Direct and Indirect Measures of Writing for Nonlearning Disabled and Learning Disabled College Students

Finds main effects for group but not gender. Finds that the combined use of direct and indirect measures appeared most effective in examining the complexities of writing produced by learning-disabled and nonlearning disabled college students. (RS)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Reading & writing 1992-09, Vol.4 (3), p.281-296
Main Authors: Morris-Friehe, Mary, Leuenberger, Janice
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
College Students
Comparative Analysis
Evaluation Methods
Higher Education
Sex Differences
Writing Achievement
Writing Evaluation
Writing Research
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-1016591d2f8deec764370034d907b9d946c9bf38c01bf13085c391266cd852f23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-1016591d2f8deec764370034d907b9d946c9bf38c01bf13085c391266cd852f23
container_end_page 296
container_issue 3
container_start_page 281
container_title Reading & writing
container_volume 4
creator Morris-Friehe, Mary
Leuenberger, Janice
description Finds main effects for group but not gender. Finds that the combined use of direct and indirect measures appeared most effective in examining the complexities of writing produced by learning-disabled and nonlearning disabled college students. (RS)
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF01027152
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01027152</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ484789</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ484789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-1016591d2f8deec764370034d907b9d946c9bf38c01bf13085c391266cd852f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkD1PwzAYhC0EEqGwMDN4Rgq8_ortEdIWigoMgBijxH5dBYUE2enQfw-lCAam052eu-EIOWVwwQD05fUcGHDNFN8jGVNa5GBB7ZMMLOe51FofkqOU3gCAGykyspq2Ed1I697TRe935h7rtI6Y6BDoa2zHtl_RMET6MPQd1rHf-mmb6qZD_91c_kvLoetwhfRpXHvsx3RMDkLdJTz50Ql5mc-ey9t8-XizKK-WueMKxpwBK5RlngfjEZ0upNAAQnoLurHeysLZJgjjgDWBCTDKCct4UThvFA9cTMj5btfFIaWIofqI7XsdNxWDantR9XfRF3y2gzG27hec3UkjtbHiE-mzYXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Direct and Indirect Measures of Writing for Nonlearning Disabled and Learning Disabled College Students</title><source>ERIC</source><source>Springer Online Journal Archives</source><creator>Morris-Friehe, Mary ; Leuenberger, Janice</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris-Friehe, Mary ; Leuenberger, Janice</creatorcontrib><description>Finds main effects for group but not gender. Finds that the combined use of direct and indirect measures appeared most effective in examining the complexities of writing produced by learning-disabled and nonlearning disabled college students. (RS)</description><identifier>ISSN: 0922-4777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0905</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF01027152</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>College Students ; Comparative Analysis ; Evaluation Methods ; Higher Education ; Sex Differences ; Writing Achievement ; Writing Evaluation ; Writing Research</subject><ispartof>Reading &amp; writing, 1992-09, Vol.4 (3), p.281-296</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-1016591d2f8deec764370034d907b9d946c9bf38c01bf13085c391266cd852f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-1016591d2f8deec764370034d907b9d946c9bf38c01bf13085c391266cd852f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ484789$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris-Friehe, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leuenberger, Janice</creatorcontrib><title>Direct and Indirect Measures of Writing for Nonlearning Disabled and Learning Disabled College Students</title><title>Reading &amp; writing</title><description>Finds main effects for group but not gender. Finds that the combined use of direct and indirect measures appeared most effective in examining the complexities of writing produced by learning-disabled and nonlearning disabled college students. (RS)</description><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Writing Achievement</subject><subject>Writing Evaluation</subject><subject>Writing Research</subject><issn>0922-4777</issn><issn>1573-0905</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNplkD1PwzAYhC0EEqGwMDN4Rgq8_ortEdIWigoMgBijxH5dBYUE2enQfw-lCAam052eu-EIOWVwwQD05fUcGHDNFN8jGVNa5GBB7ZMMLOe51FofkqOU3gCAGykyspq2Ed1I697TRe935h7rtI6Y6BDoa2zHtl_RMET6MPQd1rHf-mmb6qZD_91c_kvLoetwhfRpXHvsx3RMDkLdJTz50Ql5mc-ey9t8-XizKK-WueMKxpwBK5RlngfjEZ0upNAAQnoLurHeysLZJgjjgDWBCTDKCct4UThvFA9cTMj5btfFIaWIofqI7XsdNxWDantR9XfRF3y2gzG27hec3UkjtbHiE-mzYXw</recordid><startdate>19920901</startdate><enddate>19920901</enddate><creator>Morris-Friehe, Mary</creator><creator>Leuenberger, Janice</creator><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19920901</creationdate><title>Direct and Indirect Measures of Writing for Nonlearning Disabled and Learning Disabled College Students</title><author>Morris-Friehe, Mary ; Leuenberger, Janice</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-1016591d2f8deec764370034d907b9d946c9bf38c01bf13085c391266cd852f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Writing Achievement</topic><topic>Writing Evaluation</topic><topic>Writing Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris-Friehe, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leuenberger, Janice</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Reading &amp; writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris-Friehe, Mary</au><au>Leuenberger, Janice</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ484789</ericid><atitle>Direct and Indirect Measures of Writing for Nonlearning Disabled and Learning Disabled College Students</atitle><jtitle>Reading &amp; writing</jtitle><date>1992-09-01</date><risdate>1992</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>281</spage><epage>296</epage><pages>281-296</pages><issn>0922-4777</issn><eissn>1573-0905</eissn><abstract>Finds main effects for group but not gender. Finds that the combined use of direct and indirect measures appeared most effective in examining the complexities of writing produced by learning-disabled and nonlearning disabled college students. (RS)</abstract><doi>10.1007/BF01027152</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0922-4777
ispartof Reading & writing, 1992-09, Vol.4 (3), p.281-296
issn 0922-4777
1573-0905
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1007_BF01027152
source ERIC; Springer Online Journal Archives
subjects College Students
Comparative Analysis
Evaluation Methods
Higher Education
Sex Differences
Writing Achievement
Writing Evaluation
Writing Research
title Direct and Indirect Measures of Writing for Nonlearning Disabled and Learning Disabled College Students
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A30%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Direct%20and%20Indirect%20Measures%20of%20Writing%20for%20Nonlearning%20Disabled%20and%20Learning%20Disabled%20College%20Students&rft.jtitle=Reading%20&%20writing&rft.au=Morris-Friehe,%20Mary&rft.date=1992-09-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=281&rft.epage=296&rft.pages=281-296&rft.issn=0922-4777&rft.eissn=1573-0905&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF01027152&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ484789%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-1016591d2f8deec764370034d907b9d946c9bf38c01bf13085c391266cd852f23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ484789&rfr_iscdi=true