Loading…
OC 10.01: Comparative study of two‐ and three‐dimensional sonohysterography versus office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of uterine cavity in the reproductive age
Saved in:
Published in: | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2013-10, Vol.42 (s1), p.19-19 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 19 |
container_issue | s1 |
container_start_page | 19 |
container_title | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Salman, M.S. Abou Salem, N. El Sherbiny, W. El‐Mazny, A. |
description | |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/uog.12632 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_12632</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1002_uog_12632</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_126323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkD1OxDAQhS0EEuGn4AbTUmQZJ4tXoY1AdDT0kZVMEqPEjvwT5I4jcAvuxUnwRnsBqtFovvfe6DF2x3HHEYuHYIYdL0RZnLGM70WV4wEfz1mGlcD8IKrikl0594GIYl-KjP281ZC0yJ-gNvMirfRqJXA-dBFMD_7T_H59g9Qd-NESpaVTM2mnjJYTOKPNGJ0nawYrlzHCStYFl6S9aglON9eaJUJvbDIhoFVOIeUYfUwICVCaoJWr8hGU3hhLizVdaLdv5EA37KKXk6Pb07xm9y_P7_Vr3iZ3Z6lvFqtmaWPDsTk20aQmmq2J8j_sH2btav4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>OC 10.01: Comparative study of two‐ and three‐dimensional sonohysterography versus office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of uterine cavity in the reproductive age</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Salman, M.S. ; Abou Salem, N. ; El Sherbiny, W. ; El‐Mazny, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Salman, M.S. ; Abou Salem, N. ; El Sherbiny, W. ; El‐Mazny, A.</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.12632</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2013-10, Vol.42 (s1), p.19-19</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salman, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou Salem, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Sherbiny, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Mazny, A.</creatorcontrib><title>OC 10.01: Comparative study of two‐ and three‐dimensional sonohysterography versus office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of uterine cavity in the reproductive age</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</title><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkD1OxDAQhS0EEuGn4AbTUmQZJ4tXoY1AdDT0kZVMEqPEjvwT5I4jcAvuxUnwRnsBqtFovvfe6DF2x3HHEYuHYIYdL0RZnLGM70WV4wEfz1mGlcD8IKrikl0594GIYl-KjP281ZC0yJ-gNvMirfRqJXA-dBFMD_7T_H59g9Qd-NESpaVTM2mnjJYTOKPNGJ0nawYrlzHCStYFl6S9aglON9eaJUJvbDIhoFVOIeUYfUwICVCaoJWr8hGU3hhLizVdaLdv5EA37KKXk6Pb07xm9y_P7_Vr3iZ3Z6lvFqtmaWPDsTk20aQmmq2J8j_sH2btav4</recordid><startdate>201310</startdate><enddate>201310</enddate><creator>Salman, M.S.</creator><creator>Abou Salem, N.</creator><creator>El Sherbiny, W.</creator><creator>El‐Mazny, A.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201310</creationdate><title>OC 10.01: Comparative study of two‐ and three‐dimensional sonohysterography versus office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of uterine cavity in the reproductive age</title><author>Salman, M.S. ; Abou Salem, N. ; El Sherbiny, W. ; El‐Mazny, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_126323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salman, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abou Salem, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Sherbiny, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El‐Mazny, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salman, M.S.</au><au>Abou Salem, N.</au><au>El Sherbiny, W.</au><au>El‐Mazny, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OC 10.01: Comparative study of two‐ and three‐dimensional sonohysterography versus office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of uterine cavity in the reproductive age</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology</jtitle><date>2013-10</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>19-19</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><doi>10.1002/uog.12632</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-7692 |
ispartof | Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2013-10, Vol.42 (s1), p.19-19 |
issn | 0960-7692 1469-0705 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_12632 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
title | OC 10.01: Comparative study of two‐ and three‐dimensional sonohysterography versus office hysteroscopy for the evaluation of uterine cavity in the reproductive age |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A50%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OC%2010.01:%20Comparative%20study%20of%20two%E2%80%90%20and%20three%E2%80%90dimensional%20sonohysterography%20versus%20office%20hysteroscopy%20for%20the%20evaluation%20of%20uterine%20cavity%20in%20the%20reproductive%20age&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Salman,%20M.S.&rft.date=2013-10&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=19-19&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.12632&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1002_uog_12632%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-crossref_primary_10_1002_uog_126323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |