Loading…
A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This...
Saved in:
Published in: | Instructional science 1983-04, Vol.12 (1), p.67-82 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3 |
container_end_page | 82 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 67 |
container_title | Instructional science |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH DEKEL, SHLOMIT |
description | Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This article describes one step toward that goal, i.e., the development of a curriculum for junior high school students aimed at improving thought processes, specifically, those necessary in uncertain situations (probabilistic thinking). The relevant psychological literature is summarized and the main guidelines in the curriculum development are specified: (a) encouraging students to introspect and examine their own (and others') thought processes consciously, (b) indicating the circumstances in which common modes of thinking may cause fallacies, and (c) providing better tools for coping with the problems that emerge. Two detailed examples are given. In addition, the problem of training teachers is briefly discussed and a small-scale evaluation effort is described. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00120902 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00120902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23368277</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23368277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz8FLwzAUx_EgCtbpxbvQs1B9ea9Z0mOt3RbsWimt4Km0SQMOZdLs4n9vZaKX9y4ffvBl7JrDHQeQ9w8rAI6QAJ6wgAtJEU8EnrIAACGKUcpzduH9DmYWKwgYpmHW1rXO2qLdhk0V6u1zXb3kYbPR5ZMu12FbPub1fLO8blJdNq-X7Mz17368-v0L1q7yJttERbXWWVpEBgUdImcEIkhUOPTgBkOGnBCxcCBGhUuhSIrYWQWJVQ6SGViylqQZLCU9d7Rgt8ddM-29n0bXfU5vH_301XHofmq7_9oZ3xzxzh_2059EoqWaq-kbN7FK5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer LINK Archives</source><creator>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH ; DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creator><creatorcontrib>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH ; DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creatorcontrib><description>Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This article describes one step toward that goal, i.e., the development of a curriculum for junior high school students aimed at improving thought processes, specifically, those necessary in uncertain situations (probabilistic thinking). The relevant psychological literature is summarized and the main guidelines in the curriculum development are specified: (a) encouraging students to introspect and examine their own (and others') thought processes consciously, (b) indicating the circumstances in which common modes of thinking may cause fallacies, and (c) providing better tools for coping with the problems that emerge. Two detailed examples are given. In addition, the problem of training teachers is briefly discussed and a small-scale evaluation effort is described.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00120902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Cognitive psychology ; Curricula ; Heuristics ; High school students ; Intuition ; Judgment ; Misconception ; Reasoning ; Textbooks ; Thought processes</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 1983-04, Vol.12 (1), p.67-82</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23368277$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23368277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creatorcontrib><title>A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY</title><title>Instructional science</title><description>Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This article describes one step toward that goal, i.e., the development of a curriculum for junior high school students aimed at improving thought processes, specifically, those necessary in uncertain situations (probabilistic thinking). The relevant psychological literature is summarized and the main guidelines in the curriculum development are specified: (a) encouraging students to introspect and examine their own (and others') thought processes consciously, (b) indicating the circumstances in which common modes of thinking may cause fallacies, and (c) providing better tools for coping with the problems that emerge. Two detailed examples are given. In addition, the problem of training teachers is briefly discussed and a small-scale evaluation effort is described.</description><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>Intuition</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Misconception</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>Thought processes</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz8FLwzAUx_EgCtbpxbvQs1B9ea9Z0mOt3RbsWimt4Km0SQMOZdLs4n9vZaKX9y4ffvBl7JrDHQeQ9w8rAI6QAJ6wgAtJEU8EnrIAACGKUcpzduH9DmYWKwgYpmHW1rXO2qLdhk0V6u1zXb3kYbPR5ZMu12FbPub1fLO8blJdNq-X7Mz17368-v0L1q7yJttERbXWWVpEBgUdImcEIkhUOPTgBkOGnBCxcCBGhUuhSIrYWQWJVQ6SGViylqQZLCU9d7Rgt8ddM-29n0bXfU5vH_301XHofmq7_9oZ3xzxzh_2059EoqWaq-kbN7FK5g</recordid><startdate>198304</startdate><enddate>198304</enddate><creator>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH</creator><creator>DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creator><general>Elsevier Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198304</creationdate><title>A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY</title><author>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH ; DEKEL, SHLOMIT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>Intuition</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Misconception</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>Thought processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH</au><au>DEKEL, SHLOMIT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><date>1983-04</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>67-82</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><abstract>Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This article describes one step toward that goal, i.e., the development of a curriculum for junior high school students aimed at improving thought processes, specifically, those necessary in uncertain situations (probabilistic thinking). The relevant psychological literature is summarized and the main guidelines in the curriculum development are specified: (a) encouraging students to introspect and examine their own (and others') thought processes consciously, (b) indicating the circumstances in which common modes of thinking may cause fallacies, and (c) providing better tools for coping with the problems that emerge. Two detailed examples are given. In addition, the problem of training teachers is briefly discussed and a small-scale evaluation effort is described.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00120902</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0020-4277 |
ispartof | Instructional science, 1983-04, Vol.12 (1), p.67-82 |
issn | 0020-4277 1573-1952 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00120902 |
source | JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer LINK Archives |
subjects | Cognitive psychology Curricula Heuristics High school students Intuition Judgment Misconception Reasoning Textbooks Thought processes |
title | A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A52%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20CURRICULUM%20TO%20IMPROVE%20THINKING%20UNDER%20UNCERTAINTY&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=BEYTH-MAROM,%20RUTH&rft.date=1983-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=67-82&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00120902&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E23368277%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23368277&rfr_iscdi=true |