Loading…

Implementation of a multiple biomonitoring approach to evaluate the potential for impact from an industrial discharge

Over a 2-year period, an industrial discharger implemented a program to determine if there was a potential for in-stream impact from its discharge, and, if necessary, to eliminate that potential. Six basic study designs were used. These included: (1) ambient toxicity tests using indicator organisms;...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of aquatic ecosystem health 1994-01, Vol.3 (4), p.259-271
Main Authors: Gruber, D, Frago, C, Rasnake, W J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f84e00c93592320a44195be674c9265c52d8a446b1c9a235d0255c20a736743f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f84e00c93592320a44195be674c9265c52d8a446b1c9a235d0255c20a736743f3
container_end_page 271
container_issue 4
container_start_page 259
container_title Journal of aquatic ecosystem health
container_volume 3
creator Gruber, D
Frago, C
Rasnake, W J
description Over a 2-year period, an industrial discharger implemented a program to determine if there was a potential for in-stream impact from its discharge, and, if necessary, to eliminate that potential. Six basic study designs were used. These included: (1) ambient toxicity tests using indicator organisms; (2) in-stream waste concentration (IWC) chronic testing using indicator organisms; (3) on-site flow-through toxicity testing using indicator and resident species with receiving stream water as the diluent; (4) in situ acute toxicity studies using indicator and resident species; (5) biological surveys of the receiving stream; and (6) artificial stream studies. The outcome of the studies resulted in conclusive data on which to base the design of a diffuser to dilute the effluent 1:20. This concentration was well below the lowest acute no-observed-effect concentration (10% effluent) determined using sensitive resident test species. In this manner, impact from the effluent on the James River had been reduced so that even the most sensitive resident species were protected. As a result of the study, the facility's permit was modified so that toxicity tests were made only on effluent diluted with receiving stream water to represent dilution at 1Q10 rather than 100 percent effluent. Follow-up studies have concentrated on a series of toxicity tests which were designed to identify the toxicants in the final effluent.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00115285
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00115285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29381677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f84e00c93592320a44195be674c9265c52d8a446b1c9a235d0255c20a736743f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFKxDAURYMoOI5u_IKsXAjV95KmaZY6OCoMuNF1yWTSmUjT1CQV_Hs7jOBSVw_uOxwuXEIuEW4QQN7eLwEQBavFEZmhkLwQWOIxmYFiokDA8pScpfQOAFyhnJHx2Q-d9bbPOrvQ09BSTf3YZTfFdO2CD73LIbp-S_UwxKDNjuZA7afuRp0tzTtLh5AngdMdbUOkzg_aZNrG4Knuqes3Y8px_924ZHY6bu05OWl1l-zFz52Tt-XD6-KpWL08Pi_uVoVhXOairUsLYBQXinEGuixRibWtZGkUq4QRbFNPYbVGozTjYgNMCDOBkk8Mb_mcXB28U_GP0abc-KmC7Trd2zCmhinJkdX1P0BeYyXlnyBWdVlJtjdeH0ATQ0rRts0Qndfxq0Fo9ls1v1vxb6qghsI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16846728</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementation of a multiple biomonitoring approach to evaluate the potential for impact from an industrial discharge</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gruber, D ; Frago, C ; Rasnake, W J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gruber, D ; Frago, C ; Rasnake, W J</creatorcontrib><description>Over a 2-year period, an industrial discharger implemented a program to determine if there was a potential for in-stream impact from its discharge, and, if necessary, to eliminate that potential. Six basic study designs were used. These included: (1) ambient toxicity tests using indicator organisms; (2) in-stream waste concentration (IWC) chronic testing using indicator organisms; (3) on-site flow-through toxicity testing using indicator and resident species with receiving stream water as the diluent; (4) in situ acute toxicity studies using indicator and resident species; (5) biological surveys of the receiving stream; and (6) artificial stream studies. The outcome of the studies resulted in conclusive data on which to base the design of a diffuser to dilute the effluent 1:20. This concentration was well below the lowest acute no-observed-effect concentration (10% effluent) determined using sensitive resident test species. In this manner, impact from the effluent on the James River had been reduced so that even the most sensitive resident species were protected. As a result of the study, the facility's permit was modified so that toxicity tests were made only on effluent diluted with receiving stream water to represent dilution at 1Q10 rather than 100 percent effluent. Follow-up studies have concentrated on a series of toxicity tests which were designed to identify the toxicants in the final effluent.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-1014</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00115285</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Freshwater</subject><ispartof>Journal of aquatic ecosystem health, 1994-01, Vol.3 (4), p.259-271</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f84e00c93592320a44195be674c9265c52d8a446b1c9a235d0255c20a736743f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f84e00c93592320a44195be674c9265c52d8a446b1c9a235d0255c20a736743f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gruber, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frago, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasnake, W J</creatorcontrib><title>Implementation of a multiple biomonitoring approach to evaluate the potential for impact from an industrial discharge</title><title>Journal of aquatic ecosystem health</title><description>Over a 