Loading…

A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY

Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Instructional science 1983-04, Vol.12 (1), p.67-82
Main Authors: BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH, DEKEL, SHLOMIT
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 67
container_title Instructional science
container_volume 12
creator BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH
DEKEL, SHLOMIT
description Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This article describes one step toward that goal, i.e., the development of a curriculum for junior high school students aimed at improving thought processes, specifically, those necessary in uncertain situations (probabilistic thinking). The relevant psychological literature is summarized and the main guidelines in the curriculum development are specified: (a) encouraging students to introspect and examine their own (and others') thought processes consciously, (b) indicating the circumstances in which common modes of thinking may cause fallacies, and (c) providing better tools for coping with the problems that emerge. Two detailed examples are given. In addition, the problem of training teachers is briefly discussed and a small-scale evaluation effort is described.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00120902
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00120902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>23368277</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>23368277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz8FLwzAUx_EgCtbpxbvQs1B9ea9Z0mOt3RbsWimt4Km0SQMOZdLs4n9vZaKX9y4ffvBl7JrDHQeQ9w8rAI6QAJ6wgAtJEU8EnrIAACGKUcpzduH9DmYWKwgYpmHW1rXO2qLdhk0V6u1zXb3kYbPR5ZMu12FbPub1fLO8blJdNq-X7Mz17368-v0L1q7yJttERbXWWVpEBgUdImcEIkhUOPTgBkOGnBCxcCBGhUuhSIrYWQWJVQ6SGViylqQZLCU9d7Rgt8ddM-29n0bXfU5vH_301XHofmq7_9oZ3xzxzh_2059EoqWaq-kbN7FK5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Springer LINK Archives</source><creator>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH ; DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creator><creatorcontrib>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH ; DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creatorcontrib><description>Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This article describes one step toward that goal, i.e., the development of a curriculum for junior high school students aimed at improving thought processes, specifically, those necessary in uncertain situations (probabilistic thinking). The relevant psychological literature is summarized and the main guidelines in the curriculum development are specified: (a) encouraging students to introspect and examine their own (and others') thought processes consciously, (b) indicating the circumstances in which common modes of thinking may cause fallacies, and (c) providing better tools for coping with the problems that emerge. Two detailed examples are given. In addition, the problem of training teachers is briefly discussed and a small-scale evaluation effort is described.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-4277</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00120902</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Cognitive psychology ; Curricula ; Heuristics ; High school students ; Intuition ; Judgment ; Misconception ; Reasoning ; Textbooks ; Thought processes</subject><ispartof>Instructional science, 1983-04, Vol.12 (1), p.67-82</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23368277$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/23368277$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,58219,58452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creatorcontrib><title>A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY</title><title>Instructional science</title><description>Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This article describes one step toward that goal, i.e., the development of a curriculum for junior high school students aimed at improving thought processes, specifically, those necessary in uncertain situations (probabilistic thinking). The relevant psychological literature is summarized and the main guidelines in the curriculum development are specified: (a) encouraging students to introspect and examine their own (and others') thought processes consciously, (b) indicating the circumstances in which common modes of thinking may cause fallacies, and (c) providing better tools for coping with the problems that emerge. Two detailed examples are given. In addition, the problem of training teachers is briefly discussed and a small-scale evaluation effort is described.</description><subject>Cognitive psychology</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Heuristics</subject><subject>High school students</subject><subject>Intuition</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Misconception</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>Thought processes</subject><issn>0020-4277</issn><issn>1573-1952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz8FLwzAUx_EgCtbpxbvQs1B9ea9Z0mOt3RbsWimt4Km0SQMOZdLs4n9vZaKX9y4ffvBl7JrDHQeQ9w8rAI6QAJ6wgAtJEU8EnrIAACGKUcpzduH9DmYWKwgYpmHW1rXO2qLdhk0V6u1zXb3kYbPR5ZMu12FbPub1fLO8blJdNq-X7Mz17368-v0L1q7yJttERbXWWVpEBgUdImcEIkhUOPTgBkOGnBCxcCBGhUuhSIrYWQWJVQ6SGViylqQZLCU9d7Rgt8ddM-29n0bXfU5vH_301XHofmq7_9oZ3xzxzh_2059EoqWaq-kbN7FK5g</recordid><startdate>198304</startdate><enddate>198304</enddate><creator>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH</creator><creator>DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creator><general>Elsevier Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198304</creationdate><title>A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY</title><author>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH ; DEKEL, SHLOMIT</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Cognitive psychology</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Heuristics</topic><topic>High school students</topic><topic>Intuition</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Misconception</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>Thought processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DEKEL, SHLOMIT</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BEYTH-MAROM, RUTH</au><au>DEKEL, SHLOMIT</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY</atitle><jtitle>Instructional science</jtitle><date>1983-04</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>67</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>67-82</pages><issn>0020-4277</issn><eissn>1573-1952</eissn><abstract>Recent evidence indicates that people's intuitive judgments are sometimes affected by systematic biases that can lead to bad decisions. Much of the value of this research depends on its applicability, i.e., showing people when and how their judgments are wrong and how they can be improved. This article describes one step toward that goal, i.e., the development of a curriculum for junior high school students aimed at improving thought processes, specifically, those necessary in uncertain situations (probabilistic thinking). The relevant psychological literature is summarized and the main guidelines in the curriculum development are specified: (a) encouraging students to introspect and examine their own (and others') thought processes consciously, (b) indicating the circumstances in which common modes of thinking may cause fallacies, and (c) providing better tools for coping with the problems that emerge. Two detailed examples are given. In addition, the problem of training teachers is briefly discussed and a small-scale evaluation effort is described.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00120902</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-4277
ispartof Instructional science, 1983-04, Vol.12 (1), p.67-82
issn 0020-4277
1573-1952
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF00120902
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Springer LINK Archives
subjects Cognitive psychology
Curricula
Heuristics
High school students
Intuition
Judgment
Misconception
Reasoning
Textbooks
Thought processes
title A CURRICULUM TO IMPROVE THINKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A52%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20CURRICULUM%20TO%20IMPROVE%20THINKING%20UNDER%20UNCERTAINTY&rft.jtitle=Instructional%20science&rft.au=BEYTH-MAROM,%20RUTH&rft.date=1983-04&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=67&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=67-82&rft.issn=0020-4277&rft.eissn=1573-1952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00120902&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E23368277%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c253t-fc52207282ba0fbc3c3f5545f05e826583754fd809d8f09bc3d3dd37cbd39a1f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=23368277&rfr_iscdi=true