Loading…
Quantifying the Impact of Al Deposition Method on Underlying Al 2 O 3 /Si Interface Quality
Oxide – semiconductor interface quality has often a direct impact on the electrical properties of devices and on their performance. Traditionally, the properties are characterized through metal – oxide – semiconductor (MOS) structures by depositing a metal layer and measuring the capacitance – volta...
Saved in:
Published in: | Physica status solidi. A, Applications and materials science Applications and materials science, 2023-10, Vol.220 (20) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Oxide
–
semiconductor interface quality has often a direct impact on the electrical properties of devices and on their performance. Traditionally, the properties are characterized through metal
–
oxide
–
semiconductor (MOS) structures by depositing a metal layer and measuring the capacitance
–
voltage (
C–V
) characteristics. However, metal deposition process itself may have an impact on the oxide and the oxide
–
semiconductor interface. The impact of magnetron sputtering,
e
‐beam evaporation, and thermal evaporation on an interface is studied, where atomic layer deposited (ALD) is used, by MOS
C–V
and corona oxide characterization of semiconductors (COCOS) measurements. The latter allows characterization of the interface also in its original state before metallization. The results show that sputtering induces significant damage at the underlying interface as the measured interface defect density increases from to cm
−2
eV. Interestingly, sputtering also generates a high density of positive charges at the interface as the charge changes from to cm. Thermal evaporation is found to be a softer method, with modest impact on and . Finally, Alnealing heals the damage but has also a significant impact on the charge of the film recovering the characteristic negative charge of (∼−4 × 10
12
cm). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1862-6300 1862-6319 |
DOI: | 10.1002/pssa.202200653 |