Loading…

Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH

Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Magnetic resonance in chemistry 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.775-787
Main Authors: San Fabián, J., García de la Vega, J.M., Suardíaz, R., Fernández‐Oliva, M., Pérez, C., Crespo‐Otero, R., Contreras, R.H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903
container_end_page 787
container_issue 12
container_start_page 775
container_title Magnetic resonance in chemistry
container_volume 51
creator San Fabián, J.
García de la Vega, J.M.
Suardíaz, R.
Fernández‐Oliva, M.
Pérez, C.
Crespo‐Otero, R.
Contreras, R.H.
description Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐pVQZ, pcJ‐2 and pcJ‐3) using 68 organic molecular systems with 88 1 J CH couplings including different types of hybridized carbon atoms. Density functional theory assessment for the determination of 1 J CH coupling constants is examined, comparing the computed and experimental values. The use of shifting constants for obtaining the calculated coupling improves substantially the results, and most models become qualitatively similar. Thus, for the whole set of couplings and for all approaches excluding those using the M06 functional, the root‐mean‐square deviations lie between 4.7 and 16.4 Hz and are reduced to 4–6.5 Hz when shifting constants are considered. Alternatively, when a specific rovibrational contribution of 5 Hz is subtracted from the experimental values, good results are obtained with PBE, B3P86 and B97‐2 functionals in combination with HIII‐su3, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J and pcJ‐2 basis sets. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/mrc.4014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_mrc_4014</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_mrc_4014</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LxDAYhIMoWFfBn5Cjl65vmqRpvUlRV1kVdA97K2_zoZW2KUlX8N-7XT3NMDPM4SHkksGSAWTXfdBLAUwckYRBqVIhi-0xSUCJMmWyYKfkLMYvAChLxROyrXw_7iacWj9gR1-e36j2u7Frh4-9GeKEwxRv6Ptn66Y5w8HQqPHQO9STD5E6H6j9xm6HhwmjT7RanZMTh120F_-6IJv7u021StevD4_V7TrVKhOpAZU1RgijC2szbkopjWsK5nIjBUoFGqzkRioJLssLRNVobsDm85qXwBfk6u9WBx9jsK4eQ9tj-KkZ1DOQeg-knoHwX3PcU-c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>San Fabián, J. ; García de la Vega, J.M. ; Suardíaz, R. ; Fernández‐Oliva, M. ; Pérez, C. ; Crespo‐Otero, R. ; Contreras, R.H.</creator><creatorcontrib>San Fabián, J. ; García de la Vega, J.M. ; Suardíaz, R. ; Fernández‐Oliva, M. ; Pérez, C. ; Crespo‐Otero, R. ; Contreras, R.H.</creatorcontrib><description>Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐pVQZ, pcJ‐2 and pcJ‐3) using 68 organic molecular systems with 88 1 J CH couplings including different types of hybridized carbon atoms. Density functional theory assessment for the determination of 1 J CH coupling constants is examined, comparing the computed and experimental values. The use of shifting constants for obtaining the calculated coupling improves substantially the results, and most models become qualitatively similar. Thus, for the whole set of couplings and for all approaches excluding those using the M06 functional, the root‐mean‐square deviations lie between 4.7 and 16.4 Hz and are reduced to 4–6.5 Hz when shifting constants are considered. Alternatively, when a specific rovibrational contribution of 5 Hz is subtracted from the experimental values, good results are obtained with PBE, B3P86 and B97‐2 functionals in combination with HIII‐su3, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J and pcJ‐2 basis sets. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-1581</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-458X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrc.4014</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in chemistry, 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.775-787</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>San Fabián, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García de la Vega, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suardíaz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Oliva, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo‐Otero, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, R.H.</creatorcontrib><title>Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH</title><title>Magnetic resonance in chemistry</title><description>Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐pVQZ, pcJ‐2 and pcJ‐3) using 68 organic molecular systems with 88 1 J CH couplings including different types of hybridized carbon atoms. Density functional theory assessment for the determination of 1 J CH coupling constants is examined, comparing the computed and experimental values. The use of shifting constants for obtaining the calculated coupling improves substantially the results, and most models become qualitatively similar. Thus, for the whole set of couplings and for all approaches excluding those using the M06 functional, the root‐mean‐square deviations lie between 4.7 and 16.4 Hz and are reduced to 4–6.5 Hz when shifting constants are considered. Alternatively, when a specific rovibrational contribution of 5 Hz is subtracted from the experimental values, good results are obtained with PBE, B3P86 and B97‐2 functionals in combination with HIII‐su3, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J and pcJ‐2 basis sets. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><issn>0749-1581</issn><issn>1097-458X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LxDAYhIMoWFfBn5Cjl65vmqRpvUlRV1kVdA97K2_zoZW2KUlX8N-7XT3NMDPM4SHkksGSAWTXfdBLAUwckYRBqVIhi-0xSUCJMmWyYKfkLMYvAChLxROyrXw_7iacWj9gR1-e36j2u7Frh4-9GeKEwxRv6Ptn66Y5w8HQqPHQO9STD5E6H6j9xm6HhwmjT7RanZMTh120F_-6IJv7u021StevD4_V7TrVKhOpAZU1RgijC2szbkopjWsK5nIjBUoFGqzkRioJLssLRNVobsDm85qXwBfk6u9WBx9jsK4eQ9tj-KkZ1DOQeg-knoHwX3PcU-c</recordid><startdate>201312</startdate><enddate>201312</enddate><creator>San Fabián, J.</creator><creator>García de la Vega, J.M.</creator><creator>Suardíaz, R.</creator><creator>Fernández‐Oliva, M.</creator><creator>Pérez, C.</creator><creator>Crespo‐Otero, R.</creator><creator>Contreras, R.H.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201312</creationdate><title>Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH</title><author>San Fabián, J. ; García de la Vega, J.M. ; Suardíaz, R. ; Fernández‐Oliva, M. ; Pérez, C. ; Crespo‐Otero, R. ; Contreras, R.H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>San Fabián, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>García de la Vega, J.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suardíaz, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández‐Oliva, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crespo‐Otero, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Contreras, R.H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>San Fabián, J.</au><au>García de la Vega, J.M.</au><au>Suardíaz, R.</au><au>Fernández‐Oliva, M.</au><au>Pérez, C.</au><au>Crespo‐Otero, R.</au><au>Contreras, R.H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in chemistry</jtitle><date>2013-12</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>775</spage><epage>787</epage><pages>775-787</pages><issn>0749-1581</issn><eissn>1097-458X</eissn><abstract>Optimized shifting and/or scaling factors for calculating one‐bond carbon–hydrogen spin–spin coupling constants have been determined for 35 combinations of representative functionals (PBE, B3LYP, B3P86, B97‐2 and M06‐L) and basis sets (TZVP, HIII‐su3, EPR‐III, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J, ccJ‐pVDZ, ccJ‐pVTZ, ccJ‐pVQZ, pcJ‐2 and pcJ‐3) using 68 organic molecular systems with 88 1 J CH couplings including different types of hybridized carbon atoms. Density functional theory assessment for the determination of 1 J CH coupling constants is examined, comparing the computed and experimental values. The use of shifting constants for obtaining the calculated coupling improves substantially the results, and most models become qualitatively similar. Thus, for the whole set of couplings and for all approaches excluding those using the M06 functional, the root‐mean‐square deviations lie between 4.7 and 16.4 Hz and are reduced to 4–6.5 Hz when shifting constants are considered. Alternatively, when a specific rovibrational contribution of 5 Hz is subtracted from the experimental values, good results are obtained with PBE, B3P86 and B97‐2 functionals in combination with HIII‐su3, aug‐cc‐pVTZ‐J and pcJ‐2 basis sets. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><doi>10.1002/mrc.4014</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-1581
ispartof Magnetic resonance in chemistry, 2013-12, Vol.51 (12), p.775-787
issn 0749-1581
1097-458X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_mrc_4014
source Wiley
title Computational NMR coupling constants: Shifting and scaling factors for evaluating 1 J CH
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A52%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Computational%20NMR%20coupling%20constants:%20Shifting%20and%20scaling%20factors%20for%20evaluating%201%20J%20CH&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20chemistry&rft.au=San%20Fabi%C3%A1n,%20J.&rft.date=2013-12&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=775&rft.epage=787&rft.pages=775-787&rft.issn=0749-1581&rft.eissn=1097-458X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrc.4014&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_mrc_4014%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c724-d072bd44dc8ee23d955dfb81f6d54a570c0e53d5750f268aa7bc3d0e6ee233903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true