Update on new developments in the study of human teratogens

Background and Methods The purpose of this annual article is to highlight and briefly review new and significant information on agents that may be teratogenic in pregnant women. Various sources of on‐line and printed information are given. Results The following topics have been discussed: 1) lithium...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Teratology (Philadelphia) 2002-04, Vol.65 (4), p.153-161
Main Authors: Shepard, T.H., Brent, R.L., Friedman, J.M., Jones, K.L., Miller, R.K., Moore, C.A., Polifka, J.E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Abnormalities, Drug-Induced
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Risk
Teratogens - toxicity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and Methods The purpose of this annual article is to highlight and briefly review new and significant information on agents that may be teratogenic in pregnant women. Various sources of on‐line and printed information are given. Results The following topics have been discussed: 1) lithium medication: decreased estimate of risk; 2) cigarette smoking and genotype as contributors to oral‐facial clefts and clubfoot; 3) trimethoprim; 4) methimazole syndrome?; 5) glucocorticoids and oral‐facial clefts; 6) binge drinking; 7) fetal valproate syndrome; and 8) carbamazepine. Conclusions We have highlighted several maternal exposures during pregnancy that are associated with small but increased rates of birth defects, generally only a few cases per 1,000 infants. These exposures include cigarette smoking, and treatment with lithium, trimethoprim, methimazole, or corticosteroids. This weak teratogenic effect was usually identified by the linkage of an uncommon treatment with an unusual birth defect outcome. The use of modern epidemiologic techniques, especially prospective multicenter studies that provide increased numbers, has helped to strengthen the evidence for these associations. We discuss how teratogenic risks that are small in comparison to the background risk can be presented to at‐risk women and their doctors. We have briefly listed some elements that might be used in prioritizing further studies of suspected teratogenic exposures. Various existing methods for expressing the strength of evidence for human teratogenicity are also given. Teratology 65:153–161, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:0040-3709
1096-9926
DOI:10.1002/tera.10032