Loading…
Reduction of Dust Concentration and Exposure in Pig Buildings by Adding Animal Fat in Feed
Dust concentrations were reduced by 35–60% in pig buildings, while human dust exposure was lowered by 50–70% by adding 4% animal fat to the feed. However, there is still a large quantity of airborne dust in these buildings and workers should reduce their exposure risk to the high concentrations by w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of agricultural engineering research 1996-02, Vol.63 (2), p.113-120 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-52d073492f0b5216098af8932f58d1e91a2e031d464341ed85e772fd059eb3453 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 120 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 113 |
container_title | Journal of agricultural engineering research |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Takai, H. Jacobson, L.D. Pedersen, S. |
description | Dust concentrations were reduced by 35–60% in pig buildings, while human dust exposure was lowered by 50–70% by adding 4% animal fat to the feed. However, there is still a large quantity of airborne dust in these buildings and workers should reduce their exposure risk to the high concentrations by wearing a dust mask. Variations exist in dust concentrations for total dust in pig buildings. The respirable dust fraction does not appear to be location-dependent and therefore may be a better indicator for evaluating dust reduction methods. Further studies are needed to find the nature of these variations in total dust concentration, so that a representative measurement can be determined for a pig building. Total dust levels found by a personal sampler were from three to seven times larger than total dust concentrations measured by a stationary sampler. Relationships between values from personal and stationary dust samplers need to be explored for livestock environments, and improved dust measurement criteria established for evaluating dust suppression practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1006/jaer.1996.0013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1006_jaer_1996_0013</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S002186349690013X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S002186349690013X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-52d073492f0b5216098af8932f58d1e91a2e031d464341ed85e772fd059eb3453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwMntgTTh_pfZYCgWkSiAEC0vk-qNyFZzKThD970koYmO60-m9d08_hC4JlASgut5ql0qiVFUCEHaEJgSUKBTl1TGaAFBSyIrxU3SW8xYA5IyzCXp_cbY3XWgjbj2-7XOHF200LnZJ_1x1tPjua9fmPjkcIn4OG3zTh8aGuMl4vcdzO654HsOHbvBSd6Nq6Zw9RydeN9ld_M4pelvevS4eitXT_eNivioMI6IrBLUwY1xRD2tBSQVKai8Vo15IS5wimjpgxPKKM06clcLNZtRbEMqtGRdsispDrkltzsn5epeGLmlfE6hHMvVIph7J1COZwXB1MOx0NrrxSUcT8p-LAQfB5SCTB5kbyn-GISKb4AY2NiRnutq24b8P3x9kdWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reduction of Dust Concentration and Exposure in Pig Buildings by Adding Animal Fat in Feed</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Takai, H. ; Jacobson, L.D. ; Pedersen, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Takai, H. ; Jacobson, L.D. ; Pedersen, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Dust concentrations were reduced by 35–60% in pig buildings, while human dust exposure was lowered by 50–70% by adding 4% animal fat to the feed. However, there is still a large quantity of airborne dust in these buildings and workers should reduce their exposure risk to the high concentrations by wearing a dust mask. Variations exist in dust concentrations for total dust in pig buildings. The respirable dust fraction does not appear to be location-dependent and therefore may be a better indicator for evaluating dust reduction methods. Further studies are needed to find the nature of these variations in total dust concentration, so that a representative measurement can be determined for a pig building. Total dust levels found by a personal sampler were from three to seven times larger than total dust concentrations measured by a stationary sampler. Relationships between values from personal and stationary dust samplers need to be explored for livestock environments, and improved dust measurement criteria established for evaluating dust suppression practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9246</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1006/jaer.1996.0013</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAERA2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Elsevier Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Journal of agricultural engineering research, 1996-02, Vol.63 (2), p.113-120</ispartof><rights>1996</rights><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-52d073492f0b5216098af8932f58d1e91a2e031d464341ed85e772fd059eb3453</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3040548$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Takai, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, L.