Loading…
Wheat Varietal Identification by Capillary Electrophoresis: an Inter-Laboratory Comparison of Methods
Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is a rapid automated method for wheat protein analysis. It is sensitive, reproducible, and gives high resolution separation of gliadins, differentiating most genotypes. Optimal CE conditions have not yet been established, however, nor methods compared between laborator...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food science & technology 1997-01, Vol.30 (2), p.210-213 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Capillary electrophoresis (CE) is a rapid automated method for wheat protein analysis. It is sensitive, reproducible, and gives high resolution separation of gliadins, differentiating most genotypes. Optimal CE conditions have not yet been established, however, nor methods compared between laboratories. We therefore analysed gliadins from several varieties by two methods in two laboratories using comparable CE systems. A commercial 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer, pH 2.5, containing a linear hydrophilic polymer, was used with uncoated 27 cm silica capillaries (20 cm from inlet to detector) of 50 and 20 μm i.d. Separations with 50 μm capillaries were performed at 7 kV and required 30–40 min; those with 20 μm capillaries were performed at 22 kV, and separations took about 10 min. In each laboratory, both methods gave excellent separations, with comparable selectivity and resolution. For some analyses (especially those using 50 μm capillaries), however, elution times and operating currents varied with different batches of commercial buffers, giving unacceptable reproducibility. Thus, while CE is a useful alternative to slab gel electrophoresis or high performance liquid chromatography for wheat varietal identification, CE buffer compositions must be carefully controlled to ensure acceptable reproducibility. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0023-6438 1096-1127 |
DOI: | 10.1006/fstl.1996.0161 |