Loading…
Encounter rates and catch‐and‐release mortality of steelhead in the Snake River basin
Objective The potential influence (i.e., impact rate) of catch‐and‐release fisheries on wild steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss is poorly understood and is a function of the abundance of wild fish, how many fish are encountered by anglers (i.e., encounter rate), and the mortality of fish that are caught...
Saved in:
Published in: | North American journal of fisheries management 2024-02, Vol.44 (1), p.3-20 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective
The potential influence (i.e., impact rate) of catch‐and‐release fisheries on wild steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss is poorly understood and is a function of the abundance of wild fish, how many fish are encountered by anglers (i.e., encounter rate), and the mortality of fish that are caught and released. In Idaho, estimates of wild steelhead encounter rates have been derived using the number of wild and hatchery steelhead passing Lower Granite Dam, the number of hatchery steelhead harvested, and the number of hatchery steelhead caught and released. The method includes assumptions that hatchery and wild steelhead have equal encounter rates and catch‐and‐release mortality is 5% for wild steelhead. Here, we investigated wild and hatchery steelhead encounter rates by anglers, estimated catch‐and‐release mortality, and concatenated both aspects to examine how existing recreational steelhead fisheries influence wild steelhead mortality.
Methods
We sampled, tagged, and released 1,251 spawn‐year 2020 (SY2020) and 1,956 spawn‐year 2021 (SY2021) adult steelhead at Lower Granite Dam with T‐bar anchor tags and passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags to estimate steelhead encounter rates and catch‐and‐release mortality. Differences in survival of caught steelhead and those not reported as caught were evaluated using detections at various locations (e.g., PIT arrays, weirs).
Result
Estimated encounter rates were 43.7% (95% credible interval; 28.2%, 100.0%) for wild fish and 46.7% (29.6%, 100.0%) for adipose‐clipped fish in SY2020. In SY2021, encounter rates were 47.2% (32.4%, 100.0%) for wild fish and 52.3% (37.1%, 100.0%) for adipose‐clipped fish. Based on detections of caught fish and those not reported as caught, catch‐and‐release mortality of wild steelhead was estimated to be 1.6% (0.0%, 5.2%). Wild steelhead impact rates were 0.7% (0.0%, 2.7%) in SY2020 and 0.7% (0.0%, 2.8%) in SY2021.
Conclusion
Estimated rates of impact on wild steelhead were consistent and low across years despite major differences in the structure of the fisheries. Our results suggest assuming that encounter rates are equal between hatchery and wild steelhead, and that steelhead catch‐and‐release mortality is 5%, will likely lead to a conservative estimate of the wild steelhead impact occurring from catch‐and‐release fisheries.
Impact statement
With wild steelhead numbers declining in many parts of North America, a dilemma between providing angling opportunity and wild steelhead cons |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0275-5947 1548-8675 |
DOI: | 10.1002/nafm.10965 |