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Reduction of Dust Concentration and Exposure in Pig Buildings by Adding Animal Fat in Feed</title><title>Journal of agricultural engineering research</title><description>Dust concentrations were reduced by 35–60% in pig buildings, while human dust exposure was lowered by 50–70% by adding 4% animal fat to the feed. However, there is still a large quantity of airborne dust in these buildings and workers should reduce their exposure risk to the high concentrations by wearing a dust mask. Variations exist in dust concentrations for total dust in pig buildings. The respirable dust fraction does not appear to be location-dependent and therefore may be a better indicator for evaluating dust reduction methods. Further studies are needed to find the nature of these variations in total dust concentration, so that a representative measurement can be determined for a pig building. Total dust levels found by a personal sampler were from three to seven times larger than total dust concentrations measured by a stationary sampler. Relationships between values from personal and stationary dust samplers need to be explored for livestock environments, and improved dust measurement criteria established for evaluating dust suppression practices.</description><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0021-8634</issn><issn>1095-9246</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1996</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1PwzAQxS0EEqWwMntgTTh_pfZYCgWkSiAEC0vk-qNyFZzKThD970koYmO60-m9d08_hC4JlASgut5ql0qiVFUCEHaEJgSUKBTl1TGaAFBSyIrxU3SW8xYA5IyzCXp_cbY3XWgjbj2-7XOHF200LnZJ_1x1tPjua9fmPjkcIn4OG3zTh8aGuMl4vcdzO654HsOHbvBSd6Nq6Zw9RydeN9ld_M4pelvevS4eitXT_eNivioMI6IrBLUwY1xRD2tBSQVKai8Vo15IS5wimjpgxPKKM06clcLNZtRbEMqtGRdsispDrkltzsn5epeGLmlfE6hHMvVIph7J1COZwXB1MOx0NrrxSUcT8p-LAQfB5SCTB5kbyn-GISKb4AY2NiRnutq24b8P3x9kdWU</recordid><startdate>19960201</startdate><enddate>19960201</enddate><creator>Takai, H.</creator><creator>Jacobson, L.D.</creator><creator>Pedersen, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><general>Academic Press</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19960201</creationdate><title>Reduction of Dust Concentration and Exposure in Pig Buildings by Adding Animal Fat in Feed</title><author>Takai, H. ; Jacobson, L.D. ; Pedersen, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-52d073492f0b5216098af8932f58d1e91a2e031d464341ed85e772fd059eb3453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1996</creationdate><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Takai, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacobson, L.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedersen, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of agricultural engineering research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Takai, H.</au><au>Jacobson, L.D.</au><au>Pedersen, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reduction of Dust Concentration and Exposure in Pig Buildings by Adding Animal Fat in Feed</atitle><jtitle>Journal of agricultural engineering research</jtitle><date>1996-02-01</date><risdate>1996</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>113</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>113-120</pages><issn>0021-8634</issn><eissn>1095-9246</eissn><coden>JAERA2</coden><abstract>Dust concentrations were reduced by 35–60% in pig buildings, while human dust exposure was lowered by 50–70% by adding 4% animal fat to the feed. However, there is still a large quantity of airborne dust in these buildings and workers should reduce their exposure risk to the high concentrations by wearing a dust mask. Variations exist in dust concentrations for total dust in pig buildings. The respirable dust fraction does not appear to be location-dependent and therefore may be a better indicator for evaluating dust reduction methods. Further studies are needed to find the nature of these variations in total dust concentration, so that a representative measurement can be determined for a pig building. Total dust levels found by a personal sampler were from three to seven times larger than total dust concentrations measured by a stationary sampler. Relationships between values from personal and stationary dust samplers need to be explored for livestock environments, and improved dust measurement criteria established for evaluating dust suppression practices.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Elsevier Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1006/jaer.1996.0013</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8634 |
ispartof | Journal of agricultural engineering research, 1996-02, Vol.63 (2), p.113-120 |
issn | 0021-8634 1095-9246 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1006_jaer_1996_0013 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Animal productions Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Terrestrial animal productions Vertebrates |
title | Reduction of Dust Concentration and Exposure in Pig Buildings by Adding Animal Fat in Feed |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-31T23%3A57%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reduction%20of%20Dust%20Concentration%20and%20Exposure%20in%20Pig%20Buildings%20by%20Adding%20Animal%20Fat%20in%20Feed&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20agricultural%20engineering%20research&rft.au=Takai,%20H.&rft.date=1996-02-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=113&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=113-120&rft.issn=0021-8634&rft.eissn=1095-9246&rft.coden=JAERA2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1006/jaer.1996.0013&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_cross%3ES002186349690013X%3C/elsevier_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c315t-52d073492f0b5216098af8932f58d1e91a2e031d464341ed85e772fd059eb3453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |