis sets. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><doi>10.1002/mrc.4014</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0749-1581 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in chemistry, 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.775-787 |
issn | 0749-1581 1097-458X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_mrc_4014 |
source | Wiley |
title | Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A52%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20NMR%20coupling%20constants:%20Shifting%20and%20scaling%20factors%20for%20evaluating%201%20J%20CH&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20chemistry&rft.au=San%20Fabi%C3%A1n,%20J.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=775&rft.epage=787&rft.pages=775-787&rft.issn=0749-1581&rft.eissn=1097-458X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrc.4014&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_mrc_4014%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |