Loading…

A Sampling Approach for Evaluating Particle Loss During Continuous Field Measurement of Particulate Matter

A method for evaluating sample bias in field measurements is presented. Experiments were performed in the field and laboratory to quantify the bias as a function of particle size for the scanning mobility particle sizer and the aerodynamic particle sizer. Sources of bias and sample loss considered i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Particle & particle systems characterization 2005-09, Vol.22 (2), p.99-106
Main Authors: Noble, Christopher A., Lawless, Philip A., Rodes, Charles E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A method for evaluating sample bias in field measurements is presented. Experiments were performed in the field and laboratory to quantify the bias as a function of particle size for the scanning mobility particle sizer and the aerodynamic particle sizer. Sources of bias and sample loss considered in this work were sampling line loss, instrumental differences and inlet efficiencies. Measurement of the bias and sample loss allow for correction of the data acquired in the field, so as to obtain more representative samples of atmospheric concentrations. Substantial losses of fine and ultrafine particle count were observed, with sampling line losses ranging from 10–50 %, dependent on particle size. Only minor line losses were observed for coarse particles (approximately 5 %) because the sampling line was oriented vertically. Please note: corrected DOI, in print wrong DOI (10.1002/ppsc.200400939) A method for evaluating sample bias in field measurements is presented based on experiments in the field as well as the laboratory. Sources of bias and sample loss considered in this work were sampling line loss, instrumental differences and inlet efficiencies with a strong size dependency of sample bias. Therefore, corrections allow for obtaining more representative samples of atmospheric concentrations.
ISSN:0934-0866
1521-4117
DOI:10.1002/ppsc.200490014