2-year period, an industrial discharger implemented a program to determine if there was a potential for in-stream impact from its discharge, and, if necessary, to eliminate that potential. Six basic study designs were used. These included: (1) ambient toxicity tests using indicator organisms; (2) in-stream waste concentration (IWC) chronic testing using indicator organisms; (3) on-site flow-through toxicity testing using indicator and resident species with receiving stream water as the diluent; (4) in situ acute toxicity studies using indicator and resident species; (5) biological surveys of the receiving stream; and (6) artificial stream studies. The outcome of the studies resulted in conclusive data on which to base the design of a diffuser to dilute the effluent 1:20. This concentration was well below the lowest acute no-observed-effect concentration (10% effluent) determined using sensitive resident test species. In this manner, impact from the effluent on the James River had been reduced so that even the most sensitive resident species were protected. As a result of the study, the facility's permit was modified so that toxicity tests were made only on effluent diluted with receiving stream water to represent dilution at 1Q10 rather than 100 percent effluent. Follow-up studies have concentrated on a series of toxicity tests which were designed to identify the toxicants in the final effluent.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><issn>0925-1014</issn><issn>1573-5141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkcFKxDAURYMoOI5u_IKsXAjV95KmaZY6OCoMuNF1yWTSmUjT1CQV_Hs7jOBSVw_uOxwuXEIuEW4QQN7eLwEQBavFEZmhkLwQWOIxmYFiokDA8pScpfQOAFyhnJHx2Q-d9bbPOrvQ09BSTf3YZTfFdO2CD73LIbp-S_UwxKDNjuZA7afuRp0tzTtLh5AngdMdbUOkzg_aZNrG4Knuqes3Y8px_924ZHY6bu05OWl1l-zFz52Tt-XD6-KpWL08Pi_uVoVhXOairUsLYBQXinEGuixRibWtZGkUq4QRbFNPYbVGozTjYgNMCDOBkk8Mb_mcXB28U_GP0abc-KmC7Trd2zCmhinJkdX1P0BeYyXlnyBWdVlJtjdeH0ATQ0rRts0Qndfxq0Fo9ls1v1vxb6qghsI</recordid><startdate>19940101</startdate><enddate>19940101</enddate><creator>Gruber, D</creator><creator>Frago, C</creator><creator>Rasnake, W J</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940101</creationdate><title>Implementation of a multiple biomonitoring approach to evaluate the potential for impact from an industrial discharge</title><author>Gruber, D ; Frago, C ; Rasnake, W J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f84e00c93592320a44195be674c9265c52d8a446b1c9a235d0255c20a736743f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gruber, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frago, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasnake, W J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of aquatic ecosystem health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gruber, D</au><au>Frago, C</au><au>Rasnake, W J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementation of a multiple biomonitoring approach to evaluate the potential for impact from an industrial discharge</atitle><jtitle>Journal of aquatic ecosystem health</jtitle><date>1994-01-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>259</spage><epage>271</epage><pages>259-271</pages><issn>0925-1014</issn><eissn>1573-5141</eissn><abstract>Over a 2-year period, an industrial discharger implemented a program to determine if there was a potential for in-stream impact from its discharge, and, if necessary, to eliminate that potential. Six basic study designs were used. These included: (1) ambient toxicity tests using indicator organisms; (2) in-stream waste concentration (IWC) chronic testing using indicator organisms; (3) on-site flow-through toxicity testing using indicator and resident species with receiving stream water as the diluent; (4) in situ acute toxicity studies using indicator and resident species; (5) biological surveys of the receiving stream; and (6) artificial stream studies. The outcome of the studies resulted in conclusive data on which to base the design of a diffuser to dilute the effluent 1:20. This concentration was well below the lowest acute no-observed-effect concentration (10% effluent) determined using sensitive resident test species. In this manner, impact from the effluent on the James River had been reduced so that even the most sensitive resident species were protected. As a result of the study, the facility's permit was modified so that toxicity tests were made only on effluent diluted with receiving stream water to represent dilution at 1Q10 rather than 100 percent effluent. Follow-up studies have concentrated on a series of toxicity tests which were designed to identify the toxicants in the final effluent.</abstract><doi>10.1007/BF00115285</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-1014
ispartof Journal of aquatic ecosystem health, 1994-01, Vol.3 (4), p.259-271
issn 0925-1014
1573-5141
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00115285
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Freshwater
title Implementation of a multiple biomonitoring approach to evaluate the potential for impact from an industrial discharge
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A12%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementation%20of%20a%20multiple%20biomonitoring%20approach%20to%20evaluate%20the%20potential%20for%20impact%20from%20an%20industrial%20discharge&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20aquatic%20ecosystem%20health&rft.au=Gruber,%20D&rft.date=1994-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=259&rft.epage=271&rft.pages=259-271&rft.issn=0925-1014&rft.eissn=1573-5141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00115285&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29381677%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f84e00c93592320a44195be674c9265c52d8a446b1c9a235d0255c20a736743f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16846728&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true