Controlled clinical trial of cadralazine as a second-step drug in the treatment of hypertension

The antihypertensive efficacy of a new long-lasting vasodilator, cadralazine, and the diuretic chlorthalidone have been compared in hypertensive patients receiving concurrent treatment with atenolol. After a 4-week run-in period with atenolol alone 100 mg/day, two groups of 10 patients whose diastol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical pharmacology 1985-01, Vol.28 (2), p.135-138
Main Authors: CATALANO, M, PARINI, J, ROMANO, M, LIBRETTI, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Antihypertensive agents
Antihypertensive Agents - therapeutic use
Atenolol - administration & dosage
Biological and medical sciences
Blood Pressure - drug effects
Cardiovascular system
Chlorthalidone - therapeutic use
Clinical Trials as Topic
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Heart Rate - drug effects
Humans
Hypertension - drug therapy
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pyridazines - adverse effects
Pyridazines - therapeutic use
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The antihypertensive efficacy of a new long-lasting vasodilator, cadralazine, and the diuretic chlorthalidone have been compared in hypertensive patients receiving concurrent treatment with atenolol. After a 4-week run-in period with atenolol alone 100 mg/day, two groups of 10 patients whose diastolic blood pressure exceeded 100 mm Hg were given for a period of 65 days either cadralazine 15 mg/day or chlorthalidone 25 mg/day, according to a randomized, double-blind, between-patients design. Compared to atenolol alone, both cadralazine and chlorthalidone induced a statistically and clinically significant decrease in blood pressure. The antihypertensive effect did not differ significantly between groups. Good compensation of the atenolol-induced decrease in heart rate was obtained with cadralazine, whereas during atenolol + chlorthalidone treatment at times the standing heart rate was significantly lower than during treatment with atenolol + cadralazine. Side-effects, many of which were already present during atenolol treatment, occurred with a similar frequency in both groups. It is concluded that atenolol + cadralazine and atenolol + chlorthalidone are equally well tolerated, acceptable and effective in the treatment of hypertension, but that further studies are warranted to explore the potential haemodynamic advantages of the cadralazine + atenolol combination.
ISSN:0031-6970
1432-1041
DOI:10.1007/BF00609680